Juglone / ROS Cancer Research Results

JG, Juglone: Click to Expand ⟱
Features:
Found in roots, leaves, nut-hulls, bark and wood of walnut trees.
Juglone (5-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone)
Juglans nigra refers to the black walnut tree, which is one of the most well-known sources of juglone
-Research has focused on the hulls (the green outer covering of the walnut) because they have the highest concentrations.
-Fresh hulls can contain juglone levels in the range of approximately 1–5% of the dry weight

-Juglone can redox cycle to generate reactive oxygen species (ROS).
-Increasing Bax, decreasing Bcl‑2, caspase activation, and MMP depolarization.
-Modulation of MAPK pathways (including ERK, JNK, and p38)
-May inhibit NF‑κB signaling
-Cause DNA damage or stress that, in turn, leads to p53 pathway activation— Pin1 Inhibition
–Pin1, a peptidyl-prolyl cis/trans isomerase, is frequently overexpressed in cancer.

-ic50 maybe 5-10uM
-For matching 5uM, crude estimate is 5mg consumption of juglone required which might be 1.5 g of black walnut hull material

Juglone — Juglone (5-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone; JG) is a naturally occurring redox-active naphthoquinone found in plants of the Juglans genus, including black walnut (Juglans nigra), with particularly high concentrations reported in green walnut hulls. It is best classified as a natural small-molecule quinone and experimental anticancer agent rather than an established therapeutic drug. Its anticancer activity is strongly concentration-dependent and reflects electrophilic thiol reactivity, redox cycling, oxidative stress, mitochondrial injury, ferroptosis, apoptosis, and modulation of several oncogenic signaling pathways. Juglone is also widely used experimentally as a Pin1 inhibitor, although this designation should not imply high target selectivity because juglone can covalently modify protein sulfhydryl groups and affect transcription and other cellular proteins.

Primary mechanisms (ranked):

  1. Quinone redox cycling and electrophilic thiol reactivity causing ↑ ROS, ↓ glutathione-dependent antioxidant capacity, oxidative macromolecular injury, and oxidative-stress-driven cell death.
  2. Ferroptosis induction through lipid peroxidation and disruption of antioxidant defenses, including ↓ GPX4 and, in some cancer models, ↓ NRF2 signaling or activation of the FOSL1-HMOX1 axis.
  3. Mitochondrial apoptosis through ↓ mitochondrial membrane potential, ↑ Bax/Bcl-2 ratio, cytochrome-c release, and caspase activation.
  4. Pin1 inhibition contributing to suppression of proliferation, cancer-cell stemness, EMT, migration, angiogenesis, and oncogenic signaling; however, juglone is not a highly selective Pin1 pharmacological probe.
  5. Suppression of PI3K-AKT and related survival signaling, frequently downstream of or amplified by oxidative stress.
  6. Cell-cycle arrest through modulation of cyclins, CDKs, p21, p27, p53, and related checkpoint pathways.
  7. Stress-MAPK modulation, particularly ↑ p38 and ↑ JNK, contributing to apoptosis, ferroptosis, and autophagic responses.
  8. Suppression of EMT, invasion, stem-like phenotype, Wnt/β-catenin signaling, HIF-1α, VEGF, and angiogenic/metastatic programs in selected cancer models.
  9. Autophagy induction as a context-dependent stress response that can interact with apoptosis and oxidative injury.

Bioavailability / PK relevance: Free juglone has unfavorable drug-delivery characteristics, including hydrophobicity, high chemical reactivity, rapid disposition, and substantial renal exposure. In an animal intravenous PK study, free juglone had a plasma half-life of approximately 2 hours and showed prominent kidney localization; sterically stabilized liposomal delivery increased plasma half-life approximately 12-fold, improved tumor localization, and reduced renal toxicity. Robust human oral pharmacokinetic data are lacking. Consequently, dietary or walnut-hull intake cannot presently be converted reliably into a systemic micromolar juglone exposure.

In-vitro vs systemic exposure relevance: Most direct anticancer studies use approximately low-to-tens-of-micromolar juglone, commonly around 5–20 µM. Whether these free-drug concentrations can be maintained safely in human tumors is not established. Recent quantitative work also demonstrates limited intracellular accumulation despite extracellular juglone exposure. Thus, common in-vitro concentrations should not be assumed to be achievable through oral walnut or black-walnut-hull consumption.

Clinical evidence status: Preclinical. Juglone has substantial cell-culture evidence and multiple mouse/xenograft studies showing antitumor activity, including apoptosis, ferroptosis, anti-metastatic, and anti-angiogenic effects. There is no established anticancer dose, regulatory approval, or convincing human clinical efficacy evidence for juglone itself. Translation is limited by nonspecific electrophilic/redox chemistry, systemic toxicity risk, formulation and pharmacokinetic limitations, and the uncertain therapeutic window between cancer and normal tissues.

Juglone Mechanistic Profile

Rank Pathway / Axis Cancer Cells Normal Cells TSF Primary Effect Notes / Interpretation
1 Quinone redox cycling and thiol reactivity ↑ ROS; ↑ oxidative stress; ↓ cellular thiol buffering ↑ oxidative injury possible P/R Oxidative-stress overload Central upstream mechanism. Juglone participates in redox cycling and can react with protein and glutathione sulfhydryl groups; this contributes to efficacy but also limits selectivity.
2 Glutathione and antioxidant defense ↓ GSH; ↓ GPX4; ↓ SOD (model-dependent) ↓ antioxidant reserve possible (dose-dependent) R Loss of redox buffering Creates a permissive environment for ROS accumulation, lipid oxidation, apoptosis, and ferroptosis.
3 Ferroptosis and lipid peroxidation ↑ ferroptosis; ↑ lipid peroxidation; ↑ MDA; ↑ labile iron Potential ferroptotic toxicity at sufficient exposure R/G Iron-dependent oxidative cell death Strong recent evidence in hepatocellular carcinoma and glioblastoma; pathway execution is cancer-type dependent.
4 NRF2 GPX4 antioxidant axis ↓ NRF2; ↓ GPX4 (model-dependent) Not established R/G Ferroptosis sensitization Demonstrated particularly in glioblastoma. NRF2 modulation should not be generalized to every tumor model.
5 FOSL1 HMOX1 ferroptosis axis ↑ FOSL1; ↑ HMOX1 Not established G Ferroptosis amplification Recent HCC and pan-cancer evidence identifies this transcriptional axis as an important juglone-responsive ferroptotic mechanism.
6 Mitochondrial membrane integrity ↓ membrane potential; ↑ cytochrome-c release Mitochondrial toxicity possible R Intrinsic apoptosis initiation Observed across breast, gastric, prostate, and other cancer models.
7 BAX BCL2 caspase apoptosis ↑ BAX; ↓ BCL2; ↑ caspase-3/7; ↑ caspase-8/9 Apoptosis possible at cytotoxic exposure R/G Programmed cell death Both intrinsic and extrinsic apoptotic pathways can participate. Recent colorectal cancer data support activation of caspase-8 as well as mitochondrial caspase-9 signaling.
8 Pin1 prolyl isomerase ↓ Pin1 activity/function ↓ Pin1 and other thiol-sensitive proteins possible P/R Reduced oncogenic signaling and stemness Important experimental target associated with ↓ proliferation, ↓ EMT, ↓ stemness, and ↓ angiogenesis. Juglone is not Pin1-selective and can directly modify sulfhydryl-containing proteins.
9 PI3K AKT survival signaling ↓ PI3K; ↓ AKT; ↓ p-AKT Context-dependent R/G Survival pathway suppression ROS scavenging can partially reverse this effect in NSCLC, indicating substantial coupling between oxidative stress and PI3K-AKT inhibition.
10 p38 JNK stress signaling ↑ p38; ↑ JNK Context-dependent R Stress-mediated apoptosis and ferroptosis Activation is frequently associated with ROS production and can contribute to NRF2-GPX4 suppression and programmed cell death.
11 Cell cycle checkpoints ↑ arrest; ↓ CDK2; ↓ CDK4; ↓ cyclins; ↑ p21; ↑ p27 Growth inhibition possible G Proliferation blockade Cell-cycle phase varies by model. Recent colorectal cancer data support G0/G1 arrest with suppression of CCND1, CCNB1, CDK2, and CDK4.
12 p53 DNA damage response ↑ DNA damage; ↑ γH2AX; ↑ p53 (model-dependent) Genotoxicity possible R/G Checkpoint activation and apoptosis May arise partly from quinone-driven ROS and electrophilic stress rather than a specific DNA-targeting interaction.
13 Intracellular calcium and mitochondrial stress ↑ Ca²⁺ (model-dependent) Not established P/R Apoptotic signaling Increased intracellular Ca²⁺ has been demonstrated in MCF-7 cells together with ROS elevation and mitochondrial depolarization.
14 EMT migration and invasion ↓ EMT; ↑ E-cadherin; ↓ N-cadherin; ↓ Snail; ↓ migration; ↓ invasion Not established G Reduced metastatic phenotype Pin1, AKT-GSK3β-Snail, TGF-β-related, and other signaling systems have been implicated depending on tumor model.
15 Cancer stemness ↓ sphere formation; ↓ tumor-initiating phenotype Not established G Reduced self-renewal and metastatic potential Pin1 inhibition appears to contribute. Effects have been demonstrated in colorectal and other tumor-initiating cell models.
16 Wnt beta-catenin signaling ↓ Wnt/β-catenin (model-dependent) Not established G Reduced invasion and angiogenesis Most clearly demonstrated in pancreatic cancer models; not necessarily a universal primary mechanism.
17 HIF-1α VEGF angiogenic signaling ↓ HIF-1α; ↓ VEGF; ↓ angiogenesis Potential vascular effects not well characterized G Reduced tumor vascular support Secondary/contextual anticancer mechanism reported in pancreatic cancer and Pin1-related models.
18 Autophagy stress response ↑ LC3-II; ↑ Beclin-1; ↓ p62 (model-dependent) Context-dependent G Autophagic stress and death crosstalk Autophagy can accompany ROS/MAPK signaling but its contribution to net cytotoxicity varies by cell type and experimental conditions.
19 Chemosensitization ↑ drug cytotoxicity in selected combinations Potential ↑ combination toxicity G Combination-treatment sensitization Juglone can enhance etoposide cytotoxicity through Pin1-related mechanisms, but sequence of administration can substantially alter the interaction.
20 Clinical Translation Constraint Effective concentrations commonly ~5–20 µM in vitro Systemic electrophilic and oxidative toxicity limits selectivity G Uncertain therapeutic window Human bioavailability and therapeutic exposure are not established. Free juglone has short animal plasma persistence, renal accumulation, and nephrotoxicity; formulations such as liposomes materially alter PK and distribution.

P: 0–30 min     R: 30 min–3 hr     G: >3 hr

>

ROS, Reactive Oxygen Species: Click to Expand ⟱
Source: HalifaxProj (inhibit)
Type:
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are highly reactive molecules that contain oxygen and can lead to oxidative stress in cells. They play a dual role in cancer biology, acting as both promoters and suppressors of cancer.
ROS can cause oxidative damage to DNA, leading to mutations that may contribute to cancer initiation and progression. So normally you want to inhibit ROS to prevent cell mutations.
However excessive ROS can induce apoptosis (programmed cell death) in cancer cells, potentially limiting tumor growth. Chemotherapy typically raises ROS.
-mitochondria is the main source of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (and the ETC is heavily related)
ROS Homeostasis in Cancer Cells and Its Potential as a Therapeutic Target

"Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are two electron reduction products of oxygen, including superoxide anion, hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl radical, lipid peroxides, protein peroxides and peroxides formed in nucleic acids 1. They are maintained in a dynamic balance by a series of reduction-oxidation (redox) reactions in biological systems and act as signaling molecules to drive cellular regulatory pathways."
"During different stages of cancer formation, abnormal ROS levels play paradoxical roles in cell growth and death 8. A physiological concentration of ROS that maintained in equilibrium is necessary for normal cell survival. Ectopic ROS accumulation promotes cell proliferation and consequently induces malignant transformation of normal cells by initiating pathological conversion of physiological signaling networks. Excessive ROS levels lead to cell death by damaging cellular components, including proteins, lipid bilayers, and chromosomes. Therefore, both scavenging abnormally elevated ROS to prevent early neoplasia and facilitating ROS production to specifically kill cancer cells are promising anticancer therapeutic strategies, in spite of their contradictoriness and complexity."
"ROS are the collection of derivatives of molecular oxygen that occur in biology, which can be categorized into two types, free radicals and non-radical species. The non-radical species are hydrogen peroxide (H 2O 2 ), organic hydroperoxides (ROOH), singlet molecular oxygen ( 1 O 2 ), electronically excited carbonyl, ozone (O3 ), hypochlorous acid (HOCl, and hypobromous acid HOBr). Free radical species are super-oxide anion radical (O 2•−), hydroxyl radical (•OH), peroxyl radical (ROO•) and alkoxyl radical (RO•) [130]. Any imbalance of ROS can lead to adverse effects. H2 O 2 and O 2 •− are the main redox signalling agents. The cellular concentration of H2 O 2 is about 10−8 M, which is almost a thousand times more than that of O2 •−".
"Radicals are molecules with an odd number of electrons in the outer shell [393,394]. A pair of radicals can be formed by breaking a chemical bond or electron transfer between two molecules."

Recent investigations have documented that polyphenols with good antioxidant activity may exhibit pro-oxidant activity in the presence of copper ions, which can induce apoptosis in various cancer cell lines but not in normal cells. "We have shown that such cell growth inhibition by polyphenols in cancer cells is reversed by copper-specific sequestering agent neocuproine to a significant extent whereas iron and zinc chelators are relatively ineffective, thus confirming the role of endogenous copper in the cytotoxic action of polyphenols against cancer cells. Therefore, this mechanism of mobilization of endogenous copper." > Ions could be one of the important mechanisms for the cytotoxic action of plant polyphenols against cancer cells and is possibly a common mechanism for all plant polyphenols. In fact, similar results obtained with four different polyphenolic compounds in this study, namely apigenin, luteolin, EGCG, and resveratrol, strengthen this idea.
Interestingly, the normal breast epithelial MCF10A cells have earlier been shown to possess no detectable copper as opposed to breast cancer cells [24], which may explain their resistance to polyphenols apigenin- and luteolin-induced growth inhibition as observed here (Fig. 1). We have earlier proposed [25] that this preferential cytotoxicity of plant polyphenols toward cancer cells is explained by the observation made several years earlier, which showed that copper levels in cancer cells are significantly elevated in various malignancies. Thus, because of higher intracellular copper levels in cancer cells, it may be predicted that the cytotoxic concentrations of polyphenols required would be lower in these cells as compared to normal cells."

Majority of ROS are produced as a by-product of oxidative phosphorylation, high levels of ROS are detected in almost all cancers.
-It is well established that during ER stress, cytosolic calcium released from the ER is taken up by the mitochondrion to stimulate ROS overgeneration and the release of cytochrome c, both of which lead to apoptosis.

Note: Products that may raise ROS can be found using this database, by:
Filtering on the target of ROS, and selecting the Effect Direction of ↑

Targets to raise ROS (to kill cancer cells):
• NADPH oxidases (NOX): NOX enzymes are involved in the production of ROS.
    -Targeting NOX enzymes can increase ROS levels and induce cancer cell death.
    -eNOX2 inhibition leads to a high NADH/NAD⁺ ratio which can lead to increased ROS
• Mitochondrial complex I: Inhibiting can increase ROS production
• P53: Activating p53 can increase ROS levels(by inducing the expression of pro-oxidant genes)
• Nrf2 inhibition: regulates the expression of antioxidant genes. Inhibiting Nrf2 can increase ROS levels
• Glutathione (GSH): an antioxidant. Depleting GSH can increase ROS levels
• Catalase: Catalase converts H2O2 into H2O+O. Inhibiting catalase can increase ROS levels
• SOD1: converts superoxide into hydrogen peroxide. Inhibiting SOD1 can increase ROS levels
• PI3K/AKT pathway: regulates cell survival and metabolism. Inhibiting can increase ROS levels
• HIF-1α inhibition: regulates genes involved in metabolism and angiogenesis. Inhibiting HIF-1α can increase ROS
• Glycolysis: Inhibiting glycolysis can increase ROS levels • Fatty acid oxidation: Cancer cells often rely on fatty acid oxidation for energy production.
-Inhibiting fatty acid oxidation can increase ROS levels
• ER stress: Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress can increase ROS levels
• Autophagy: process by which cells recycle damaged organelles and proteins.
-Inhibiting autophagy can increase ROS levels and induce cancer cell death.
• KEAP1/Nrf2 pathway: regulates the expression of antioxidant genes.
    -Inhibiting KEAP1 or activating Nrf2 can increase ROS levels and induce cancer cell death.
• DJ-1: regulates the expression of antioxidant genes. Inhibiting DJ-1 can increase ROS levels
• PARK2: regulates the expression of antioxidant genes. Inhibiting PARK2 can increase ROS levels
• SIRT1 inhibition:regulates the expression of antioxidant genes. Inhibiting SIRT1 can increase ROS levels
• AMPK activation: regulates energy metabolism and can increase ROS levels when activated.
• mTOR inhibition: regulates cell growth and metabolism. Inhibiting mTOR can increase ROS levels
• HSP90 inhibition: regulates protein folding and can increase ROS levels when inhibited.
• Proteasome: degrades damaged proteins. Inhibiting the proteasome can increase ROS levels
• Lipid peroxidation: a process by which lipids are oxidized, leading to the production of ROS.
    -Increasing lipid peroxidation can increase ROS levels
• Ferroptosis: form of cell death that is regulated by iron and lipid peroxidation.
    -Increasing ferroptosis can increase ROS levels
• Mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP): regulates mitochondrial permeability.
    -Opening the mPTP can increase ROS levels
• BCL-2 family proteins: regulate apoptosis and can increase ROS levels when inhibited.
• Caspase-independent cell death: a form of cell death that is regulated by ROS.
    -Increasing caspase-independent cell death can increase ROS levels
• DNA damage response: regulates the repair of DNA damage. Increasing DNA damage can increase ROS
• Epigenetic regulation: process by which gene expression is regulated.
    -Increasing epigenetic regulation can increase ROS levels

-PKM2, but not PKM1, can be inhibited by direct oxidation of cysteine 358 as an adaptive response to increased intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS)

ProOxidant Strategy:(inhibit the Mevalonate Pathway (likely will also inhibit GPx)
-HydroxyCitrate (HCA) found as supplement online and typically used in a dose of about 1.5g/day or more
-Atorvastatin typically 40-80mg/day, -Dipyridamole typically 200mg 2x/day Combined effect research
-Lycopene typically 100mg/day range (note debatable as it mainly lowers NRF2)

Dual Role of Reactive Oxygen Species and their Application in Cancer Therapy 
ROS-Inducing Interventions in Cancer — Canonical + Mechanistic Reference
-generated from AI and Cancer database
ROS rating:  +++ strong | ++ moderate | + weak | ± mixed | 0 none
NRF2:        ↓ suppressed | ↑ activated | ± mixed | 0 none
Conditions:  [D] dose  [Fe] metal  [M] metabolic  [O₂] oxygen
             [L] light [F] formulation [T] tumor-type [C] combination




Item ROS↑ NRF2 Condition Mechanism Class Remarks 



ROS">Piperlongumine
+++ ↓ [D][T] ROS-dominant






ROS">Shikonin
+++↓/±[D][T]ROS-dominant






ROS">Vitamin K3 (menadione)
+++↓[D]ROS-dominant






ROS">Copper (ionic / nano)
+++↓[Fe][F]ROS-dominant






ROS">Sodium Selenite
+++↓[D]ROS-dominant






ROS">Juglone
+++↓[D]ROS-dominant






ROS">Auranofin
+++↓[D]ROS-dominant






ROS">Photodynamic Therapy (PDT)
+++0[L][O₂]ROS-dominant






ROS">Radiotherapy / Radiation
+++0[O₂]ROS-dominant






ROS">Doxorubicin
+++↓[D]ROS-dominant






ROS">Cisplatin
++↓[D][T]ROS-dominant






ROS">Salinomycin
++↓[D][T]ROS-dominant






ROS">Artemisinin / DHA
++↓[Fe][T]ROS-dominant






ROS">Sulfasalazine
++↓[C][T]ROS-dominant






ROS">FMD / fasting
++↓[M][C][O₂]ROS-dominant






ROS">Vitamin C (pharmacologic)
++↓[Fe][D]ROS-dominant






ROS">Silver nanoparticles
++±[F][D]ROS-dominant






ROS">Gambogic acid
++↓[D][T]ROS-dominant






ROS">Parthenolide
++↓[D][T]ROS-dominant






ROS">Plumbagin
++↓[D]ROS-dominant






ROS">Allicin
++↓[D]ROS-dominant






ROS">Ashwagandha (Withaferin A)
++↓[D][T]ROS-dominant






ROS">Berberine
++↓[D][M]ROS-dominant






ROS">PEITC
++↓[D][C]ROS-dominant






ROS">Methionine restriction
+↓[M][C][T]ROS-secondary






ROS">DCA
+±[M][T]ROS-secondary






ROS">Capsaicin
+±[D][T]ROS-secondary






ROS">Galloflavin
+0[D]ROS-secondary






ROS">Piperine
+±[D][F]ROS-secondary






ROS">Propyl gallate
+↓[D]ROS-secondary






ROS">Scoulerine
+?[D][T]ROS-secondary






ROS">Thymoquinone
±±[D][T]Dual redox






ROS">Emodin
±±[D][T]Dual redox






ROS">Alpha-lipoic acid (ALA)
±↑[D][M]NRF2-dominant






ROS">Curcumin
±↑/↓[D][F]NRF2-dominant






ROS">EGCG
±↑/↓[D][O₂]NRF2-dominant






ROS">Quercetin
±↑/↓[D][Fe]NRF2-dominant






ROS">Resveratrol
±↑[D][M]NRF2-dominant






ROS">Sulforaphane
±↑↑[D]NRF2-dominant






ROS">Lycopene
0↑—Antioxidant






ROS">Rosmarinic acid
0↑—Antioxidant






ROS">Citrate
00—Neutral


Scientific Papers found: Click to Expand⟱
5119- JG,    Juglone Suppresses Inflammation and Oxidative Stress in Colitis Mice
- in-vivo, Nor, NA
*antiOx↑, *OS↑, *IL6↓, *IL12↓, *IL23↓, *TNF-α↓, *Inflam↓, *NF-kB↓, *NFE2L2↓, *ROS↓,
5113- JG,    Juglone in Oxidative Stress and Cell Signaling
- Review, Var, NA - Review, AD, NA
ROS↑, Pin1↓, antiOx⇅, *ROS↓, SMAD2↓, GSH↓, lipid-P↑, TumCCA↓, BAX↑, Bcl-2↓, Casp3↑, Casp9↑, Ca+2↑, Cyt‑c↑, AntiFungal↑, Bacteria↓, Akt↓,

Showing Research Papers: 1 to 2 of 2

* indicates research on normal cells as opposed to diseased cells
Total Research Paper Matches: 2

Pathway results for Effect on Cancer / Diseased Cells:


Redox & Oxidative Stress(tgid=1) ⓘ

antiOx⇅, 1,   GSH↓, 1,   lipid-P↑, 1,   ROS↑, 1,  

Cell Death(tgid=5) ⓘ

Akt↓, 1,   BAX↑, 1,   Bcl-2↓, 1,   Casp3↑, 1,   Casp9↑, 1,   Cyt‑c↑, 1,  

Cell Cycle & Senescence(tgid=11) ⓘ

TumCCA↓, 1,  

Migration(tgid=13) ⓘ

Ca+2↑, 1,   SMAD2↓, 1,  

Functional Outcomes(tgid=23) ⓘ

Pin1↓, 1,  

Infection & Microbiome(tgid=24) ⓘ

AntiFungal↑, 1,   Bacteria↓, 1,  
Total Targets: 16

Pathway results for Effect on Normal Cells:


Redox & Oxidative Stress(tgid=1) ⓘ

antiOx↑, 1,   NFE2L2↓, 1,   ROS↓, 2,  

Immune & Inflammatory Signaling(tgid=16) ⓘ

IL12↓, 1,   IL23↓, 1,   IL6↓, 1,   Inflam↓, 1,   NF-kB↓, 1,   TNF-α↓, 1,  

Clinical Biomarkers(tgid=22) ⓘ

IL6↓, 1,  

Functional Outcomes(tgid=23) ⓘ

OS↑, 1,  
Total Targets: 11

Scientific Paper Hit Count for: ROS, Reactive Oxygen Species
Query results interpretion may depend on "conditions" listed in the research papers.
Such Conditions may include : 
  -low or high Dose
  -format for product, such as nano of lipid formations
  -different cell line effects
  -synergies with other products 
  -if effect was for normal or cancerous cells

Filter Conditions: Pro/AntiFlg:%  IllCat:%  CanType:%  Cells:%  prod#:105  Target#:275  State#:%  Dir#:1
  wNotes=0  sortOrder:rid,rpid

 

Home Page