Magnetic Fields / NF-kB Cancer Research Results

MF, Magnetic Fields: Click to Expand ⟱
Features: Therapy
Magnetic Fields can be Static, or pulsed. The most common therapy is a pulsed magnetic field in the uT or mT range.
The main pathways affected are:
Calcium Signaling: -influence the activity of voltage-gated calcium channels.
Oxidative Stress and Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) Pathways
Heat Shock Proteins (HSPs) and Cellular Stress Responses
Cell Proliferation and Growth Signaling: MAPK/ERK pathway.
Gene Expression and Epigenetic Modifications: NF-κB
Angiogenesis Pathways: VEGF (improving VEGF for normal cells)
PEMF was found to have a 2-fold increase in drug uptake compared to traditional electrochemotherapy in rat melanoma models

Pathways:
- most reports have ROS production increasing in cancer cells , while decreasing in normal cells.
- ROS↑ related: MMP↓(ΔΨm), ER Stress↑, UPR↑, GRP78↑, Ca+2↑, Cyt‑c↑, Caspases↑, DNA damage↑, cl-PARP↑, HSP↓, Prx,
- Raises AntiOxidant defense in Normal Cells: ROS↓, NRF2↑, SOD↑, GSH↑, Catalase↑,
- lowers Inflammation : NF-kB↓">NF-kB↓, COX2↓, Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines : NLRP3↓, IL-1β↓, TNF-α↓, IL-6↓, IL-8↓
- inhibit Growth/Metastases : TumMeta↓, TumCG↓, VEGF↓(mostly regulated up in normal cells),
- cause Cell cycle arrest : TumCCA↑,
- inhibits Migration/Invasion : TumCMig↓, TumCI↓, TNF-α↓,
- inhibits glycolysis /Warburg Effect and ATP depletion : HIF-1α↓, PKM2↓, GLUT1↓, LDH↓, HK2↓, PFKs↓, PDKs↓, ECAR↓, OXPHOS↓, GRP78↑, Glucose↓, GlucoseCon↓
- inhibits angiogenesis↓ : VEGF↓, HIF-1α↓, Notch↓, FGF↓, PDGF↓, EGFR↓, Integrins↓,
- Others: PI3K↓, AKT↓, STAT↓, Wnt↓, β-catenin↓, ERK↓, JNK, - SREBP (related to cholesterol).
- Synergies: chemo-sensitization, chemoProtective, cytoProtective, RadioSensitizer, RadioProtective, Others(review target notes), Neuroprotective, Hepatoprotective, CardioProtective,

- Selectivity: Cancer Cells vs Normal Cells

Non-Static Magnetic Fields (AC / Pulsed / Oscillating MF)
Rank Pathway / Axis Cancer Cells Normal Cells TSF Primary Effect Notes / Interpretation
1 Reactive oxygen species (ROS) ↑ ROS (P→R); often sustained (G) ↑ ROS (P); ↔/↓ net ROS (R→G) P, R, G Upstream redox perturbation MF perturbs electron/radical dynamics: normal cells often adapt (ROS setpoint ↓), cancer cells less so
2 NRF2 antioxidant response ↔ / insufficient NRF2 induction (R→G) ↑ NRF2 activation (R→G) R, G Adaptive redox defense Explains mixed ROS direction in normal cells (initial ↑ then adaptive ↓)
3 Glutathione (GSH) homeostasis ↓ GSH (R→G) ↔ or transient ↓ (R) with recovery (G) R, G Redox buffering capacity GSH depletion reflects sustained oxidative load; recovery indicates successful adaptation
4 Superoxide dismutase (SOD) / antioxidant enzymes ↔ or inadequate enzyme upshift (G) ↑ SOD/GPx/CAT capacity (G) G Longer-term antioxidant remodeling Often the “endpoint” readout that correlates with ROS-normalization in normal tissue
5 Mitochondrial ETC / respiration ↓ ETC efficiency; ↑ electron leak (P→R) ↔ mild, reversible ETC perturbation (P→R) P, R Bioenergetic destabilization ETC perturbation is a mechanistic bridge between MF exposure and ROS/ΔΨm changes
6 Mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm / MMP) ↓ ΔΨm (R); may progress (G) ↔ preserved or reversible dip (R) R, G Mitochondrial dysfunction thresholding ΔΨm loss typically follows ROS/ETC disruption rather than preceding it
7 Ca²⁺ signaling (VGCC / ER–mitochondria Ca²⁺ flux) ↑ dysregulated Ca²⁺ influx/transfer (P→R); overload may persist (G) ↑ transient Ca²⁺ signaling (P); homeostasis restored (R→G) P, R, G Stress signal amplification Ca²⁺ dysregulation links ROS/ETC perturbation to ER stress and mitochondrial dysfunction (amplifies ΔΨm loss and UPR commitment)
8 Mitochondrial permeability transition pore (MPTP) ↑ MPTP opening propensity (R); sustained opening possible (G) ↔ transient or closed (R→G) P, R, G Commitment point for mitochondrial failure MPTP opening integrates ROS, Ca²⁺ overload, and ΔΨm loss; acts as a threshold event converting reversible stress into irreversible mitochondrial dysfunction
9 ER stress / UPR ↑ ER stress (R); CHOP-commitment possible (G) ↑ adaptive UPR (R); resolves (G) R, G Proteostasis stress Often downstream of ROS + Ca²⁺ handling perturbations
10 DNA damage (oxidative) ↑ damage markers (R→G) ↔ or repaired (G) R, G Checkpoint pressure Generally secondary to ROS; interpret as stress consequence not “direct genotoxicity”
11 LDH / glycolytic flux ↓ glycolytic performance (R→G) ↔ flexible substrate switching (R→G) R, G Metabolic vulnerability Redox imbalance can destabilize high-rate glycolysis in cancer-biased contexts
12 Thioredoxin system (Trx / TrxR) ↓ functional reserve / overload (R→G) ↔ preserved capacity (G) R, G Parallel antioxidant system stress Useful when GSH-only does not explain redox phenotype 
Time-Scale Flag: TSF = P / R / G
  P: 0–30 min (physical / electron / radical effects)
  R: 30 min–3 hr (redox signaling & stress response)
  G: >3 hr (gene-regulatory adaptation)
MPTP: opening represents a mitochondrial commitment event integrating ROS and Ca²⁺ stress; sustained opening indicates irreversible bioenergetic failure.
NF-kB, Nuclear factor kappa B: Click to Expand ⟱
Source: HalifaxProj(inhibit)
Type:
NF-kB signaling
Nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) is a transcription factor that plays a crucial role in regulating immune response, inflammation, cell proliferation, and survival.
NF-κB is often found to be constitutively active in many types of cancer cells. This persistent activation can promote tumorigenesis by enhancing cell survival, proliferation, and metastasis.
Scientific Papers found: Click to Expand⟱
400- AgNPs,  MF,    Polyvinyl Alcohol Capped Silver Nanostructures for Fortified Apoptotic Potential Against Human Laryngeal Carcinoma Cells Hep-2 Using Extremely-Low Frequency Electromagnetic Field
- in-vitro, Laryn, HEp2
TumCP↓, Casp3↑, P53↑, Beclin-1↑, TumAuto↑, GSR↑, ROS↑, MDA↑, ROS↑, SIRT1↑, Ca+2↑, Endon↑, DNAdam↑, Apoptosis↑, NF-kB↓,
2237- MF,    The Effect of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Stimulation of Live Cells on Intracellular Ca2+ Dynamics Changes Notably Involving Ion Channels
- in-vitro, AML, KG-1 - in-vitro, Nor, HUVECs
Ca+2↑, selectivity↑, *Inflam↓, *TNF-α↓, *NF-kB↓, *Ca+2↓,
2253- MF,    Low-frequency pulsed electromagnetic field promotes functional recovery, reduces inflammation and oxidative stress, and enhances HSP70 expression following spinal cord injury
- in-vivo, Nor, NA
*Inflam↓, *TNF-α↓, *IL1β↓, *NF-kB↓, *iNOS↓, *ROS↓, Catalase↑, *SOD↑, *HSP70/HSPA5↑, *neuroP↑, *motorD↑, *antiOx↑,
4105- MF,    Extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields stimulation modulates autoimmunity and immune responses: a possible immuno-modulatory therapeutic effect in neurodegenerative diseases
- Review, AD, NA
*Inflam↓, *neuroP↑, *NO↑, *ROS↓, *NO↓, *MCP1↑, *HSP70/HSPA5↑, *antiOx↑, *NRF2↑, *NF-kB↓,
3536- MF,    Targeting Mesenchymal Stromal Cells/Pericytes (MSCs) With Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) Has the Potential to Treat Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Review, Arthritis, NA - Review, Stroke, NA
*Inflam↓, *Diff↑, *toxicity∅, *other↑, *SOX9↑, *COL2A1↑, *NO↓, *PGE2↓, *NF-kB↓, *TNF-α↓, *IL1β↓, *IL6↓, *IL10↑, *angioG↑, *MSCs↑, *VEGF↑, *TGF-β↑, *angioG↝, *VEGF↓, Ca+2↝,
3741- MF,    Promising application of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields (PEMFs) in musculoskeletal disorders
- Review, NA, NA
*eff↑, *BMD↑, *Inflam↓, *PGE2↓, *IL6↓, *IL8↓, *NF-kB↓, *mTOR↝,
204- MFrot,  MF,    Rotating magnetic field improved cognitive and memory impairments in a sporadic ad model of mice by regulating microglial polarization
- in-vivo, AD, NA
*NF-kB↓, *MAPK↓, *TLR4↓, *memory↑, *cognitive↑, *TGF-β1↑, *ARG↑, *IL4↑, *IL10↑, *IL6↓, *IL1↓, *TNF-α↓, *iNOS↓, *ROS↓, *NO↓, *MyD88↓, *p‑IKKα↓, *p‑IκB↓, *p‑p65↓, *p‑JNK↓, *p‑p38↓, *ERK↓, *neuroP↑, *Aβ↓,

Showing Research Papers: 1 to 7 of 7

* indicates research on normal cells as opposed to diseased cells
Total Research Paper Matches: 7

Pathway results for Effect on Cancer / Diseased Cells:


Redox & Oxidative Stress ⓘ

Catalase↑, 1,   GSR↑, 1,   MDA↑, 1,   ROS↑, 2,  

Core Metabolism/Glycolysis ⓘ

SIRT1↑, 1,  

Cell Death ⓘ

Apoptosis↑, 1,   Casp3↑, 1,   Endon↑, 1,  

Autophagy & Lysosomes ⓘ

Beclin-1↑, 1,   TumAuto↑, 1,  

DNA Damage & Repair ⓘ

DNAdam↑, 1,   P53↑, 1,  

Migration ⓘ

Ca+2↑, 2,   Ca+2↝, 1,   TumCP↓, 1,  

Immune & Inflammatory Signaling ⓘ

NF-kB↓, 1,  

Drug Metabolism & Resistance ⓘ

selectivity↑, 1,  
Total Targets: 17

Pathway results for Effect on Normal Cells:


Redox & Oxidative Stress ⓘ

antiOx↑, 2,   NRF2↑, 1,   ROS↓, 3,   SOD↑, 1,  

Cell Death ⓘ

iNOS↓, 2,   p‑JNK↓, 1,   MAPK↓, 1,   p‑p38↓, 1,  

Kinase & Signal Transduction ⓘ

SOX9↑, 1,  

Transcription & Epigenetics ⓘ

other↑, 1,  

Protein Folding & ER Stress ⓘ

HSP70/HSPA5↑, 2,  

Proliferation, Differentiation & Cell State ⓘ

Diff↑, 1,   ERK↓, 1,   MSCs↑, 1,   mTOR↝, 1,  

Migration ⓘ

ARG↑, 1,   Ca+2↓, 1,   COL2A1↑, 1,   TGF-β↑, 1,   TGF-β1↑, 1,  

Angiogenesis & Vasculature ⓘ

angioG↑, 1,   angioG↝, 1,   NO↓, 3,   NO↑, 1,   VEGF↓, 1,   VEGF↑, 1,  

Immune & Inflammatory Signaling ⓘ

p‑IKKα↓, 1,   IL1↓, 1,   IL10↑, 2,   IL1β↓, 2,   IL4↑, 1,   IL6↓, 3,   IL8↓, 1,   Inflam↓, 5,   p‑IκB↓, 1,   MCP1↑, 1,   MyD88↓, 1,   NF-kB↓, 6,   p‑p65↓, 1,   PGE2↓, 2,   TLR4↓, 1,   TNF-α↓, 4,  

Protein Aggregation ⓘ

Aβ↓, 1,  

Drug Metabolism & Resistance ⓘ

eff↑, 1,  

Clinical Biomarkers ⓘ

BMD↑, 1,   IL6↓, 3,  

Functional Outcomes ⓘ

cognitive↑, 1,   memory↑, 1,   motorD↑, 1,   neuroP↑, 3,   toxicity∅, 1,  
Total Targets: 51

Scientific Paper Hit Count for: NF-kB, Nuclear factor kappa B
7 Magnetic Fields
1 Silver-NanoParticles
1 Magnetic Field Rotating
Query results interpretion may depend on "conditions" listed in the research papers.
Such Conditions may include : 
  -low or high Dose
  -format for product, such as nano of lipid formations
  -different cell line effects
  -synergies with other products 
  -if effect was for normal or cancerous cells

Filter Conditions: Pro/AntiFlg:%  IllCat:%  CanType:%  Cells:%  prod#:172  Target#:214  State#:%  Dir#:1
  wNotes=0  sortOrder:rid,rpid

 

Home Page