Magnetic Fields / OCR Cancer Research Results

MF, Magnetic Fields: Click to Expand ⟱

Features: Therapy

Magnetic Fields can be Static, or pulsed. The most common therapy is a pulsed magnetic field in the uT or mT range.
The main pathways affected are:
Calcium Signaling: -influence the activity of voltage-gated calcium channels.
Oxidative Stress and Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) Pathways
Heat Shock Proteins (HSPs) and Cellular Stress Responses
Cell Proliferation and Growth Signaling: MAPK/ERK pathway.
Gene Expression and Epigenetic Modifications: NF-κB
Angiogenesis Pathways: VEGF (improving VEGF for normal cells)
PEMF was found to have a 2-fold increase in drug uptake compared to traditional electrochemotherapy in rat melanoma models

Pathways:
- most reports have ROS production increasing in cancer cells , while decreasing in normal cells.
- ROS↑ related: MMP↓(ΔΨm), ER Stress↑, UPR↑, GRP78↑, Ca+2↑, Cyt‑c↑, Caspases↑, DNA damage↑, cl-PARP↑, HSP↓, Prx,
- Raises AntiOxidant defense in Normal Cells: ROS↓, NRF2↑, SOD↑, GSH↑, Catalase↑,
- lowers Inflammation : NF-kB↓, COX2↓, Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines : NLRP3↓, IL-1β↓, TNF-α↓, IL-6↓, IL-8↓
- inhibit Growth/Metastases : TumMeta↓, TumCG↓, VEGF↓(mostly regulated up in normal cells),
- cause Cell cycle arrest : TumCCA↑,
- inhibits Migration/Invasion : TumCMig↓, TumCI↓, TNF-α↓,
- inhibits glycolysis /Warburg Effect and ATP depletion : HIF-1α↓, PKM2↓, GLUT1↓, LDH↓, HK2↓, PFKs↓, PDKs↓, ECAR↓, OXPHOS↓, GRP78↑, Glucose↓, GlucoseCon↓
- inhibits angiogenesis↓ : VEGF↓, HIF-1α↓, Notch↓, FGF↓, PDGF↓, EGFR↓, Integrins↓,
- Others: PI3K↓, AKT↓, STAT↓, Wnt↓, β-catenin↓, ERK↓, JNK, - SREBP (related to cholesterol).
- Synergies: chemo-sensitization, chemoProtective, cytoProtective, RadioSensitizer, RadioProtective, Others(review target notes), Neuroprotective, Hepatoprotective, CardioProtective,

- Selectivity: Cancer Cells vs Normal Cells

Non-Static Magnetic Fields (AC / Pulsed / Oscillating MF)

Rank	Pathway / Axis	Cancer Cells	Normal Cells	TSF	Primary Effect	Notes / Interpretation
1	Reactive oxygen species (ROS)	↑ ROS (P→R); often sustained (G)	↑ ROS (P); ↔/↓ net ROS (R→G)	P, R, G	Upstream redox perturbation	MF perturbs electron/radical dynamics: normal cells often adapt (ROS setpoint ↓), cancer cells less so
2	NRF2 antioxidant response	↔ / insufficient NRF2 induction (R→G)	↑ NRF2 activation (R→G)	R, G	Adaptive redox defense	Explains mixed ROS direction in normal cells (initial ↑ then adaptive ↓)
3	Glutathione (GSH) homeostasis	↓ GSH (R→G)	↔ or transient ↓ (R) with recovery (G)	R, G	Redox buffering capacity	GSH depletion reflects sustained oxidative load; recovery indicates successful adaptation
4	Superoxide dismutase (SOD) / antioxidant enzymes	↔ or inadequate enzyme upshift (G)	↑ SOD/GPx/CAT capacity (G)	G	Longer-term antioxidant remodeling	Often the “endpoint” readout that correlates with ROS-normalization in normal tissue
5	Mitochondrial ETC / respiration	↓ ETC efficiency; ↑ electron leak (P→R)	↔ mild, reversible ETC perturbation (P→R)	P, R	Bioenergetic destabilization	ETC perturbation is a mechanistic bridge between MF exposure and ROS/ΔΨm changes
6	Mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm / MMP)	↓ ΔΨm (R); may progress (G)	↔ preserved or reversible dip (R)	R, G	Mitochondrial dysfunction thresholding	ΔΨm loss typically follows ROS/ETC disruption rather than preceding it
7	Ca²⁺ signaling (VGCC / ER–mitochondria Ca²⁺ flux)	↑ dysregulated Ca²⁺ influx/transfer (P→R); overload may persist (G)	↑ transient Ca²⁺ signaling (P); homeostasis restored (R→G)	P, R, G	Stress signal amplification	Ca²⁺ dysregulation links ROS/ETC perturbation to ER stress and mitochondrial dysfunction (amplifies ΔΨm loss and UPR commitment)
8	Mitochondrial permeability transition pore (MPTP)	↑ MPTP opening propensity (R); sustained opening possible (G)	↔ transient or closed (R→G)	P, R, G	Commitment point for mitochondrial failure	MPTP opening integrates ROS, Ca²⁺ overload, and ΔΨm loss; acts as a threshold event converting reversible stress into irreversible mitochondrial dysfunction
9	ER stress / UPR	↑ ER stress (R); CHOP-commitment possible (G)	↑ adaptive UPR (R); resolves (G)	R, G	Proteostasis stress	Often downstream of ROS + Ca²⁺ handling perturbations
10	DNA damage (oxidative)	↑ damage markers (R→G)	↔ or repaired (G)	R, G	Checkpoint pressure	Generally secondary to ROS; interpret as stress consequence not “direct genotoxicity”
11	LDH / glycolytic flux	↓ glycolytic performance (R→G)	↔ flexible substrate switching (R→G)	R, G	Metabolic vulnerability	Redox imbalance can destabilize high-rate glycolysis in cancer-biased contexts
12	Thioredoxin system (Trx / TrxR)	↓ functional reserve / overload (R→G)	↔ preserved capacity (G)	R, G	Parallel antioxidant system stress	Useful when GSH-only does not explain redox phenotype

Time-Scale Flag: TSF = P / R / G
  P: 0–30 min (physical / electron / radical effects)
  R: 30 min–3 hr (redox signaling & stress response)
  G: >3 hr (gene-regulatory adaptation)

MPTP: opening represents a mitochondrial commitment event integrating ROS and Ca²⁺ stress; sustained opening indicates irreversible bioenergetic failure.

OCR, Oxygen consumption rate: Click to Expand ⟱

Source:

Type:

Oxygen consumption rate (OCR) is a measure of the rate at which cells consume oxygen, and it has been found to be altered in cancer cells. Cancer cells often exhibit increased glycolysis, a process in which glucose is converted into energy without the use of oxygen, even in the presence of oxygen. This is known as the Warburg effect.
Cancer cells often exhibit increased glycolysis, which leads to a decrease in OCR.
-When mitochondrial function is impaired (resulting in lower OCR), cells may compensate by upregulating glycolysis to meet their energy needs (known as the Pasteur effect).
-Instruments such as the Seahorse Analyzer allow simultaneous measurement of OCR (reflecting mitochondrial respiration) and Extracellular Acidification Rate (ECAR, which is commonly used as a proxy for glycolysis). This dual measurement helps researchers understand how shifts in one pathway correlate with compensatory changes in the other.

Scientific Papers found: Click to Expand⟱

184-

MFrot,

MF,

Rotating Magnetic Fields Inhibit Mitochondrial Respiration, Promote Oxidative Stress and Produce Loss of Mitochondrial Integrity in Cancer Cells

in-vitro,

GBM,

GBM

 80mT pulsed

ROS↑, mitResp↓, mtDam↑, Dose↝, MMP?, OCR↓, mt-H2O2↑, eff↓, SDH↓, Thiols↓, GSH↓, TumCD↑, Casp3↑, Casp7↑, MPT↑, Cyt‑c↑, selectivity↑, GSH/GSSG↓, ETC↓,

Showing Research Papers: 1 to 1 of 1

* indicates research on normal cells as opposed to diseased cells
Total Research Paper Matches: 1

Pathway results for Effect on Cancer / Diseased Cells:

Drug Metabolism & Resistance ⓘ

Dose↝, 1, eff↓, 1, selectivity↑, 1,
Total Targets: 19

Pathway results for Effect on Normal Cells:

Total Targets: 0

Scientific Paper Hit Count for: OCR, Oxygen consumption rate

Query results interpretion may depend on "conditions" listed in the research papers.
Such Conditions may include : 
  -low or high Dose
  -format for product, such as nano of lipid formations
  -different cell line effects
  -synergies with other products 
  -if effect was for normal or cancerous cells

Filter Conditions: Pro/AntiFlg:%  IllCat:%  CanType:%  Cells:%  prod#:172  Target#:846  State#:%  Dir#:1
  wNotes=0  sortOrder:rid,rpid

Magnetic Fields / OCR Cancer Research Results

Pathway results for Effect on Cancer / Diseased Cells:

Redox & Oxidative Stress ⓘ

Mitochondria & Bioenergetics ⓘ

Cell Death ⓘ

Drug Metabolism & Resistance ⓘ

Pathway results for Effect on Normal Cells:

Home Page