| Features: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Gossypol is a natural compound found in cottonseed, a byproduct of the cotton industry. It has been studied for its potential anti-cancer properties. Research has shown that gossypol can inhibit the growth of various types of cancer cells, including breast, prostate, lung, and colon cancer. Gossypol's anti-cancer effects are thought to be due to its ability to: -Inhibit the activity of certain enzymes involved in cancer cell growth and survival -Induce apoptosis (cell death) in cancer cells -Inhibit the formation of new blood vessels that feed cancer cells (anti-angiogenesis) -Modulate the immune system to attack cancer cells Some studies have also suggested that gossypol may have synergistic effects when combined with other anti-cancer agents, such as chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Gossypol — a naturally occurring polyphenolic binaphthyl dialdehyde concentrated in the pigment glands of cotton plants (Gossypium spp.), particularly cottonseed. It is a plant-derived small-molecule bioactive compound and toxicant with two atropisomeric enantiomers. The R-(−) enantiomer, commonly termed (−)-gossypol or AT-101 when developed as gossypol acetic acid, has substantially greater anticancer activity than the S-(+) enantiomer and has been clinically investigated as an orally administered BH3-mimetic anticancer agent. Gossypol itself is not an approved anticancer drug; R-(−)-gossypol has FDA orphan-drug designation for chronic lymphocytic leukemia but has not received FDA approval for that indication. Cottonseed or crude cotton-derived material should not be considered equivalent to pharmaceutical AT-101 because gossypol content, stereochemistry, binding state, exposure, and toxicity are poorly controlled. Primary mechanisms (ranked):
Bioavailability / PK relevance: Gossypol and AT-101 have been administered orally in human cancer trials. Absorption is relatively slow and highly variable between individuals. In one clinical PK study using AT-101 40 mg twice daily, mean plasma Cmax was approximately 0.66 µg/mL, equivalent to about 1.3 µM, with individual values approximately 0.6–1.8 µM and a mean measured elimination half-life near 3.3 hours during the sampling interval. Other trials using 10–20 mg doses reported peaks of roughly 300–700 ng/mL around 1.5–2.5 hours. Gossypol is strongly protein-reactive/protein-bound and undergoes extensive tissue distribution, making total plasma concentration an imperfect surrogate for pharmacologically available intracellular exposure. Human pharmacokinetic behavior is heterogeneous and no validated therapeutic plasma concentration has been established. In-vitro vs systemic exposure relevance: Clinically achieved total plasma concentrations can reach the low-micromolar range and therefore overlap with some experiments demonstrating BCL-2-family inhibition, mitochondrial disruption and radiosensitization. However, many preclinical experiments use approximately 5–30 µM gossypol, which exceeds typical total human plasma exposure, sometimes substantially. Strong protein binding further reduces free-drug exposure. Mechanistic findings requiring high-micromolar concentrations should therefore be classified as high-concentration preclinical effects rather than assumed clinically achievable mechanisms. Clinical evidence status: Human Phase I and Phase II evidence exists for racemic gossypol and particularly AT-101, including monotherapy and combinations with docetaxel, cisplatin/etoposide, paclitaxel/carboplatin, radiation/temozolomide, and lenalidomide/dexamethasone. Several randomized studies failed to demonstrate significant survival improvement, and multiple development programs were stopped for lack of prespecified efficacy. More recent small studies have shown potentially useful activity in selected settings, including a 10-patient relapsed/refractory multiple-myeloma study and trials in glioblastoma, but these remain exploratory. Overall classification: clinical investigational; Phase I/II human evidence; no established standard-of-care indication and no FDA anticancer approval. Dose-limiting and clinically relevant toxicities have included gastrointestinal toxicity, hepatic enzyme elevation, cytopenias in combination regimens, electrolyte disturbances including hypokalemia, and reproductive toxicity with suppression of spermatogenesis. Gossypol Cancer-Relevant Mechanisms
|
| Source: |
| Type: |
| Oxidative phosphorylation (or phosphorylation) is the fourth and final step in cellular respiration. Alterations in phosphorylation pathways result in serious outcomes in cancer. Many signalling pathways including Tyrosine kinase, MAP kinase, Cadherin-catenin complex, Cyclin-dependent kinase etc. are major players of the cell cycle and deregulation in their phosphorylation-dephosphorylation cascade has been shown to be manifested in the form of various types of cancers. Many tumors exhibit a well-known metabolic shift known as the Warburg effect, where glycolysis is favored over OxPhos even in the presence of oxygen. However, this is not universal. Many cancers, including certain subpopulations like cancer stem cells, still rely on OXPHOS for energy production, biosynthesis, and survival. – In several cancers, especially during metastasis or in tumors with high metabolic plasticity, OxPhos can remain active or even be upregulated to meet energy demands. In some cancers, high OxPhos activity correlates with aggressive features, resistance to standard therapies, and poor outcomes, particularly when tumor cells exploit mitochondrial metabolism for survival and metastasis. – Conversely, low OxPhos activity can be associated with a reliance on glycolysis, which is also linked with rapid tumor growth and certain adverse prognostic features. Inhibiting oxidative phosphorylation is not a universal strategy against all cancers. Targeting OXPHOS can potentially disrupt the metabolic flexibility of cancer cells, leading to their death or making them more susceptible to other treatments. Since normal cells also rely on OXPHOS, inhibitors must be carefully targeted to avoid significant toxicity to healthy tissues. Not all tumors are the same. Some may be more glycolytic, while others depend more on mitochondrial metabolism. Therefore, metabolic profiling of tumors is crucial before adopting this strategy. Inhibiting OXPHOS is being explored in combination with other treatments (such as chemo- or immunotherapies) to improve efficacy and overcome resistance. In cancer cells, metabolic reprogramming is a hallmark where cells often rely on glycolysis (known as the Warburg effect); however, many cancer types also depend on OXPHOS for energy production and survival. Targeting OXPHOS(using inhibitor) to increase the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) can selectively induce oxidative stress and cell death in cancer cells. -One side effect of increased OXPHOS is the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). -Many cancer cells therefore simultaneously upregulate antioxidant systems to mitigate the damaging effects of elevated ROS. -Increase in oxidative phosphorylation can inhibit cancer growth. |
| 7321- | Gos, | The potential roles of gossypol as anticancer agent: advances and future directions |
| - | Review, | Var, | NA |
Query results interpretion may depend on "conditions" listed in the research papers. Such Conditions may include : -low or high Dose -format for product, such as nano of lipid formations -different cell line effects -synergies with other products -if effect was for normal or cancerous cells
Filter Conditions: Pro/AntiFlg:% IllCat:% CanType:% Cells:% prod#:234 Target#:230 State#:% Dir#:1
wNotes=0 sortOrder:rid,rpid