Gossypol/AT-101 / TumCI Cancer Research Results

Gos, Gossypol/AT-101: Click to Expand ⟱
Features:
Gossypol is a natural compound found in cottonseed, a byproduct of the cotton industry. It has been studied for its potential anti-cancer properties. Research has shown that gossypol can inhibit the growth of various types of cancer cells, including breast, prostate, lung, and colon cancer.

Gossypol's anti-cancer effects are thought to be due to its ability to:

-Inhibit the activity of certain enzymes involved in cancer cell growth and survival
-Induce apoptosis (cell death) in cancer cells
-Inhibit the formation of new blood vessels that feed cancer cells (anti-angiogenesis)
-Modulate the immune system to attack cancer cells

Some studies have also suggested that gossypol may have synergistic effects when combined with other anti-cancer agents, such as chemotherapy and radiation therapy.

Gossypol — a naturally occurring polyphenolic binaphthyl dialdehyde concentrated in the pigment glands of cotton plants (Gossypium spp.), particularly cottonseed. It is a plant-derived small-molecule bioactive compound and toxicant with two atropisomeric enantiomers. The R-(−) enantiomer, commonly termed (−)-gossypol or AT-101 when developed as gossypol acetic acid, has substantially greater anticancer activity than the S-(+) enantiomer and has been clinically investigated as an orally administered BH3-mimetic anticancer agent. Gossypol itself is not an approved anticancer drug; R-(−)-gossypol has FDA orphan-drug designation for chronic lymphocytic leukemia but has not received FDA approval for that indication. Cottonseed or crude cotton-derived material should not be considered equivalent to pharmaceutical AT-101 because gossypol content, stereochemistry, binding state, exposure, and toxicity are poorly controlled.

Primary mechanisms (ranked):

  1. BH3-mimetic inhibition of anti-apoptotic BCL-2-family proteins, particularly BCL-2, BCL-XL and MCL-1, releasing pro-apoptotic BAX/BAK signaling and lowering the mitochondrial apoptotic threshold.
  2. Mitochondrial dysfunction and intrinsic apoptosis, including mitochondrial outer-membrane permeabilization, loss of membrane potential, impaired respiration and ATP production, cytochrome-c-associated caspase activation, and apoptotic cell death.
  3. Disruption of BCL-2/Beclin-1 and BCL-XL/Beclin-1 complexes, permitting Beclin-1-dependent autophagy; the contribution of autophagy to tumor-cell death versus survival is context-dependent.
  4. Inhibition of lactate dehydrogenase and other dehydrogenases, producing reduced glycolytic lactate formation and metabolic stress; this is pharmacologically established but appears less central to modern clinical development than BCL-2-family antagonism.
  5. Chemosensitization and radiosensitization through lowering of the apoptotic threshold, particularly in tumors dependent on BCL-2/BCL-XL/MCL-1 survival signaling.
  6. ROS and oxidative-stress modulation (secondary, context-dependent); increased ROS contributes to cytotoxicity in some tumor models, whereas other models demonstrate ROS-independent mitochondrial apoptosis.
  7. Suppression of tumor growth, angiogenic signaling and selected invasion-associated pathways in preclinical models, including reductions in VEGF-related signaling in some systems; these are secondary and tumor-model-dependent effects.

Bioavailability / PK relevance: Gossypol and AT-101 have been administered orally in human cancer trials. Absorption is relatively slow and highly variable between individuals. In one clinical PK study using AT-101 40 mg twice daily, mean plasma Cmax was approximately 0.66 µg/mL, equivalent to about 1.3 µM, with individual values approximately 0.6–1.8 µM and a mean measured elimination half-life near 3.3 hours during the sampling interval. Other trials using 10–20 mg doses reported peaks of roughly 300–700 ng/mL around 1.5–2.5 hours. Gossypol is strongly protein-reactive/protein-bound and undergoes extensive tissue distribution, making total plasma concentration an imperfect surrogate for pharmacologically available intracellular exposure. Human pharmacokinetic behavior is heterogeneous and no validated therapeutic plasma concentration has been established.

In-vitro vs systemic exposure relevance: Clinically achieved total plasma concentrations can reach the low-micromolar range and therefore overlap with some experiments demonstrating BCL-2-family inhibition, mitochondrial disruption and radiosensitization. However, many preclinical experiments use approximately 5–30 µM gossypol, which exceeds typical total human plasma exposure, sometimes substantially. Strong protein binding further reduces free-drug exposure. Mechanistic findings requiring high-micromolar concentrations should therefore be classified as high-concentration preclinical effects rather than assumed clinically achievable mechanisms.

Clinical evidence status: Human Phase I and Phase II evidence exists for racemic gossypol and particularly AT-101, including monotherapy and combinations with docetaxel, cisplatin/etoposide, paclitaxel/carboplatin, radiation/temozolomide, and lenalidomide/dexamethasone. Several randomized studies failed to demonstrate significant survival improvement, and multiple development programs were stopped for lack of prespecified efficacy. More recent small studies have shown potentially useful activity in selected settings, including a 10-patient relapsed/refractory multiple-myeloma study and trials in glioblastoma, but these remain exploratory. Overall classification: clinical investigational; Phase I/II human evidence; no established standard-of-care indication and no FDA anticancer approval. Dose-limiting and clinically relevant toxicities have included gastrointestinal toxicity, hepatic enzyme elevation, cytopenias in combination regimens, electrolyte disturbances including hypokalemia, and reproductive toxicity with suppression of spermatogenesis.

Gossypol Cancer-Relevant Mechanisms

Rank Pathway / Axis Cancer Cells Normal Cells Primary Effect Notes / Interpretation
1 BCL-2 / BCL-XL / MCL-1 survival signaling ↓ (context-dependent) BH3-mimetic displacement of pro-apoptotic BCL-2-family partners Principal anticancer mechanism of R-(−)-gossypol / AT-101. Tumors dependent on anti-apoptotic BCL-2-family proteins may be preferentially susceptible.
2 Mitochondrial apoptosis ↑ (dose-dependent) Mitochondrial permeabilization, membrane-potential loss and caspase-associated apoptosis Closely linked to BCL-2-family inhibition. Therapeutic selectivity is incomplete and depends on cellular BCL-2-family dependence and exposure.
3 Mitochondrial bioenergetics ↓ (dose-dependent) Reduced mitochondrial respiration and ATP production Demonstrated experimentally with AT-101 and may augment apoptotic stress. High exposure can also impair normal-cell mitochondrial function.
4 BCL-2 / Beclin-1 autophagy control ↓ BCL-2–Beclin-1 binding
↑ autophagy
↔ / ↑ (context-dependent) Release of Beclin-1 and induction of autophagic signaling Particularly described in apoptosis-resistant, BCL-2-high prostate cancer. Autophagy may contribute to cell death or cellular adaptation depending on model.
5 LDH-dependent glycolysis and lactate production ↓ (dose-dependent) Dehydrogenase inhibition and reduced lactate-forming glycolytic flux Gossypol is a recognized LDH inhibitor, but this mechanism has received less clinical validation than BH3-mimetic activity.
6 Chemosensitization ↔ / ↑ toxicity (context-dependent) Lowers apoptotic threshold to cytotoxic agents Synergy or enhanced cytotoxicity has been demonstrated with cisplatin, taxanes, etoposide, bortezomib and other agents preclinically. Human combination trials have produced mixed efficacy.
7 Radiosensitization ↔ / ↑ toxicity (context-dependent) Enhances radiation-associated tumor-cell killing Low-micromolar AT-101 concentrations can radiosensitize tumor models, and clinically measured plasma concentrations have overlapped this range in some studies.
8 Oxidative and mitochondrial ROS stress ↑ (model-dependent) ↑ (high concentration only) Oxidative stress contributing to apoptosis in selected tumor models Secondary mechanism. ROS induction is not universal; ROS-independent mitochondrial apoptosis has also been demonstrated.
9 Angiogenic signaling ↓ (model-dependent) ↓ (context-dependent) Reduced angiogenic signaling and tumor vascular support VEGF and related angiogenic markers decrease in selected preclinical models. Evidence is substantially weaker than for BCL-2-family antagonism.
10 Clinical Translation Constraint ↓ therapeutic margin Exposure variability, protein binding, toxicity and limited demonstrated efficacy Oral absorption is variable; many in-vitro studies use concentrations above typical systemic exposure. Reproductive toxicity, gastrointestinal toxicity, hepatic effects, electrolyte abnormalities and hematologic toxicity constrain dosing. Multiple randomized Phase II programs failed to improve major clinical outcomes.


TumCI, Tumor Cell invasion: Click to Expand ⟱
Source:
Type:
Tumor cell invasion is a critical process in cancer progression and metastasis, where cancer cells spread from the primary tumor to surrounding tissues and distant organs. This process involves several key steps and mechanisms:

1.Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT): Many tumors originate from epithelial cells, which are typically organized in layers. During EMT, these cells lose their epithelial characteristics (such as cell-cell adhesion) and gain mesenchymal traits (such as increased motility). This transition is crucial for invasion.

2.Degradation of Extracellular Matrix (ECM): Tumor cells secrete enzymes, such as matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), that degrade the ECM, allowing cancer cells to invade surrounding tissues. This degradation facilitates the movement of cancer cells through the tissue.

3.Cell Migration: Once the ECM is degraded, cancer cells can migrate. They often use various mechanisms, including amoeboid movement and mesenchymal migration, to move through the tissue. This migration is influenced by various signaling pathways and the tumor microenvironment.

4.Angiogenesis: As tumors grow, they require a blood supply to provide nutrients and oxygen. Tumor cells can stimulate the formation of new blood vessels (angiogenesis) through the release of growth factors like vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). This not only supports tumor growth but also provides a route for cancer cells to enter the bloodstream.

5.Invasion into Blood Vessels (Intravasation): Cancer cells can invade nearby blood vessels, allowing them to enter the circulatory system. This step is crucial for metastasis, as it enables cancer cells to travel to distant sites in the body.

6.Survival in Circulation: Once in the bloodstream, cancer cells must survive the immune response and the shear stress of blood flow. They can form clusters with platelets or other cells to evade detection.

7.Extravasation and Colonization: After traveling through the bloodstream, cancer cells can exit the circulation (extravasation) and invade new tissues. They may then establish secondary tumors (metastases) in distant organs.

8.Tumor Microenvironment: The surrounding microenvironment plays a significant role in tumor invasion. Factors such as immune cells, fibroblasts, and signaling molecules can either promote or inhibit invasion and metastasis.


Scientific Papers found: Click to Expand⟱
7321- Gos,    The potential roles of gossypol as anticancer agent: advances and future directions
- Review, Var, NA
other↝, BioAv↑, Bcl-2↓, Casp3↑, Casp9↑, MOMP↑, ROS↑, ATP↓, mtDam↑, Apoptosis↑, hTERT/TERT↓, Akt↓, TumAuto↑, LC3‑Ⅱ/LC3‑Ⅰ↑, NRF2↓, ARE↓, ICAM-1↓, CX43/GJA1↓, NF-kB↓, TLR4↓, IL6↓, Inflam↓, CUL5↝, CUL1↝, NOXA↑, TumCI↓, TumCMig↓, TumCA↓, FAK↓, MDM2↓, VEGF↓, angioG↓, HLA-I/II↑, Imm↑, Dose↝, Glycolysis↓, OXPHOS↓,

Showing Research Papers: 1 to 1 of 1

* indicates research on normal cells as opposed to diseased cells
Total Research Paper Matches: 1

Pathway results for Effect on Cancer / Diseased Cells:


NA, unassigned(tgid=0)

CUL1↝, 1,   CUL5↝, 1,   CX43/GJA1↓, 1,   HLA-I/II↑, 1,  

Redox & Oxidative Stress(tgid=1)

ARE↓, 1,   NRF2↓, 1,   OXPHOS↓, 1,   ROS↑, 1,  

Mitochondria & Bioenergetics(tgid=3)

ATP↓, 1,   mtDam↑, 1,  

Core Metabolism/Glycolysis(tgid=4)

Glycolysis↓, 1,  

Cell Death(tgid=5)

Akt↓, 1,   Apoptosis↑, 1,   Bcl-2↓, 1,   Casp3↑, 1,   Casp9↑, 1,   hTERT/TERT↓, 1,   MDM2↓, 1,   MOMP↑, 1,   NOXA↑, 1,  

Transcription & Epigenetics(tgid=7)

other↝, 1,  

Autophagy & Lysosomes(tgid=9)

LC3‑Ⅱ/LC3‑Ⅰ↑, 1,   TumAuto↑, 1,  

Migration(tgid=13)

FAK↓, 1,   TumCA↓, 1,   TumCI↓, 1,   TumCMig↓, 1,  

Angiogenesis & Vasculature(tgid=14)

angioG↓, 1,   VEGF↓, 1,  

Immune & Inflammatory Signaling(tgid=16)

ICAM-1↓, 1,   IL6↓, 1,   Imm↑, 1,   Inflam↓, 1,   NF-kB↓, 1,   TLR4↓, 1,  

Drug Metabolism & Resistance(tgid=21)

BioAv↑, 1,   Dose↝, 1,  

Clinical Biomarkers(tgid=22)

hTERT/TERT↓, 1,   IL6↓, 1,  
Total Targets: 39

Pathway results for Effect on Normal Cells:


Total Targets: 0

Scientific Paper Hit Count for: TumCI, Tumor Cell invasion
Query results interpretion may depend on "conditions" listed in the research papers.
Such Conditions may include : 
  -low or high Dose
  -format for product, such as nano of lipid formations
  -different cell line effects
  -synergies with other products 
  -if effect was for normal or cancerous cells
Filter Conditions: Pro/AntiFlg:%  IllCat:%  CanType:%  Cells:%  prod#:234  Target#:324  State#:%  Dir#:1
wNotes=0 sortOrder:rid,rpid

 

Home Page