| Rank |
Pathway / Axis |
Cancer Cells |
Normal Cells |
Primary Effect |
Notes / Interpretation |
| 1 |
PAK1 / AKT / mTOR |
PAK1 ↓ AKT ↓ mTOR ↓ Autophagic flux ↑ |
↔ / not established |
Cytostatic autophagy and reduced proliferation |
Strong mechanistic evidence in breast-cancer models; ivermectin promotes ubiquitination-mediated degradation of PAK1 with subsequent suppression of AKT/mTOR signaling. |
| 2 |
Mitochondrial bioenergetics |
Mitochondrial membrane potential ↓ Mitochondrial respiration ↓ ATP ↓ |
↔ / ↓ (high exposure) |
Bioenergetic failure and apoptosis |
Demonstrated particularly in renal, colorectal and esophageal cancer models. Preferential effects over corresponding normal cells have been reported in some models but should not be generalized to all tissues. |
| 3 |
Mitochondrial ROS and oxidative damage |
ROS ↑ (dose-dependent) |
↔ / ↑ (high exposure) |
Oxidative stress and intrinsic apoptosis |
ROS is principally a downstream consequence of mitochondrial dysfunction rather than a universal primary molecular target. NAC or mitochondrial metabolic rescue can attenuate ivermectin cytotoxicity in several experimental systems. |
| 4 |
WNT / β-catenin / TCF |
WNT-TCF transcription ↓ β-catenin signaling ↓ CCND1 ↓ |
↔ / not established |
Reduced proliferation and WNT-dependent tumor growth |
Well-characterized preclinical repurposing mechanism, particularly relevant to tumors dependent on canonical WNT-TCF signaling. |
| 5 |
Hippo / YAP1 / CTGF |
YAP1 ↓ YAP1 nuclear localization ↓ CTGF ↓ (model-dependent) |
↔ / not established |
Reduced oncogenic transcription and proliferation |
Demonstrated in gastric and other YAP-dependent cancer models. Sensitivity is heterogeneous, and recent organoid work indicates substantial tumor-to-tumor and time-dependent variation. |
| 6 |
ATP / P2X4 / P2X7 immune signaling |
Immunogenic cell death ↑ |
Antitumor T-cell activity ↑ Immunosuppressive populations ↓ (model-dependent) |
Conversion toward an immunologically active tumor microenvironment |
Preclinical breast-cancer studies provide the rationale for combining ivermectin with PD-1 pathway inhibition. Human therapeutic benefit remains unproven. |
| 7 |
Chloride-dependent membrane signaling |
Intracellular Cl⁻ ↑ Membrane hyperpolarization ↑ Cell death ↑ |
Lower effect (model-dependent) |
Preferential leukemia-cell cytotoxicity |
One of the earliest experimentally demonstrated anticancer mechanisms. Evidence is strongest in leukemia and should not be assumed to be dominant in solid tumors. |
| 8 |
JAK / STAT signaling |
JAK2 ↓ p-STAT3 ↓ p-STAT5 ↓ (model-dependent) |
↔ / not established |
Reduced survival and metabolic signaling |
Demonstrated in selected models including glioma; not established as a universal ivermectin target across cancer types. |
| 9 |
Glycolytic metabolism |
GLUT4 ↓ HK2 ↓ PFK1 ↓ Pyruvate ↓ ATP ↓ (model-dependent) |
↔ / ↓ (high concentration only) |
Reduced glycolytic capacity and enhanced metabolic stress |
Strongly demonstrated in particular glioma models through GLUT4/JAK/STAT signaling, but insufficient evidence supports treating glycolysis as a universal primary ivermectin mechanism. |
| 10 |
Intrinsic apoptosis |
Bax ↑ Bcl-2 ↓ Caspase activity ↑ PARP cleavage ↑ |
↔ / ↑ (high exposure) |
Programmed tumor-cell death |
Common downstream phenotype following mitochondrial dysfunction, ROS accumulation and signaling disruption. |
| 11 |
Importin α / β nuclear transport |
Importin-dependent nuclear transport ↓ |
↓ (exposure-dependent) |
Reduced nuclear localization of susceptible cargo |
Biochemically important ivermectin activity, but it is not cancer-cell-specific and its contribution to antitumor effects varies by substrate and tumor context. |
| 12 |
HIF hypoxia signaling |
HIF-1α nuclear localization ↓ HIF transcription ↓ (model-dependent) |
↓ (context-dependent) |
Reduced cellular hypoxia-response transcription |
Likely linked partly to importin α/β inhibition. Relevant in hypoxic models but not sufficiently universal to rank as a core ivermectin anticancer mechanism. |
| 13 |
Cancer stemness and invasion |
Stemness ↓ Migration ↓ Invasion ↓ (model-dependent) |
↔ / not established |
Reduced aggressive tumor phenotype |
Reported across several preclinical systems and probably reflects convergence of WNT, YAP, AKT and related pathways rather than a single direct target. |
| 14 |
NRF2 antioxidant response |
↔ / context-dependent |
↔ / context-dependent |
Not established as a core ivermectin mechanism |
Evidence is insufficient to assign a consistent ivermectin-induced NRF2 direction across cancers. It should not currently be presented as a standard ivermectin pathway. |
| 15 |
Clinical Translation Constraint |
Effective experimental exposure often exceeds standard human exposure |
Neurotoxicity and systemic toxicity risk ↑ with excessive exposure |
Limits translation of direct in-vitro cytotoxicity |
Standard oral dosing produces approximately 0.04–0.06 µM peak plasma concentrations, whereas many cancer-cell experiments use several µM. CYP3A4 metabolism, food-dependent exposure, P-glycoprotein-mediated CNS protection, concomitant drugs and repeated high dosing are important clinical constraints. Current oncology studies are investigational and efficacy remains unconfirmed. |