Licorice / ROS Cancer Research Results

LE, Licorice: Click to Expand ⟱
Features:
Glycyrrhizic acid (GA) is a significant constituent of licorice root.
Glycyrrhizin, the main active component obtained from licorice roots, has many pharmacological and biological functions such as protecting liver cells, anti-inflammation, anti-virus, immunomodulation, has been widely applied in the treatment of clinically related hepatic diseases (Dastagir & Rizvi, 2016). Glycyrrhizin is a natural inhibitor of HMGB1

Licorice — Licorice is the dried root and stolon of Glycyrrhiza species, principally Glycyrrhiza glabra, G. uralensis, and G. inflata, used as a botanical medicine and food ingredient. It is a complex phytochemical mixture rather than a single drug. Major bioactive classes include the triterpenoid saponin glycyrrhizin (glycyrrhizic acid), its intestinal metabolite 18β-glycyrrhetinic acid, and numerous flavonoids and chalcones including liquiritigenin, isoliquiritigenin, glabridin, and species-dependent licochalcones. Standard abbreviations include LE for licorice extract and GL for glycyrrhizin. Anticancer findings are predominantly preclinical and depend strongly on species, extract preparation, constituent composition, and concentration. Glycyrrhizin is particularly important because it directly binds and inhibits extracellular HMGB1 signaling, while several flavonoid constituents contribute additional antiproliferative effects.

Primary mechanisms (ranked):

  1. HMGB1 inhibition and suppression of HMGB1-driven inflammatory, proliferative, angiogenic, and metastatic signaling, principally attributable to glycyrrhizin.
  2. Suppression of tumor proliferation and cell-cycle progression, including modulation of cyclins/CDKs and, in some models, induction of S-phase or other cell-cycle arrest.
  3. Induction of cancer-cell death through mitochondrial apoptosis, caspase activation, altered BAX/BCL-2 balance, autophagy, or necrotic mechanisms depending on extract and tumor model.
  4. Suppression of EMT, migration, invasion, and associated TGF-β/SMAD, cadherin, and extracellular-matrix signaling.
  5. Suppression of PI3K/AKT/mTOR, STAT3, NF-κB, and related survival/inflammatory signaling in constituent- and model-dependent studies.
  6. Oxidative-redox modulation (secondary): some licorice constituents increase tumor-cell ROS sufficiently to promote cell death, whereas licorice can decrease oxidative stress and activate antioxidant defenses including NRF2 in non-malignant tissues.
  7. Modulation of DNA-damage responses; glycyrrhizin-HMGB1 inhibition can impair NHEJ-associated DNA repair and increase DNA damage in colorectal cancer models.
  8. Anti-angiogenic signaling through reductions in VEGF/HIF-1α and related pathways in selected preclinical systems.

Bioavailability / PK relevance: Oral glycyrrhizin has low systemic exposure as intact glycyrrhizin and undergoes extensive metabolism by intestinal microbiota to glycyrrhetinic acid and additional metabolites. In a human study using a 75-mg oral glycyrrhizin dose, mean glycyrrhizin peak plasma concentration was approximately 25 ng/mL while glycyrrhetinic acid reached approximately 200 ng/mL. Consequently, systemic biology after oral licorice can differ markedly from direct exposure experiments using glycyrrhizin or crude extract. Formulation, intestinal microbiota, biliary transport, species of licorice, glycyrrhizin content, and concomitant botanicals can materially alter exposure.

In-vitro vs systemic exposure relevance: Many anticancer experiments expose cells directly to licorice extracts or purified constituents at tens to hundreds of µg/mL or micromolar concentrations. These exposures frequently exceed circulating concentrations achievable after conventional oral licorice or glycyrrhizin administration. For example, recent whole-extract studies reported substantial antiproliferative effects around 30–200 µg/mL, whereas orally administered glycyrrhizin produces plasma levels in the ng/mL range and is extensively converted to metabolites. Whole-extract in-vitro anticancer potency should therefore not be interpreted as demonstrating equivalent systemic antitumor exposure in humans.

Clinical evidence status: Preclinical for treatment or prevention of cancer. Cell and animal evidence supports several anticancer mechanisms, particularly glycyrrhizin-HMGB1 signaling and constituent-dependent antiproliferative effects. Small human / RCT adjunct evidence exists for supportive care rather than tumor treatment; randomized studies have reported reduced pain and severity of radiotherapy-associated oral mucositis with topical licorice preparations. There is no established clinical evidence that oral licorice treats human malignancy or improves cancer survival.

Safety / translation relevance: Glycyrrhizin-containing licorice has a clinically important dose- and duration-dependent mineralocorticoid-like toxicity. Glycyrrhetinic-acid-related metabolites inhibit renal 11β-HSD2, permitting cortisol activation of mineralocorticoid receptors and potentially causing sodium retention, hypertension, edema, hypokalemia, metabolic alkalosis, arrhythmias, and suppression of renin and aldosterone. Risk increases with prolonged exposure and can be influenced by intestinal microbiota, renal/hepatic function, albumin concentration, age, and interacting medications. Licorice can also alter drug metabolism and should not be assumed pharmacologically inert when used with cancer therapy.

Licorice Mechanistic Profile

Rank Pathway / Axis Cancer Cells Normal Cells Primary Effect Notes / Interpretation
1 HMGB1 inflammatory signaling HMGB1 signaling ↓; inflammatory signaling ↓; proliferation ↓; migration ↓ HMGB1-mediated inflammation ↓ Suppresses inflammatory and tumor-promoting extracellular signaling One of the most defensible licorice mechanisms because glycyrrhizin directly binds HMGB1. Particularly relevant to inflammation-associated tumor progression.
2 Cell cycle and proliferation Proliferation ↓; Cyclin D1 ↓; CDK4 ↓; cell-cycle arrest ↑ ↔ (context-dependent) Restrains tumor-cell expansion Demonstrated with whole licorice extracts and purified constituents. Exact checkpoint differs by preparation and tumor model.
3 Mitochondrial apoptosis and cell death BAX ↑; BCL-2 ↓; caspase-3 ↑; apoptosis ↑; necrosis ↑ (model-dependent) Apoptotic injury generally ↓ under oxidative or inflammatory stress (context-dependent) Promotes tumor-cell death Mode of death is extract-dependent. Recent whole-root extract studies demonstrate both apoptotic signatures and predominantly necrotic death in different cancer models.
4 EMT and metastatic signaling EMT ↓; migration ↓; invasion ↓; N-cadherin ↓; E-cadherin ↑; SMAD2/3 signaling ↓ Pathological EMT ↓ (context-dependent) Reduces invasive phenotype Glycyrrhizin-HMGB1 inhibition is particularly relevant; effects have been demonstrated in prostate and epithelial models.
5 PI3K AKT mTOR and STAT3 survival signaling PI3K ↓; AKT ↓; mTOR ↓; STAT3 ↓ (constituent-dependent) ↔ / mixed Reduces survival and growth signaling Strong evidence exists for several purified licorice flavonoids, but attribution to generic licorice extract should remain context-dependent because constituent composition varies markedly.
6 DNA damage response and NHEJ HMGB1 ↓; NHEJ ↓; DNA fragmentation ↑; DNA-damage response altered Not established Reduces repair capacity and promotes tumor-cell injury Recent colorectal-cancer evidence specifically implicates glycyrrhizin-mediated inhibition of HMGB1 and NHEJ-associated repair.
7 ROS and oxidative stress ROS ↑ or ↓ (constituent-dependent); oxidative stress ↑ can promote apoptosis ROS ↓; antioxidant defenses ↑ Bidirectional redox modulation ROS ↑ should not be treated as a universal whole-licorice effect. Pro-oxidant tumor effects are particularly associated with selected chalcones/flavonoids, whereas antioxidant effects predominate in many normal-tissue models.
8 NRF2 antioxidant defense Mixed (context-dependent) NRF2 ↑; HO-1 ↑; SOD ↑; catalase ↑; GPx ↑ Protects normal tissues from oxidative injury Secondary mechanism. Potentially beneficial for tissue protection, but persistent NRF2 activation in established cancers can theoretically support stress resistance; tumor context matters.
9 Angiogenesis and hypoxic signaling VEGF ↓; HIF-1α ↓; CD31 ↓ (model-dependent) ↔ / not established Reduces tumor vascular signaling Preclinical and constituent-dependent; should not be interpreted as established systemic anti-angiogenic activity in humans.
10 Autophagy Beclin-1 ↑; LC3-II/LC3-I ↑; p62 ↓ (model-dependent) Mixed Can contribute to growth suppression or cell death Observed with selected licorice extracts and constituents. Functional consequence depends on whether autophagy is cytotoxic or adaptive in the specific model.
11 Chemosensitization Antiproliferative effect ↑ with selected chemotherapy combinations Toxicity modulation mixed Potential adjunctive interaction Preclinical combination studies include enhanced effects with doxorubicin/adriamycin. Human anticancer benefit has not been demonstrated, and pharmacokinetic interactions remain a concern.
12 Drug metabolism and CYP interactions Drug exposure ↔ / altered CYP activity ↓ or altered (species- and preparation-dependent) Changes exposure to concomitant compounds Clinically relevant because licorice preparations differ in constituent profiles. Interaction potential should be evaluated separately from anticancer mechanisms.
13 11β-HSD2 mineralocorticoid axis Not a therapeutic anticancer mechanism 11β-HSD2 ↓; cortisol-mediated mineralocorticoid receptor activity ↑; potassium ↓; blood pressure ↑ Major systemic toxicity constraint Driven principally by glycyrrhizin metabolites including glycyrrhetinic-acid derivatives. Clinically established and more relevant to achievable oral exposure than many in-vitro anticancer targets.
14 Clinical Translation Constraint Direct extract exposure commonly exceeds achievable systemic levels Systemic glycyrrhizin metabolites can produce dose-limiting endocrine and cardiovascular effects Limits translation of in-vitro anticancer activity Whole-extract composition, intestinal metabolism, low intact-glycyrrhizin exposure, species differences, CYP interactions, and pseudoaldosteronism make dose extrapolation particularly uncertain.


ROS, Reactive Oxygen Species: Click to Expand ⟱
Source: HalifaxProj (inhibit)
Type:
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are highly reactive molecules that contain oxygen and can lead to oxidative stress in cells. They play a dual role in cancer biology, acting as both promoters and suppressors of cancer.
ROS can cause oxidative damage to DNA, leading to mutations that may contribute to cancer initiation and progression. So normally you want to inhibit ROS to prevent cell mutations.
However excessive ROS can induce apoptosis (programmed cell death) in cancer cells, potentially limiting tumor growth. Chemotherapy typically raises ROS.
-mitochondria is the main source of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (and the ETC is heavily related)
ROS Homeostasis in Cancer Cells and Its Potential as a Therapeutic Target

"Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are two electron reduction products of oxygen, including superoxide anion, hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl radical, lipid peroxides, protein peroxides and peroxides formed in nucleic acids 1. They are maintained in a dynamic balance by a series of reduction-oxidation (redox) reactions in biological systems and act as signaling molecules to drive cellular regulatory pathways."
"During different stages of cancer formation, abnormal ROS levels play paradoxical roles in cell growth and death 8. A physiological concentration of ROS that maintained in equilibrium is necessary for normal cell survival. Ectopic ROS accumulation promotes cell proliferation and consequently induces malignant transformation of normal cells by initiating pathological conversion of physiological signaling networks. Excessive ROS levels lead to cell death by damaging cellular components, including proteins, lipid bilayers, and chromosomes. Therefore, both scavenging abnormally elevated ROS to prevent early neoplasia and facilitating ROS production to specifically kill cancer cells are promising anticancer therapeutic strategies, in spite of their contradictoriness and complexity."
"ROS are the collection of derivatives of molecular oxygen that occur in biology, which can be categorized into two types, free radicals and non-radical species. The non-radical species are hydrogen peroxide (H 2O 2 ), organic hydroperoxides (ROOH), singlet molecular oxygen ( 1 O 2 ), electronically excited carbonyl, ozone (O3 ), hypochlorous acid (HOCl, and hypobromous acid HOBr). Free radical species are super-oxide anion radical (O 2•−), hydroxyl radical (•OH), peroxyl radical (ROO•) and alkoxyl radical (RO•) [130]. Any imbalance of ROS can lead to adverse effects. H2 O 2 and O 2 •− are the main redox signalling agents. The cellular concentration of H2 O 2 is about 10−8 M, which is almost a thousand times more than that of O2 •−".
"Radicals are molecules with an odd number of electrons in the outer shell [393,394]. A pair of radicals can be formed by breaking a chemical bond or electron transfer between two molecules."

Recent investigations have documented that polyphenols with good antioxidant activity may exhibit pro-oxidant activity in the presence of copper ions, which can induce apoptosis in various cancer cell lines but not in normal cells. "We have shown that such cell growth inhibition by polyphenols in cancer cells is reversed by copper-specific sequestering agent neocuproine to a significant extent whereas iron and zinc chelators are relatively ineffective, thus confirming the role of endogenous copper in the cytotoxic action of polyphenols against cancer cells. Therefore, this mechanism of mobilization of endogenous copper." > Ions could be one of the important mechanisms for the cytotoxic action of plant polyphenols against cancer cells and is possibly a common mechanism for all plant polyphenols. In fact, similar results obtained with four different polyphenolic compounds in this study, namely apigenin, luteolin, EGCG, and resveratrol, strengthen this idea.
Interestingly, the normal breast epithelial MCF10A cells have earlier been shown to possess no detectable copper as opposed to breast cancer cells [24], which may explain their resistance to polyphenols apigenin- and luteolin-induced growth inhibition as observed here (Fig. 1). We have earlier proposed [25] that this preferential cytotoxicity of plant polyphenols toward cancer cells is explained by the observation made several years earlier, which showed that copper levels in cancer cells are significantly elevated in various malignancies. Thus, because of higher intracellular copper levels in cancer cells, it may be predicted that the cytotoxic concentrations of polyphenols required would be lower in these cells as compared to normal cells."

Majority of ROS are produced as a by-product of oxidative phosphorylation, high levels of ROS are detected in almost all cancers.
-It is well established that during ER stress, cytosolic calcium released from the ER is taken up by the mitochondrion to stimulate ROS overgeneration and the release of cytochrome c, both of which lead to apoptosis.

Note: Products that may raise ROS can be found using this database, by:
Filtering on the target of ROS, and selecting the Effect Direction of ↑

Targets to raise ROS (to kill cancer cells):
• NADPH oxidases (NOX): NOX enzymes are involved in the production of ROS.
    -Targeting NOX enzymes can increase ROS levels and induce cancer cell death.
    -eNOX2 inhibition leads to a high NADH/NAD⁺ ratio which can lead to increased ROS
• Mitochondrial complex I: Inhibiting can increase ROS production
• P53: Activating p53 can increase ROS levels(by inducing the expression of pro-oxidant genes)
Nrf2 inhibition: regulates the expression of antioxidant genes. Inhibiting Nrf2 can increase ROS levels
• Glutathione (GSH): an antioxidant. Depleting GSH can increase ROS levels
• Catalase: Catalase converts H2O2 into H2O+O. Inhibiting catalase can increase ROS levels
• SOD1: converts superoxide into hydrogen peroxide. Inhibiting SOD1 can increase ROS levels
• PI3K/AKT pathway: regulates cell survival and metabolism. Inhibiting can increase ROS levels
HIF-1α inhibition: regulates genes involved in metabolism and angiogenesis. Inhibiting HIF-1α can increase ROS
• Glycolysis: Inhibiting glycolysis can increase ROS levels • Fatty acid oxidation: Cancer cells often rely on fatty acid oxidation for energy production.
-Inhibiting fatty acid oxidation can increase ROS levels
• ER stress: Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress can increase ROS levels
• Autophagy: process by which cells recycle damaged organelles and proteins.
-Inhibiting autophagy can increase ROS levels and induce cancer cell death.
• KEAP1/Nrf2 pathway: regulates the expression of antioxidant genes.
    -Inhibiting KEAP1 or activating Nrf2 can increase ROS levels and induce cancer cell death.
• DJ-1: regulates the expression of antioxidant genes. Inhibiting DJ-1 can increase ROS levels
• PARK2: regulates the expression of antioxidant genes. Inhibiting PARK2 can increase ROS levels
SIRT1 inhibition:regulates the expression of antioxidant genes. Inhibiting SIRT1 can increase ROS levels
AMPK activation: regulates energy metabolism and can increase ROS levels when activated.
mTOR inhibition: regulates cell growth and metabolism. Inhibiting mTOR can increase ROS levels
HSP90 inhibition: regulates protein folding and can increase ROS levels when inhibited.
• Proteasome: degrades damaged proteins. Inhibiting the proteasome can increase ROS levels
Lipid peroxidation: a process by which lipids are oxidized, leading to the production of ROS.
    -Increasing lipid peroxidation can increase ROS levels
• Ferroptosis: form of cell death that is regulated by iron and lipid peroxidation.
    -Increasing ferroptosis can increase ROS levels
• Mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP): regulates mitochondrial permeability.
    -Opening the mPTP can increase ROS levels
• BCL-2 family proteins: regulate apoptosis and can increase ROS levels when inhibited.
• Caspase-independent cell death: a form of cell death that is regulated by ROS.
    -Increasing caspase-independent cell death can increase ROS levels
• DNA damage response: regulates the repair of DNA damage. Increasing DNA damage can increase ROS
• Epigenetic regulation: process by which gene expression is regulated.
    -Increasing epigenetic regulation can increase ROS levels

-PKM2, but not PKM1, can be inhibited by direct oxidation of cysteine 358 as an adaptive response to increased intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS)

ProOxidant Strategy:(inhibit the Mevalonate Pathway (likely will also inhibit GPx)
-HydroxyCitrate (HCA) found as supplement online and typically used in a dose of about 1.5g/day or more
-Atorvastatin typically 40-80mg/day, -Dipyridamole typically 200mg 2x/day Combined effect research
-Lycopene typically 100mg/day range (note debatable as it mainly lowers NRF2)

Dual Role of Reactive Oxygen Species and their Application in Cancer Therapy
ROS-Inducing Interventions in Cancer — Canonical + Mechanistic Reference
-generated from AI and Cancer database
ROS rating:  +++ strong | ++ moderate | + weak | ± mixed | 0 none
NRF2:        ↓ suppressed | ↑ activated | ± mixed | 0 none
Conditions:  [D] dose  [Fe] metal  [M] metabolic  [O₂] oxygen
             [L] light [F] formulation [T] tumor-type [C] combination

Item ROS NRF2 Condition Mechanism Class Remarks
ROS">Piperlongumine +++ [D][T] ROS-dominant
ROS">Shikonin +++↓/±[D][T]ROS-dominant
ROS">Vitamin K3 (menadione) +++[D]ROS-dominant
ROS">Copper (ionic / nano) +++[Fe][F]ROS-dominant
ROS">Sodium Selenite +++[D]ROS-dominant
ROS">Juglone +++[D]ROS-dominant
ROS">Auranofin +++[D]ROS-dominant
ROS">Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) +++0[L][O₂]ROS-dominant
ROS">Radiotherapy / Radiation +++0[O₂]ROS-dominant
ROS">Doxorubicin +++[D]ROS-dominant
ROS">Cisplatin ++[D][T]ROS-dominant
ROS">Salinomycin ++[D][T]ROS-dominant
ROS">Artemisinin / DHA ++[Fe][T]ROS-dominant
ROS">Sulfasalazine ++[C][T]ROS-dominant
ROS">FMD / fasting ++[M][C][O₂]ROS-dominant
ROS">Vitamin C (pharmacologic) ++[Fe][D]ROS-dominant
ROS">Silver nanoparticles ++±[F][D]ROS-dominant
ROS">Gambogic acid ++[D][T]ROS-dominant
ROS">Parthenolide ++[D][T]ROS-dominant
ROS">Plumbagin ++[D]ROS-dominant
ROS">Allicin ++[D]ROS-dominant
ROS">Ashwagandha (Withaferin A) ++[D][T]ROS-dominant
ROS">Berberine ++[D][M]ROS-dominant
ROS">PEITC ++[D][C]ROS-dominant
ROS">Methionine restriction +[M][C][T]ROS-secondary
ROS">DCA +±[M][T]ROS-secondary
ROS">Capsaicin +±[D][T]ROS-secondary
ROS">Galloflavin +0[D]ROS-secondary
ROS">Piperine +±[D][F]ROS-secondary
ROS">Propyl gallate +[D]ROS-secondary
ROS">Scoulerine +?[D][T]ROS-secondary
ROS">Thymoquinone ±±[D][T]Dual redox
ROS">Emodin ±±[D][T]Dual redox
ROS">Alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) ±[D][M]NRF2-dominant
ROS">Curcumin ±↑/↓[D][F]NRF2-dominant
ROS">EGCG ±↑/↓[D][O₂]NRF2-dominant
ROS">Quercetin ±↑/↓[D][Fe]NRF2-dominant
ROS">Resveratrol ±[D][M]NRF2-dominant
ROS">Sulforaphane ±↑↑[D]NRF2-dominant
ROS">Lycopene 0Antioxidant
ROS">Rosmarinic acid 0Antioxidant
ROS">Citrate 00Neutral


Scientific Papers found: Click to Expand⟱
8236- LE,    Licorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra L.)-Derived Phytochemicals Target Multiple Signaling Pathways to Confer Oncopreventive and Oncotherapeutic Effects
- Review, Var, NA
Bcl-2↓, CDK2↓, PI3K↓, cJun↓, mTOR↓, NF-kB↓, VEGF↓, MMP3↓, toxicity↓, Dose↑, chemoP↑, *antiOx↑, *Inflam↓, Dose↝, *COX2/PTGS2↓, *iNOS↓, *IL6↓, *IL10↓, *PGE2↓, *IκB?, *NRF2↑, *HO-1↑, *lipid-P↓, *ROS↓, *Catalase↑, *GPx↑, *SOD↑, Apoptosis↑, ROS↑, TumCP↓, TumCCA↑, cycE/CCNE↓, cycD1/CCND1↓, p‑GSK‐3β↓, PI3K↓, MKK4↓, MKK7↓, HSP90↓, LC3‑Ⅱ/LC3‑Ⅰ↑, Beclin-1/ATG6↑, p62↓, p‑Akt↓, cl‑Casp9↑, cl‑Casp7↑, cl‑Casp3↑, cl‑PARP↑, BAX↑, Cyt‑c↑, P53↑, STAT3↓, E-cadherin↑, Vim↓, N-cadherin↓, CD31/PECAM-1↓, Hif1a↓, iNOS↓, DNAdam↑, MMP↓, BIM↑, APAF1↑, PCNA↓, toxicity↝, eff↑,

Showing Research Papers: 1 to 1 of 1

* indicates research on normal cells as opposed to diseased cells
Total Research Paper Matches: 1

Pathway results for Effect on Cancer / Diseased Cells:


Redox & Oxidative Stress(tgid=1)

ROS↑, 1,  

Mitochondria & Bioenergetics(tgid=3)

MKK4↓, 1,   MKK7↓, 1,   MMP↓, 1,  

Cell Death(tgid=5)

p‑Akt↓, 1,   APAF1↑, 1,   Apoptosis↑, 1,   BAX↑, 1,   Bcl-2↓, 1,   BIM↑, 1,   cl‑Casp3↑, 1,   cl‑Casp7↑, 1,   cl‑Casp9↑, 1,   Cyt‑c↑, 1,   iNOS↓, 1,  

Transcription & Epigenetics(tgid=7)

cJun↓, 1,  

Protein Folding & ER Stress(tgid=8)

HSP90↓, 1,  

Autophagy & Lysosomes(tgid=9)

Beclin-1/ATG6↑, 1,   LC3‑Ⅱ/LC3‑Ⅰ↑, 1,   p62↓, 1,  

DNA Damage & Repair(tgid=10)

DNAdam↑, 1,   P53↑, 1,   cl‑PARP↑, 1,   PCNA↓, 1,  

Cell Cycle & Senescence(tgid=11)

CDK2↓, 1,   cycD1/CCND1↓, 1,   cycE/CCNE↓, 1,   TumCCA↑, 1,  

Proliferation, Differentiation & Cell State(tgid=12)

p‑GSK‐3β↓, 1,   mTOR↓, 1,   PI3K↓, 2,   STAT3↓, 1,  

Migration(tgid=13)

CD31/PECAM-1↓, 1,   E-cadherin↑, 1,   MMP3↓, 1,   N-cadherin↓, 1,   TumCP↓, 1,   Vim↓, 1,  

Angiogenesis & Vasculature(tgid=14)

Hif1a↓, 1,   VEGF↓, 1,  

Immune & Inflammatory Signaling(tgid=16)

NF-kB↓, 1,  

Drug Metabolism & Resistance(tgid=21)

Dose↑, 1,   Dose↝, 1,   eff↑, 1,  

Functional Outcomes(tgid=23)

chemoP↑, 1,   toxicity↓, 1,   toxicity↝, 1,  
Total Targets: 47

Pathway results for Effect on Normal Cells:


Redox & Oxidative Stress(tgid=1)

antiOx↑, 1,   Catalase↑, 1,   GPx↑, 1,   HO-1↑, 1,   lipid-P↓, 1,   NRF2↑, 1,   ROS↓, 1,   SOD↑, 1,  

Cell Death(tgid=5)

iNOS↓, 1,  

Immune & Inflammatory Signaling(tgid=16)

COX2/PTGS2↓, 1,   IL10↓, 1,   IL6↓, 1,   Inflam↓, 1,   IκB?, 1,   PGE2↓, 1,  

Clinical Biomarkers(tgid=22)

IL6↓, 1,  
Total Targets: 16

Scientific Paper Hit Count for: ROS, Reactive Oxygen Species
Query results interpretion may depend on "conditions" listed in the research papers.
Such Conditions may include : 
  -low or high Dose
  -format for product, such as nano of lipid formations
  -different cell line effects
  -synergies with other products 
  -if effect was for normal or cancerous cells
Filter Conditions: Pro/AntiFlg:%  IllCat:%  CanType:%  Cells:%  prod#:115  Target#:275  State#:%  Dir#:2
wNotes=0 sortOrder:rid,rpid

 

Home Page