Magnetic Fields / TumAuto Cancer Research Results

MF, Magnetic Fields: Click to Expand ⟱

Features: Therapy

Magnetic Fields can be Static, or pulsed. The most common therapy is a pulsed magnetic field in the uT or mT range.
The main pathways affected are:
Calcium Signaling: -influence the activity of voltage-gated calcium channels.
Oxidative Stress and Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) Pathways
Heat Shock Proteins (HSPs) and Cellular Stress Responses
Cell Proliferation and Growth Signaling: MAPK/ERK pathway.
Gene Expression and Epigenetic Modifications: NF-κB
Angiogenesis Pathways: VEGF (improving VEGF for normal cells)
PEMF was found to have a 2-fold increase in drug uptake compared to traditional electrochemotherapy in rat melanoma models

Pathways:
- most reports have ROS production increasing in cancer cells , while decreasing in normal cells.
- ROS↑ related: MMP↓(ΔΨm), ER Stress↑, UPR↑, GRP78↑, Ca+2↑, Cyt‑c↑, Caspases↑, DNA damage↑, cl-PARP↑, HSP↓, Prx,
- Raises AntiOxidant defense in Normal Cells: ROS↓, NRF2↑, SOD↑, GSH↑, Catalase↑,
- lowers Inflammation : NF-kB↓, COX2↓, Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines : NLRP3↓, IL-1β↓, TNF-α↓, IL-6↓, IL-8↓
- inhibit Growth/Metastases : TumMeta↓, TumCG↓, VEGF↓(mostly regulated up in normal cells),
- cause Cell cycle arrest : TumCCA↑,
- inhibits Migration/Invasion : TumCMig↓, TumCI↓, TNF-α↓,
- inhibits glycolysis /Warburg Effect and ATP depletion : HIF-1α↓, PKM2↓, GLUT1↓, LDH↓, HK2↓, PFKs↓, PDKs↓, ECAR↓, OXPHOS↓, GRP78↑, Glucose↓, GlucoseCon↓
- inhibits angiogenesis↓ : VEGF↓, HIF-1α↓, Notch↓, FGF↓, PDGF↓, EGFR↓, Integrins↓,
- Others: PI3K↓, AKT↓, STAT↓, Wnt↓, β-catenin↓, ERK↓, JNK, - SREBP (related to cholesterol).
- Synergies: chemo-sensitization, chemoProtective, cytoProtective, RadioSensitizer, RadioProtective, Others(review target notes), Neuroprotective, Hepatoprotective, CardioProtective,

- Selectivity: Cancer Cells vs Normal Cells

Non-Static Magnetic Fields (AC / Pulsed / Oscillating MF)

Rank	Pathway / Axis	Cancer Cells	Normal Cells	TSF	Primary Effect	Notes / Interpretation
1	Reactive oxygen species (ROS)	↑ ROS (P→R); often sustained (G)	↑ ROS (P); ↔/↓ net ROS (R→G)	P, R, G	Upstream redox perturbation	MF perturbs electron/radical dynamics: normal cells often adapt (ROS setpoint ↓), cancer cells less so
2	NRF2 antioxidant response	↔ / insufficient NRF2 induction (R→G)	↑ NRF2 activation (R→G)	R, G	Adaptive redox defense	Explains mixed ROS direction in normal cells (initial ↑ then adaptive ↓)
3	Glutathione (GSH) homeostasis	↓ GSH (R→G)	↔ or transient ↓ (R) with recovery (G)	R, G	Redox buffering capacity	GSH depletion reflects sustained oxidative load; recovery indicates successful adaptation
4	Superoxide dismutase (SOD) / antioxidant enzymes	↔ or inadequate enzyme upshift (G)	↑ SOD/GPx/CAT capacity (G)	G	Longer-term antioxidant remodeling	Often the “endpoint” readout that correlates with ROS-normalization in normal tissue
5	Mitochondrial ETC / respiration	↓ ETC efficiency; ↑ electron leak (P→R)	↔ mild, reversible ETC perturbation (P→R)	P, R	Bioenergetic destabilization	ETC perturbation is a mechanistic bridge between MF exposure and ROS/ΔΨm changes
6	Mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm / MMP)	↓ ΔΨm (R); may progress (G)	↔ preserved or reversible dip (R)	R, G	Mitochondrial dysfunction thresholding	ΔΨm loss typically follows ROS/ETC disruption rather than preceding it
7	Ca²⁺ signaling (VGCC / ER–mitochondria Ca²⁺ flux)	↑ dysregulated Ca²⁺ influx/transfer (P→R); overload may persist (G)	↑ transient Ca²⁺ signaling (P); homeostasis restored (R→G)	P, R, G	Stress signal amplification	Ca²⁺ dysregulation links ROS/ETC perturbation to ER stress and mitochondrial dysfunction (amplifies ΔΨm loss and UPR commitment)
8	Mitochondrial permeability transition pore (MPTP)	↑ MPTP opening propensity (R); sustained opening possible (G)	↔ transient or closed (R→G)	P, R, G	Commitment point for mitochondrial failure	MPTP opening integrates ROS, Ca²⁺ overload, and ΔΨm loss; acts as a threshold event converting reversible stress into irreversible mitochondrial dysfunction
9	ER stress / UPR	↑ ER stress (R); CHOP-commitment possible (G)	↑ adaptive UPR (R); resolves (G)	R, G	Proteostasis stress	Often downstream of ROS + Ca²⁺ handling perturbations
10	DNA damage (oxidative)	↑ damage markers (R→G)	↔ or repaired (G)	R, G	Checkpoint pressure	Generally secondary to ROS; interpret as stress consequence not “direct genotoxicity”
11	LDH / glycolytic flux	↓ glycolytic performance (R→G)	↔ flexible substrate switching (R→G)	R, G	Metabolic vulnerability	Redox imbalance can destabilize high-rate glycolysis in cancer-biased contexts
12	Thioredoxin system (Trx / TrxR)	↓ functional reserve / overload (R→G)	↔ preserved capacity (G)	R, G	Parallel antioxidant system stress	Useful when GSH-only does not explain redox phenotype

Time-Scale Flag: TSF = P / R / G
  P: 0–30 min (physical / electron / radical effects)
  R: 30 min–3 hr (redox signaling & stress response)
  G: >3 hr (gene-regulatory adaptation)

MPTP: opening represents a mitochondrial commitment event integrating ROS and Ca²⁺ stress; sustained opening indicates irreversible bioenergetic failure.

TumAuto, Tumor autophagy: Click to Expand ⟱

Source: HalifaxProj(activate)

Type:

Autophagy genes, including Atg3, Atg5, Atg6, Atg7, Atg10, Atg12, and Atg17.
Tumor autophagy refers to the process by which cancer cells degrade and recycle cellular components through autophagy, a cellular mechanism that helps maintain homeostasis and respond to stress. Autophagy can have dual roles in cancer, acting as both a tumor suppressor and a promoter, depending on the context.
Authophagy is the process used by cancer cells to “self-eat” to survive. Authophagy can be both good and bad. If authophagy is prolonged this will become a lethal process to cancer. On the other hand, for a short while (e.g. during chemotheraphy, radiotheraphy, etc.) authophagy is used by cancer cells to survive.
For example, Chloroquine is a blocker of autophagy and has been used in a lab setting to dramatically enhance tumor response to radiotherapy, chemotherapy.

Scientific Papers found: Click to Expand⟱

400-

AgNPs,

MF,

Polyvinyl Alcohol Capped Silver Nanostructures for Fortified Apoptotic Potential Against Human Laryngeal Carcinoma Cells Hep-2 Using Extremely-Low Frequency Electromagnetic Field

in-vitro,

Laryn,

HEp2

50mT/30mins

3.29 0.4 mol/mL

6x improvement when LEMF added (50mT/15mins)

TumCP↓, Casp3↑, P53↑, Beclin-1↑, TumAuto↑, GSR↑, ROS↑, MDA↑, ROS↑, SIRT1↑, Ca+2↑, Endon↑, DNAdam↑, Apoptosis↑, NF-kB↓,

537-

MF,

immuno,

Integrating electromagnetic cancer stress with immunotherapy: a therapeutic paradigm

Review,

Var,

Apoptosis↑, ROS↑, TumAuto↑, Ca+2↑, ATP↓, eff↑, eff↑,

3457-

MF,

Cellular stress response to extremely low‐frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF‐EMF): An explanation for controversial effects of ELF‐EMF on apoptosis

Review,

Var,

Apoptosis↑, H2O2↑, ROS↑, eff↑, eff↑, Ca+2↑, MAPK↑, *Catalase↑, *SOD1↑, *GPx1↑, *GPx4↑, *NRF2↑, TumAuto↑, ER Stress↑, HSPs↑, SIRT3↑, ChemoSen↑, UPR↑, other↑, PI3K↓, JNK↑, p38↑, eff↓, *toxicity?,

3464-

MF,

Progressive Study on the Non-thermal Effects of Magnetic Field Therapy in Oncology

Review,

Var,

AntiTum↑, TumCG↓, TumCCA↑, Apoptosis↑, TumAuto↑, Diff↑, angioG↓, TumMeta↓, EPR↑, ChemoSen↑, ROS↑, DNAdam↑, P53↑, Akt↓, MAPK↑, Casp9↑, VEGFR2↓, P-gp↓,

509-

MF,

Is extremely low frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields applicable to gliomas? A literature review of the underlying mechanisms and application of extremely low frequency pulsed electromagnetic fields

Review,

NA,

Ca+2↑, TumAuto↑, Apoptosis↑, angioG↓, ROS↑,

227-

MFrot,

MF,

Low Frequency Magnetic Fields Induce Autophagy-associated Cell Death in Lung Cancer through miR-486-mediated Inhibition of Akt/mTOR Signaling Pathway

in-vivo,

Lung,

A549

 0.4T, 7.5 Hz, 4 h/day

 mouse

in-vitro,

Lung,

A549

TumCG↓, miR-486↑, BCAP↓, Apoptosis↑, ROS↑, TumAuto↑, LC3II↑, ATG5↑, Beclin-1↑, p62↑, TumCP↓,

Showing Research Papers: 1 to 6 of 6

* indicates research on normal cells as opposed to diseased cells
Total Research Paper Matches: 6

Pathway results for Effect on Cancer / Diseased Cells:

Functional Outcomes ⓘ

AntiTum↑, 1,
Total Targets: 44

Pathway results for Effect on Normal Cells:

Redox & Oxidative Stress ⓘ

Catalase↑, 1, GPx1↑, 1, GPx4↑, 1, NRF2↑, 1, SOD1↑, 1,

Functional Outcomes ⓘ

toxicity?, 1,
Total Targets: 6

Scientific Paper Hit Count for: TumAuto, Tumor autophagy

6 Magnetic Fields
1 Silver-NanoParticles
1 immunotherapy
1 Magnetic Field Rotating

Query results interpretion may depend on "conditions" listed in the research papers.
Such Conditions may include : 
  -low or high Dose
  -format for product, such as nano of lipid formations
  -different cell line effects
  -synergies with other products 
  -if effect was for normal or cancerous cells

Filter Conditions: Pro/AntiFlg:%  IllCat:%  CanType:%  Cells:%  prod#:172  Target#:321  State#:%  Dir#:2
  wNotes=0  sortOrder:rid,rpid

Magnetic Fields / TumAuto Cancer Research Results

Pathway results for Effect on Cancer / Diseased Cells:

Redox & Oxidative Stress ⓘ

Mitochondria & Bioenergetics ⓘ

Core Metabolism/Glycolysis ⓘ

Cell Death ⓘ

Transcription & Epigenetics ⓘ

Protein Folding & ER Stress ⓘ

Autophagy & Lysosomes ⓘ

DNA Damage & Repair ⓘ

Cell Cycle & Senescence ⓘ

Proliferation, Differentiation & Cell State ⓘ

Migration ⓘ

Angiogenesis & Vasculature ⓘ

Barriers & Transport ⓘ

Immune & Inflammatory Signaling ⓘ

Drug Metabolism & Resistance ⓘ

Functional Outcomes ⓘ

Pathway results for Effect on Normal Cells:

Redox & Oxidative Stress ⓘ

Functional Outcomes ⓘ

Home Page