Magnetic Fields / ERK Cancer Research Results

MF, Magnetic Fields: Click to Expand ⟱
Features: Therapy
Magnetic Fields can be Static, or pulsed. The most common therapy is a pulsed magnetic field in the uT or mT range.
The main pathways affected are:
Calcium Signaling: -influence the activity of voltage-gated calcium channels.
Oxidative Stress and Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) Pathways
Heat Shock Proteins (HSPs) and Cellular Stress Responses
Cell Proliferation and Growth Signaling: MAPK/ERK pathway.
Gene Expression and Epigenetic Modifications: NF-κB
Angiogenesis Pathways: VEGF (improving VEGF for normal cells)
PEMF was found to have a 2-fold increase in drug uptake compared to traditional electrochemotherapy in rat melanoma models

Pathways:
- most reports have ROS production increasing in cancer cells , while decreasing in normal cells.
- ROS↑ related: MMP↓(ΔΨm), ER Stress↑, UPR↑, GRP78↑, Ca+2↑, Cyt‑c↑, Caspases↑, DNA damage↑, cl-PARP↑, HSP↓, Prx,
- Raises AntiOxidant defense in Normal Cells: ROS↓, NRF2↑, SOD↑, GSH↑, Catalase↑,
- lowers Inflammation : NF-kB↓, COX2↓, Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines : NLRP3↓, IL-1β↓, TNF-α↓, IL-6↓, IL-8↓
- inhibit Growth/Metastases : TumMeta↓, TumCG↓, VEGF↓(mostly regulated up in normal cells),
- cause Cell cycle arrest : TumCCA↑,
- inhibits Migration/Invasion : TumCMig↓, TumCI↓, TNF-α↓,
- inhibits glycolysis /Warburg Effect and ATP depletion : HIF-1α↓, PKM2↓, GLUT1↓, LDH↓, HK2↓, PFKs↓, PDKs↓, ECAR↓, OXPHOS↓, GRP78↑, Glucose↓, GlucoseCon↓
- inhibits angiogenesis↓ : VEGF↓, HIF-1α↓, Notch↓, FGF↓, PDGF↓, EGFR↓, Integrins↓,
- Others: PI3K↓, AKT↓, STAT↓, Wnt↓, β-catenin↓, ERK↓, JNK, - SREBP (related to cholesterol).
- Synergies: chemo-sensitization, chemoProtective, cytoProtective, RadioSensitizer, RadioProtective, Others(review target notes), Neuroprotective, Hepatoprotective, CardioProtective,

- Selectivity: Cancer Cells vs Normal Cells

Non-Static Magnetic Fields (AC / Pulsed / Oscillating MF)
Rank Pathway / Axis Cancer Cells Normal Cells TSF Primary Effect Notes / Interpretation
1 Reactive oxygen species (ROS) ↑ ROS (P→R); often sustained (G) ↑ ROS (P); ↔/↓ net ROS (R→G) P, R, G Upstream redox perturbation MF perturbs electron/radical dynamics: normal cells often adapt (ROS setpoint ↓), cancer cells less so
2 NRF2 antioxidant response ↔ / insufficient NRF2 induction (R→G) ↑ NRF2 activation (R→G) R, G Adaptive redox defense Explains mixed ROS direction in normal cells (initial ↑ then adaptive ↓)
3 Glutathione (GSH) homeostasis ↓ GSH (R→G) ↔ or transient ↓ (R) with recovery (G) R, G Redox buffering capacity GSH depletion reflects sustained oxidative load; recovery indicates successful adaptation
4 Superoxide dismutase (SOD) / antioxidant enzymes ↔ or inadequate enzyme upshift (G) ↑ SOD/GPx/CAT capacity (G) G Longer-term antioxidant remodeling Often the “endpoint” readout that correlates with ROS-normalization in normal tissue
5 Mitochondrial ETC / respiration ↓ ETC efficiency; ↑ electron leak (P→R) ↔ mild, reversible ETC perturbation (P→R) P, R Bioenergetic destabilization ETC perturbation is a mechanistic bridge between MF exposure and ROS/ΔΨm changes
6 Mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm / MMP) ↓ ΔΨm (R); may progress (G) ↔ preserved or reversible dip (R) R, G Mitochondrial dysfunction thresholding ΔΨm loss typically follows ROS/ETC disruption rather than preceding it
7 Ca²⁺ signaling (VGCC / ER–mitochondria Ca²⁺ flux) ↑ dysregulated Ca²⁺ influx/transfer (P→R); overload may persist (G) ↑ transient Ca²⁺ signaling (P); homeostasis restored (R→G) P, R, G Stress signal amplification Ca²⁺ dysregulation links ROS/ETC perturbation to ER stress and mitochondrial dysfunction (amplifies ΔΨm loss and UPR commitment)
8 Mitochondrial permeability transition pore (MPTP) ↑ MPTP opening propensity (R); sustained opening possible (G) ↔ transient or closed (R→G) P, R, G Commitment point for mitochondrial failure MPTP opening integrates ROS, Ca²⁺ overload, and ΔΨm loss; acts as a threshold event converting reversible stress into irreversible mitochondrial dysfunction
9 ER stress / UPR ↑ ER stress (R); CHOP-commitment possible (G) ↑ adaptive UPR (R); resolves (G) R, G Proteostasis stress Often downstream of ROS + Ca²⁺ handling perturbations
10 DNA damage (oxidative) ↑ damage markers (R→G) ↔ or repaired (G) R, G Checkpoint pressure Generally secondary to ROS; interpret as stress consequence not “direct genotoxicity”
11 LDH / glycolytic flux ↓ glycolytic performance (R→G) ↔ flexible substrate switching (R→G) R, G Metabolic vulnerability Redox imbalance can destabilize high-rate glycolysis in cancer-biased contexts
12 Thioredoxin system (Trx / TrxR) ↓ functional reserve / overload (R→G) ↔ preserved capacity (G) R, G Parallel antioxidant system stress Useful when GSH-only does not explain redox phenotype 
Time-Scale Flag: TSF = P / R / G
  P: 0–30 min (physical / electron / radical effects)
  R: 30 min–3 hr (redox signaling & stress response)
  G: >3 hr (gene-regulatory adaptation)
MPTP: opening represents a mitochondrial commitment event integrating ROS and Ca²⁺ stress; sustained opening indicates irreversible bioenergetic failure.
ERK, ERK signaling: Click to Expand ⟱
Source:
Type:
MAPK3 (ERK1)
ERK proteins are kinases that activate other proteins by adding a phosphate group. An overactivation of these proteins causes the cell cycle to stop.
The extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling pathway is a crucial component of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling cascade, which plays a significant role in regulating various cellular processes, including proliferation, differentiation, and survival. high levels of phosphorylated ERK (p-ERK) in tumor samples may indicate active ERK signaling and could correlate with aggressive tumor behavior

EEk singaling is frequently activated and is often associated with aggressive tumor behavior, treatment resistance, and poor outcomes.
Scientific Papers found: Click to Expand⟱
527- MF,    Effects of Fifty-Hertz Electromagnetic Fields on Granulocytic Differentiation of ATRA-Treated Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia NB4 Cells
- in-vitro, AML, APL NB4
ROS↑, other↑, p‑ERK↑, TumCP↓,
2241- MF,    Pulsed electromagnetic therapy in cancer treatment: Progress and outlook
- Review, Var, NA
other↝, p‑ERK↝, P53↝, Cyt‑c↝, OXPHOS↑, Apoptosis↑, ROS↑,
2243- MF,    Pulsed electromagnetic fields increase osteogenetic commitment of MSCs via the mTOR pathway in TNF-α mediated inflammatory conditions: an in-vitro study
- in-vitro, Nor, NA
*eff↑, *mTOR↑, *Akt↑, *PKA↑, *MAPK↑, *ERK↑, *BMP2↑, *Diff↑, *PKCδ↓, *VEGF↑, *IL10↑,
486- MF,    mTOR Activation by PI3K/Akt and ERK Signaling in Short ELF-EMF Exposed Human Keratinocytes
- in-vitro, Nor, HaCaT
*mTOR↑, *PI3K↑, *Akt↑, *p‑ERK↑, *other↑, *p‑JNK↑, *p‑P70S6K↑,
194- MF,    Electromagnetic Field as a Treatment for Cerebral Ischemic Stroke
- Review, Stroke, NA
*BAD↓, *BAX↓, *Casp3↓, *Bcl-xL↑, *p‑Akt↑, *MMP9↓, *p‑ERK↑, *HIF-1↓, *ROS↓, *VEGF↑, *Ca+2↓, *SOD↑, *IL2↑, *p38↑, *HSP70/HSPA5↑, *Apoptosis↓, *ROS↓, *NO↓,
513- MF,    Exposure to a specific time-varying electromagnetic field inhibits cell proliferation via cAMP and ERK signaling in cancer cells
- in-vitro, BC, MDA-MB-231 - in-vitro, BC, MDA-MB-468 - in-vitro, BC, MCF-7 - in-vivo, Pca, HeLa
TumCG↓, p‑ERK↑, cAMP⇅,
4146- MF,    Pulsed electromagnetic field enhances brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression through L-type voltage-gated calcium channel- and Erk-dependent signaling pathways in neonatal rat dorsal root ganglion neurons
- in-vivo, AD, NA
*BDNF↑, *ERK↑,
4147- MF,    PEMFs Restore Mitochondrial and CREB/BDNF Signaling in Oxidatively Stressed PC12 Cells Targeting Neurodegeneration
- in-vitro, AD, PC12
*ROS↓, *Catalase↑, *MMP↑, *Casp3↓, *p‑ERK↓, *cAMP↑, *p‑CREB↑, *BDNF↑, *neuroP↑,
204- MFrot,  MF,    Rotating magnetic field improved cognitive and memory impairments in a sporadic ad model of mice by regulating microglial polarization
- in-vivo, AD, NA
*NF-kB↓, *MAPK↓, *TLR4↓, *memory↑, *cognitive↑, *TGF-β1↑, *ARG↑, *IL4↑, *IL10↑, *IL6↓, *IL1↓, *TNF-α↓, *iNOS↓, *ROS↓, *NO↓, *MyD88↓, *p‑IKKα↓, *p‑IκB↓, *p‑p65↓, *p‑JNK↓, *p‑p38↓, *ERK↓, *neuroP↑, *Aβ↓,
189- MFrot,  MF,    Cancer treatment by magneto-mechanical effect of particles, a review
- Review, Var, NA
CellMemb↑, lysoMP↑, ERK↑, Apoptosis↑,

Showing Research Papers: 1 to 10 of 10

* indicates research on normal cells as opposed to diseased cells
Total Research Paper Matches: 10

Pathway results for Effect on Cancer / Diseased Cells:


Redox & Oxidative Stress ⓘ

OXPHOS↑, 1,   ROS↑, 2,  

Core Metabolism/Glycolysis ⓘ

cAMP⇅, 1,  

Cell Death ⓘ

Apoptosis↑, 2,   Cyt‑c↝, 1,   lysoMP↑, 1,  

Transcription & Epigenetics ⓘ

other↑, 1,   other↝, 1,  

DNA Damage & Repair ⓘ

P53↝, 1,  

Proliferation, Differentiation & Cell State ⓘ

ERK↑, 1,   p‑ERK↑, 2,   p‑ERK↝, 1,   TumCG↓, 1,  

Migration ⓘ

TumCP↓, 1,  

Barriers & Transport ⓘ

CellMemb↑, 1,  
Total Targets: 15

Pathway results for Effect on Normal Cells:


Redox & Oxidative Stress ⓘ

Catalase↑, 1,   ROS↓, 4,   SOD↑, 1,  

Mitochondria & Bioenergetics ⓘ

MMP↑, 1,  

Core Metabolism/Glycolysis ⓘ

cAMP↑, 1,   p‑CREB↑, 1,  

Cell Death ⓘ

Akt↑, 2,   p‑Akt↑, 1,   Apoptosis↓, 1,   BAD↓, 1,   BAX↓, 1,   Bcl-xL↑, 1,   BMP2↑, 1,   Casp3↓, 2,   iNOS↓, 1,   p‑JNK↓, 1,   p‑JNK↑, 1,   MAPK↓, 1,   MAPK↑, 1,   p38↑, 1,   p‑p38↓, 1,  

Transcription & Epigenetics ⓘ

other↑, 1,  

Protein Folding & ER Stress ⓘ

HSP70/HSPA5↑, 1,  

Proliferation, Differentiation & Cell State ⓘ

Diff↑, 1,   ERK↓, 1,   ERK↑, 2,   p‑ERK↓, 1,   p‑ERK↑, 2,   mTOR↑, 2,   p‑P70S6K↑, 1,   PI3K↑, 1,  

Migration ⓘ

ARG↑, 1,   Ca+2↓, 1,   MMP9↓, 1,   PKA↑, 1,   PKCδ↓, 1,   TGF-β1↑, 1,  

Angiogenesis & Vasculature ⓘ

HIF-1↓, 1,   NO↓, 2,   VEGF↑, 2,  

Immune & Inflammatory Signaling ⓘ

p‑IKKα↓, 1,   IL1↓, 1,   IL10↑, 2,   IL2↑, 1,   IL4↑, 1,   IL6↓, 1,   p‑IκB↓, 1,   MyD88↓, 1,   NF-kB↓, 1,   p‑p65↓, 1,   TLR4↓, 1,   TNF-α↓, 1,  

Synaptic & Neurotransmission ⓘ

BDNF↑, 2,  

Protein Aggregation ⓘ

Aβ↓, 1,  

Drug Metabolism & Resistance ⓘ

eff↑, 1,  

Clinical Biomarkers ⓘ

IL6↓, 1,  

Functional Outcomes ⓘ

cognitive↑, 1,   memory↑, 1,   neuroP↑, 2,  
Total Targets: 59

Scientific Paper Hit Count for: ERK, ERK signaling
10 Magnetic Fields
2 Magnetic Field Rotating
Query results interpretion may depend on "conditions" listed in the research papers.
Such Conditions may include : 
  -low or high Dose
  -format for product, such as nano of lipid formations
  -different cell line effects
  -synergies with other products 
  -if effect was for normal or cancerous cells

Filter Conditions: Pro/AntiFlg:%  IllCat:%  CanType:%  Cells:%  prod#:172  Target#:105  State#:%  Dir#:%
  wNotes=0  sortOrder:rid,rpid

 

Home Page