Gossypol/AT-101 / ROS Cancer Research Results

Gos, Gossypol/AT-101: Click to Expand ⟱
Features:
Gossypol is a natural compound found in cottonseed, a byproduct of the cotton industry. It has been studied for its potential anti-cancer properties. Research has shown that gossypol can inhibit the growth of various types of cancer cells, including breast, prostate, lung, and colon cancer.

Gossypol's anti-cancer effects are thought to be due to its ability to:

-Inhibit the activity of certain enzymes involved in cancer cell growth and survival
-Induce apoptosis (cell death) in cancer cells
-Inhibit the formation of new blood vessels that feed cancer cells (anti-angiogenesis)
-Modulate the immune system to attack cancer cells

Some studies have also suggested that gossypol may have synergistic effects when combined with other anti-cancer agents, such as chemotherapy and radiation therapy.

Gossypol — a naturally occurring polyphenolic binaphthyl dialdehyde concentrated in the pigment glands of cotton plants (Gossypium spp.), particularly cottonseed. It is a plant-derived small-molecule bioactive compound and toxicant with two atropisomeric enantiomers. The R-(−) enantiomer, commonly termed (−)-gossypol or AT-101 when developed as gossypol acetic acid, has substantially greater anticancer activity than the S-(+) enantiomer and has been clinically investigated as an orally administered BH3-mimetic anticancer agent. Gossypol itself is not an approved anticancer drug; R-(−)-gossypol has FDA orphan-drug designation for chronic lymphocytic leukemia but has not received FDA approval for that indication. Cottonseed or crude cotton-derived material should not be considered equivalent to pharmaceutical AT-101 because gossypol content, stereochemistry, binding state, exposure, and toxicity are poorly controlled.

Primary mechanisms (ranked):

  1. BH3-mimetic inhibition of anti-apoptotic BCL-2-family proteins, particularly BCL-2, BCL-XL and MCL-1, releasing pro-apoptotic BAX/BAK signaling and lowering the mitochondrial apoptotic threshold.
  2. Mitochondrial dysfunction and intrinsic apoptosis, including mitochondrial outer-membrane permeabilization, loss of membrane potential, impaired respiration and ATP production, cytochrome-c-associated caspase activation, and apoptotic cell death.
  3. Disruption of BCL-2/Beclin-1 and BCL-XL/Beclin-1 complexes, permitting Beclin-1-dependent autophagy; the contribution of autophagy to tumor-cell death versus survival is context-dependent.
  4. Inhibition of lactate dehydrogenase and other dehydrogenases, producing reduced glycolytic lactate formation and metabolic stress; this is pharmacologically established but appears less central to modern clinical development than BCL-2-family antagonism.
  5. Chemosensitization and radiosensitization through lowering of the apoptotic threshold, particularly in tumors dependent on BCL-2/BCL-XL/MCL-1 survival signaling.
  6. ROS and oxidative-stress modulation (secondary, context-dependent); increased ROS contributes to cytotoxicity in some tumor models, whereas other models demonstrate ROS-independent mitochondrial apoptosis.
  7. Suppression of tumor growth, angiogenic signaling and selected invasion-associated pathways in preclinical models, including reductions in VEGF-related signaling in some systems; these are secondary and tumor-model-dependent effects.

Bioavailability / PK relevance: Gossypol and AT-101 have been administered orally in human cancer trials. Absorption is relatively slow and highly variable between individuals. In one clinical PK study using AT-101 40 mg twice daily, mean plasma Cmax was approximately 0.66 µg/mL, equivalent to about 1.3 µM, with individual values approximately 0.6–1.8 µM and a mean measured elimination half-life near 3.3 hours during the sampling interval. Other trials using 10–20 mg doses reported peaks of roughly 300–700 ng/mL around 1.5–2.5 hours. Gossypol is strongly protein-reactive/protein-bound and undergoes extensive tissue distribution, making total plasma concentration an imperfect surrogate for pharmacologically available intracellular exposure. Human pharmacokinetic behavior is heterogeneous and no validated therapeutic plasma concentration has been established.

In-vitro vs systemic exposure relevance: Clinically achieved total plasma concentrations can reach the low-micromolar range and therefore overlap with some experiments demonstrating BCL-2-family inhibition, mitochondrial disruption and radiosensitization. However, many preclinical experiments use approximately 5–30 µM gossypol, which exceeds typical total human plasma exposure, sometimes substantially. Strong protein binding further reduces free-drug exposure. Mechanistic findings requiring high-micromolar concentrations should therefore be classified as high-concentration preclinical effects rather than assumed clinically achievable mechanisms.

Clinical evidence status: Human Phase I and Phase II evidence exists for racemic gossypol and particularly AT-101, including monotherapy and combinations with docetaxel, cisplatin/etoposide, paclitaxel/carboplatin, radiation/temozolomide, and lenalidomide/dexamethasone. Several randomized studies failed to demonstrate significant survival improvement, and multiple development programs were stopped for lack of prespecified efficacy. More recent small studies have shown potentially useful activity in selected settings, including a 10-patient relapsed/refractory multiple-myeloma study and trials in glioblastoma, but these remain exploratory. Overall classification: clinical investigational; Phase I/II human evidence; no established standard-of-care indication and no FDA anticancer approval. Dose-limiting and clinically relevant toxicities have included gastrointestinal toxicity, hepatic enzyme elevation, cytopenias in combination regimens, electrolyte disturbances including hypokalemia, and reproductive toxicity with suppression of spermatogenesis.

Gossypol Cancer-Relevant Mechanisms

Rank Pathway / Axis Cancer Cells Normal Cells Primary Effect Notes / Interpretation
1 BCL-2 / BCL-XL / MCL-1 survival signaling ↓ (context-dependent) BH3-mimetic displacement of pro-apoptotic BCL-2-family partners Principal anticancer mechanism of R-(−)-gossypol / AT-101. Tumors dependent on anti-apoptotic BCL-2-family proteins may be preferentially susceptible.
2 Mitochondrial apoptosis ↑ (dose-dependent) Mitochondrial permeabilization, membrane-potential loss and caspase-associated apoptosis Closely linked to BCL-2-family inhibition. Therapeutic selectivity is incomplete and depends on cellular BCL-2-family dependence and exposure.
3 Mitochondrial bioenergetics ↓ (dose-dependent) Reduced mitochondrial respiration and ATP production Demonstrated experimentally with AT-101 and may augment apoptotic stress. High exposure can also impair normal-cell mitochondrial function.
4 BCL-2 / Beclin-1 autophagy control ↓ BCL-2–Beclin-1 binding
↑ autophagy
↔ / ↑ (context-dependent) Release of Beclin-1 and induction of autophagic signaling Particularly described in apoptosis-resistant, BCL-2-high prostate cancer. Autophagy may contribute to cell death or cellular adaptation depending on model.
5 LDH-dependent glycolysis and lactate production ↓ (dose-dependent) Dehydrogenase inhibition and reduced lactate-forming glycolytic flux Gossypol is a recognized LDH inhibitor, but this mechanism has received less clinical validation than BH3-mimetic activity.
6 Chemosensitization ↔ / ↑ toxicity (context-dependent) Lowers apoptotic threshold to cytotoxic agents Synergy or enhanced cytotoxicity has been demonstrated with cisplatin, taxanes, etoposide, bortezomib and other agents preclinically. Human combination trials have produced mixed efficacy.
7 Radiosensitization ↔ / ↑ toxicity (context-dependent) Enhances radiation-associated tumor-cell killing Low-micromolar AT-101 concentrations can radiosensitize tumor models, and clinically measured plasma concentrations have overlapped this range in some studies.
8 Oxidative and mitochondrial ROS stress ↑ (model-dependent) ↑ (high concentration only) Oxidative stress contributing to apoptosis in selected tumor models Secondary mechanism. ROS induction is not universal; ROS-independent mitochondrial apoptosis has also been demonstrated.
9 Angiogenic signaling ↓ (model-dependent) ↓ (context-dependent) Reduced angiogenic signaling and tumor vascular support VEGF and related angiogenic markers decrease in selected preclinical models. Evidence is substantially weaker than for BCL-2-family antagonism.
10 Clinical Translation Constraint ↓ therapeutic margin Exposure variability, protein binding, toxicity and limited demonstrated efficacy Oral absorption is variable; many in-vitro studies use concentrations above typical systemic exposure. Reproductive toxicity, gastrointestinal toxicity, hepatic effects, electrolyte abnormalities and hematologic toxicity constrain dosing. Multiple randomized Phase II programs failed to improve major clinical outcomes.


ROS, Reactive Oxygen Species: Click to Expand ⟱
Source: HalifaxProj (inhibit)
Type:
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are highly reactive molecules that contain oxygen and can lead to oxidative stress in cells. They play a dual role in cancer biology, acting as both promoters and suppressors of cancer.
ROS can cause oxidative damage to DNA, leading to mutations that may contribute to cancer initiation and progression. So normally you want to inhibit ROS to prevent cell mutations.
However excessive ROS can induce apoptosis (programmed cell death) in cancer cells, potentially limiting tumor growth. Chemotherapy typically raises ROS.
-mitochondria is the main source of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (and the ETC is heavily related)
ROS Homeostasis in Cancer Cells and Its Potential as a Therapeutic Target

"Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are two electron reduction products of oxygen, including superoxide anion, hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl radical, lipid peroxides, protein peroxides and peroxides formed in nucleic acids 1. They are maintained in a dynamic balance by a series of reduction-oxidation (redox) reactions in biological systems and act as signaling molecules to drive cellular regulatory pathways."
"During different stages of cancer formation, abnormal ROS levels play paradoxical roles in cell growth and death 8. A physiological concentration of ROS that maintained in equilibrium is necessary for normal cell survival. Ectopic ROS accumulation promotes cell proliferation and consequently induces malignant transformation of normal cells by initiating pathological conversion of physiological signaling networks. Excessive ROS levels lead to cell death by damaging cellular components, including proteins, lipid bilayers, and chromosomes. Therefore, both scavenging abnormally elevated ROS to prevent early neoplasia and facilitating ROS production to specifically kill cancer cells are promising anticancer therapeutic strategies, in spite of their contradictoriness and complexity."
"ROS are the collection of derivatives of molecular oxygen that occur in biology, which can be categorized into two types, free radicals and non-radical species. The non-radical species are hydrogen peroxide (H 2O 2 ), organic hydroperoxides (ROOH), singlet molecular oxygen ( 1 O 2 ), electronically excited carbonyl, ozone (O3 ), hypochlorous acid (HOCl, and hypobromous acid HOBr). Free radical species are super-oxide anion radical (O 2•−), hydroxyl radical (•OH), peroxyl radical (ROO•) and alkoxyl radical (RO•) [130]. Any imbalance of ROS can lead to adverse effects. H2 O 2 and O 2 •− are the main redox signalling agents. The cellular concentration of H2 O 2 is about 10−8 M, which is almost a thousand times more than that of O2 •−".
"Radicals are molecules with an odd number of electrons in the outer shell [393,394]. A pair of radicals can be formed by breaking a chemical bond or electron transfer between two molecules."

Recent investigations have documented that polyphenols with good antioxidant activity may exhibit pro-oxidant activity in the presence of copper ions, which can induce apoptosis in various cancer cell lines but not in normal cells. "We have shown that such cell growth inhibition by polyphenols in cancer cells is reversed by copper-specific sequestering agent neocuproine to a significant extent whereas iron and zinc chelators are relatively ineffective, thus confirming the role of endogenous copper in the cytotoxic action of polyphenols against cancer cells. Therefore, this mechanism of mobilization of endogenous copper." > Ions could be one of the important mechanisms for the cytotoxic action of plant polyphenols against cancer cells and is possibly a common mechanism for all plant polyphenols. In fact, similar results obtained with four different polyphenolic compounds in this study, namely apigenin, luteolin, EGCG, and resveratrol, strengthen this idea.
Interestingly, the normal breast epithelial MCF10A cells have earlier been shown to possess no detectable copper as opposed to breast cancer cells [24], which may explain their resistance to polyphenols apigenin- and luteolin-induced growth inhibition as observed here (Fig. 1). We have earlier proposed [25] that this preferential cytotoxicity of plant polyphenols toward cancer cells is explained by the observation made several years earlier, which showed that copper levels in cancer cells are significantly elevated in various malignancies. Thus, because of higher intracellular copper levels in cancer cells, it may be predicted that the cytotoxic concentrations of polyphenols required would be lower in these cells as compared to normal cells."

Majority of ROS are produced as a by-product of oxidative phosphorylation, high levels of ROS are detected in almost all cancers.
-It is well established that during ER stress, cytosolic calcium released from the ER is taken up by the mitochondrion to stimulate ROS overgeneration and the release of cytochrome c, both of which lead to apoptosis.

Note: Products that may raise ROS can be found using this database, by:
Filtering on the target of ROS, and selecting the Effect Direction of ↑

Targets to raise ROS (to kill cancer cells):
• NADPH oxidases (NOX): NOX enzymes are involved in the production of ROS.
    -Targeting NOX enzymes can increase ROS levels and induce cancer cell death.
    -eNOX2 inhibition leads to a high NADH/NAD⁺ ratio which can lead to increased ROS
• Mitochondrial complex I: Inhibiting can increase ROS production
• P53: Activating p53 can increase ROS levels(by inducing the expression of pro-oxidant genes)
Nrf2 inhibition: regulates the expression of antioxidant genes. Inhibiting Nrf2 can increase ROS levels
• Glutathione (GSH): an antioxidant. Depleting GSH can increase ROS levels
• Catalase: Catalase converts H2O2 into H2O+O. Inhibiting catalase can increase ROS levels
• SOD1: converts superoxide into hydrogen peroxide. Inhibiting SOD1 can increase ROS levels
• PI3K/AKT pathway: regulates cell survival and metabolism. Inhibiting can increase ROS levels
HIF-1α inhibition: regulates genes involved in metabolism and angiogenesis. Inhibiting HIF-1α can increase ROS
• Glycolysis: Inhibiting glycolysis can increase ROS levels • Fatty acid oxidation: Cancer cells often rely on fatty acid oxidation for energy production.
-Inhibiting fatty acid oxidation can increase ROS levels
• ER stress: Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress can increase ROS levels
• Autophagy: process by which cells recycle damaged organelles and proteins.
-Inhibiting autophagy can increase ROS levels and induce cancer cell death.
• KEAP1/Nrf2 pathway: regulates the expression of antioxidant genes.
    -Inhibiting KEAP1 or activating Nrf2 can increase ROS levels and induce cancer cell death.
• DJ-1: regulates the expression of antioxidant genes. Inhibiting DJ-1 can increase ROS levels
• PARK2: regulates the expression of antioxidant genes. Inhibiting PARK2 can increase ROS levels
SIRT1 inhibition:regulates the expression of antioxidant genes. Inhibiting SIRT1 can increase ROS levels
AMPK activation: regulates energy metabolism and can increase ROS levels when activated.
mTOR inhibition: regulates cell growth and metabolism. Inhibiting mTOR can increase ROS levels
HSP90 inhibition: regulates protein folding and can increase ROS levels when inhibited.
• Proteasome: degrades damaged proteins. Inhibiting the proteasome can increase ROS levels
Lipid peroxidation: a process by which lipids are oxidized, leading to the production of ROS.
    -Increasing lipid peroxidation can increase ROS levels
• Ferroptosis: form of cell death that is regulated by iron and lipid peroxidation.
    -Increasing ferroptosis can increase ROS levels
• Mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP): regulates mitochondrial permeability.
    -Opening the mPTP can increase ROS levels
• BCL-2 family proteins: regulate apoptosis and can increase ROS levels when inhibited.
• Caspase-independent cell death: a form of cell death that is regulated by ROS.
    -Increasing caspase-independent cell death can increase ROS levels
• DNA damage response: regulates the repair of DNA damage. Increasing DNA damage can increase ROS
• Epigenetic regulation: process by which gene expression is regulated.
    -Increasing epigenetic regulation can increase ROS levels

-PKM2, but not PKM1, can be inhibited by direct oxidation of cysteine 358 as an adaptive response to increased intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS)

ProOxidant Strategy:(inhibit the Mevalonate Pathway (likely will also inhibit GPx)
-HydroxyCitrate (HCA) found as supplement online and typically used in a dose of about 1.5g/day or more
-Atorvastatin typically 40-80mg/day, -Dipyridamole typically 200mg 2x/day Combined effect research
-Lycopene typically 100mg/day range (note debatable as it mainly lowers NRF2)

Dual Role of Reactive Oxygen Species and their Application in Cancer Therapy
ROS-Inducing Interventions in Cancer — Canonical + Mechanistic Reference
-generated from AI and Cancer database
ROS rating:  +++ strong | ++ moderate | + weak | ± mixed | 0 none
NRF2:        ↓ suppressed | ↑ activated | ± mixed | 0 none
Conditions:  [D] dose  [Fe] metal  [M] metabolic  [O₂] oxygen
             [L] light [F] formulation [T] tumor-type [C] combination

Item ROS NRF2 Condition Mechanism Class Remarks
ROS">Piperlongumine +++ [D][T] ROS-dominant
ROS">Shikonin +++↓/±[D][T]ROS-dominant
ROS">Vitamin K3 (menadione) +++[D]ROS-dominant
ROS">Copper (ionic / nano) +++[Fe][F]ROS-dominant
ROS">Sodium Selenite +++[D]ROS-dominant
ROS">Juglone +++[D]ROS-dominant
ROS">Auranofin +++[D]ROS-dominant
ROS">Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) +++0[L][O₂]ROS-dominant
ROS">Radiotherapy / Radiation +++0[O₂]ROS-dominant
ROS">Doxorubicin +++[D]ROS-dominant
ROS">Cisplatin ++[D][T]ROS-dominant
ROS">Salinomycin ++[D][T]ROS-dominant
ROS">Artemisinin / DHA ++[Fe][T]ROS-dominant
ROS">Sulfasalazine ++[C][T]ROS-dominant
ROS">FMD / fasting ++[M][C][O₂]ROS-dominant
ROS">Vitamin C (pharmacologic) ++[Fe][D]ROS-dominant
ROS">Silver nanoparticles ++±[F][D]ROS-dominant
ROS">Gambogic acid ++[D][T]ROS-dominant
ROS">Parthenolide ++[D][T]ROS-dominant
ROS">Plumbagin ++[D]ROS-dominant
ROS">Allicin ++[D]ROS-dominant
ROS">Ashwagandha (Withaferin A) ++[D][T]ROS-dominant
ROS">Berberine ++[D][M]ROS-dominant
ROS">PEITC ++[D][C]ROS-dominant
ROS">Methionine restriction +[M][C][T]ROS-secondary
ROS">DCA +±[M][T]ROS-secondary
ROS">Capsaicin +±[D][T]ROS-secondary
ROS">Galloflavin +0[D]ROS-secondary
ROS">Piperine +±[D][F]ROS-secondary
ROS">Propyl gallate +[D]ROS-secondary
ROS">Scoulerine +?[D][T]ROS-secondary
ROS">Thymoquinone ±±[D][T]Dual redox
ROS">Emodin ±±[D][T]Dual redox
ROS">Alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) ±[D][M]NRF2-dominant
ROS">Curcumin ±↑/↓[D][F]NRF2-dominant
ROS">EGCG ±↑/↓[D][O₂]NRF2-dominant
ROS">Quercetin ±↑/↓[D][Fe]NRF2-dominant
ROS">Resveratrol ±[D][M]NRF2-dominant
ROS">Sulforaphane ±↑↑[D]NRF2-dominant
ROS">Lycopene 0Antioxidant
ROS">Rosmarinic acid 0Antioxidant
ROS">Citrate 00Neutral


Scientific Papers found: Click to Expand⟱
7310- Gos,    Gossypol, a BH3 mimetic, induces apoptosis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells
- in-vitro, AML, NA
TumCD↑, MOMP↑, ROS↑, ATP↓, BAX↑, Cyt‑c↑, AIF↑,
7311- Gos,    Systematic Review of Gossypol/AT-101 in Cancer Clinical Trials
- Review, CLL, NA
Dose↝, toxicity↓, PFS↓, OS↑, eff↑, BioAv↑, Bcl-2↓, ROS↑, MOMP↑, Dose↑, Casp3↑, Casp9↑, MMP↑, VEGF↓, APE1/APEX1↓, ChemoSen↑, RadioS↑, toxicity↑, AST↑, ALAT↑,
7314- Gos,    The BH3 mimetic (±) gossypol induces ROS-independent apoptosis and mitochondrial dysfunction in human A375 melanoma cells in vitro
- in-vitro, Melanoma, A375
Dose↝, ROS↑, selectivity↑, Half-Life↓, MMP↓, BioAv↑,
7315- Gos,    Gossypol reduction of tumor growth through ROS-dependent mitochondria pathway in human colorectal carcinoma cells
- vitro+vivo, CRC, HT29 - in-vitro, CRC, COLO205
TumCD↑, Casp3↑, Casp6↑, Casp8↑, Casp9↑, cl‑PARP↑, Bcl-xL↓, ROS↑, i-H2O2↑, eff↓, mtDam↑, MMP↓, Cyt‑c↑, AIF↑, TumCG↓,
7321- Gos,    The potential roles of gossypol as anticancer agent: advances and future directions
- Review, Var, NA
other↝, BioAv↑, Bcl-2↓, Casp3↑, Casp9↑, MOMP↑, ROS↑, ATP↓, mtDam↑, Apoptosis↑, hTERT/TERT↓, Akt↓, TumAuto↑, LC3‑Ⅱ/LC3‑Ⅰ↑, NRF2↓, ARE↓, ICAM-1↓, CX43/GJA1↓, NF-kB↓, TLR4↓, IL6↓, Inflam↓, CUL5↝, CUL1↝, NOXA↑, TumCI↓, TumCMig↓, TumCA↓, FAK↓, MDM2↓, VEGF↓, angioG↓, HLA-I/II↑, Imm↑, Dose↝, Glycolysis↓, OXPHOS↓,

Showing Research Papers: 1 to 5 of 5

* indicates research on normal cells as opposed to diseased cells
Total Research Paper Matches: 5

Pathway results for Effect on Cancer / Diseased Cells:


NA, unassigned(tgid=0)

APE1/APEX1↓, 1,   CUL1↝, 1,   CUL5↝, 1,   CX43/GJA1↓, 1,   HLA-I/II↑, 1,   PFS↓, 1,  

Redox & Oxidative Stress(tgid=1)

ARE↓, 1,   i-H2O2↑, 1,   NRF2↓, 1,   OXPHOS↓, 1,   ROS↑, 5,  

Mitochondria & Bioenergetics(tgid=3)

AIF↑, 2,   ATP↓, 2,   MMP↓, 2,   MMP↑, 1,   mtDam↑, 2,  

Core Metabolism/Glycolysis(tgid=4)

ALAT↑, 1,   Glycolysis↓, 1,  

Cell Death(tgid=5)

Akt↓, 1,   Apoptosis↑, 1,   BAX↑, 1,   Bcl-2↓, 2,   Bcl-xL↓, 1,   Casp3↑, 3,   Casp6↑, 1,   Casp8↑, 1,   Casp9↑, 3,   Cyt‑c↑, 2,   hTERT/TERT↓, 1,   MDM2↓, 1,   MOMP↑, 3,   NOXA↑, 1,   TumCD↑, 2,  

Transcription & Epigenetics(tgid=7)

other↝, 1,  

Autophagy & Lysosomes(tgid=9)

LC3‑Ⅱ/LC3‑Ⅰ↑, 1,   TumAuto↑, 1,  

DNA Damage & Repair(tgid=10)

cl‑PARP↑, 1,  

Proliferation, Differentiation & Cell State(tgid=12)

TumCG↓, 1,  

Migration(tgid=13)

FAK↓, 1,   TumCA↓, 1,   TumCI↓, 1,   TumCMig↓, 1,  

Angiogenesis & Vasculature(tgid=14)

angioG↓, 1,   VEGF↓, 2,  

Immune & Inflammatory Signaling(tgid=16)

ICAM-1↓, 1,   IL6↓, 1,   Imm↑, 1,   Inflam↓, 1,   NF-kB↓, 1,   TLR4↓, 1,  

Drug Metabolism & Resistance(tgid=21)

BioAv↑, 3,   ChemoSen↑, 1,   Dose↑, 1,   Dose↝, 3,   eff↓, 1,   eff↑, 1,   Half-Life↓, 1,   RadioS↑, 1,   selectivity↑, 1,  

Clinical Biomarkers(tgid=22)

ALAT↑, 1,   AST↑, 1,   hTERT/TERT↓, 1,   IL6↓, 1,  

Functional Outcomes(tgid=23)

OS↑, 1,   toxicity↓, 1,   toxicity↑, 1,  
Total Targets: 66

Pathway results for Effect on Normal Cells:


Total Targets: 0

Scientific Paper Hit Count for: ROS, Reactive Oxygen Species
5 Gossypol/AT-101
Query results interpretion may depend on "conditions" listed in the research papers.
Such Conditions may include : 
  -low or high Dose
  -format for product, such as nano of lipid formations
  -different cell line effects
  -synergies with other products 
  -if effect was for normal or cancerous cells
Filter Conditions: Pro/AntiFlg:%  IllCat:%  CanType:%  Cells:%  prod#:234  Target#:275  State#:%  Dir#:%
wNotes=0 sortOrder:rid,rpid

 

Home Page