| Features: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Auranofin — an orally administered gold(I) coordination complex (gold–phosphine–thiolate “thiosugar” drug) originally approved as a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) for rheumatoid arthritis and widely studied for repurposing as a redox-targeted anticancer and anti-infective agent. It is a small-molecule metallodrug whose pharmacology is typically tracked via blood/plasma gold concentrations because intact auranofin is rapidly transformed and not reliably detected in blood. Standard abbreviation(s): AF (auranofin); primary target shorthand: TrxR/TxNRD (thioredoxin reductase). Primary mechanisms (ranked):
Bioavailability / PK relevance: Oral absorption is incomplete; clinical PK is commonly described as ~25% of the gold content absorbed. Gold is highly protein-bound and exhibits prolonged retention/long terminal half-life, so effective exposure depends strongly on dose and dosing duration. Because “gold levels” are the main measurable surrogate, cross-study comparisons should specify matrix (whole blood vs plasma) and timing (steady-state vs short course). In-vitro vs systemic exposure relevance: Many oncology cell studies use ~0.5–5 µM AF. Human short-course data at 6 mg/day for 7 days report plasma gold on the order of ~0.1–0.3 µg/mL (roughly sub-µM to ~1–1.5 µM range when expressed as gold equivalents), meaning lower in-vitro ranges can overlap clinically observed exposure surrogates, while higher µM regimens may exceed typical oral exposures unless higher doses/longer courses or formulation changes are used. Clinical evidence status: Approved for rheumatoid arthritis (historical DMARD use) but oncology use remains investigational. Multiple early-phase repurposing trials exist across hematologic and solid tumors; several completed studies have limited publicly posted outcomes, and there is no established standard-of-care anticancer indication. Pathways: 1.Thioredoxin Reductase (TrxR) Inhibition. - Most widely recognized for potently inhibiting TrxR. 2.Induction of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) and Oxidative Stress. 3.MMP depolarization, release of cytochrome c 4.Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) Stress and Unfolded Protein Response (UPR) 5.Inhibition of Pro-survival Pathways (e.g., NF-κB Signaling) -ic50 for cancer typically 1-3uM, normal cell 5-10uM or higher. -Several studies animal testing antitumor efficacy have used doses in the region of 5–8 mg/kg via intraperitoneal injection or oral administration. -Auranofin’s anticancer activity is often linked to its inhibition of thioredoxin reductase, leading to increased oxidative stress. Mechanistic axes for Auranofin (Cancer vs Normal)
TSF legend: P: 0–30 min | R: 30 min–3 hr | G: >3 hr |
| Source: HalifaxProj (inhibit) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Type: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are highly reactive molecules that contain oxygen and can lead to oxidative stress in cells. They play a dual role in cancer biology, acting as both promoters and suppressors of cancer. ROS can cause oxidative damage to DNA, leading to mutations that may contribute to cancer initiation and progression. So normally you want to inhibit ROS to prevent cell mutations. However excessive ROS can induce apoptosis (programmed cell death) in cancer cells, potentially limiting tumor growth. Chemotherapy typically raises ROS. -mitochondria is the main source of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (and the ETC is heavily related) "Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are two electron reduction products of oxygen, including superoxide anion, hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl radical, lipid peroxides, protein peroxides and peroxides formed in nucleic acids 1. They are maintained in a dynamic balance by a series of reduction-oxidation (redox) reactions in biological systems and act as signaling molecules to drive cellular regulatory pathways." "During different stages of cancer formation, abnormal ROS levels play paradoxical roles in cell growth and death 8. A physiological concentration of ROS that maintained in equilibrium is necessary for normal cell survival. Ectopic ROS accumulation promotes cell proliferation and consequently induces malignant transformation of normal cells by initiating pathological conversion of physiological signaling networks. Excessive ROS levels lead to cell death by damaging cellular components, including proteins, lipid bilayers, and chromosomes. Therefore, both scavenging abnormally elevated ROS to prevent early neoplasia and facilitating ROS production to specifically kill cancer cells are promising anticancer therapeutic strategies, in spite of their contradictoriness and complexity." "ROS are the collection of derivatives of molecular oxygen that occur in biology, which can be categorized into two types, free radicals and non-radical species. The non-radical species are hydrogen peroxide (H 2O 2 ), organic hydroperoxides (ROOH), singlet molecular oxygen ( 1 O 2 ), electronically excited carbonyl, ozone (O3 ), hypochlorous acid (HOCl, and hypobromous acid HOBr). Free radical species are super-oxide anion radical (O 2•−), hydroxyl radical (•OH), peroxyl radical (ROO•) and alkoxyl radical (RO•) [130]. Any imbalance of ROS can lead to adverse effects. H2 O 2 and O 2 •− are the main redox signalling agents. The cellular concentration of H2 O 2 is about 10−8 M, which is almost a thousand times more than that of O2 •−". "Radicals are molecules with an odd number of electrons in the outer shell [393,394]. A pair of radicals can be formed by breaking a chemical bond or electron transfer between two molecules." Recent investigations have documented that polyphenols with good antioxidant activity may exhibit pro-oxidant activity in the presence of copper ions, which can induce apoptosis in various cancer cell lines but not in normal cells. "We have shown that such cell growth inhibition by polyphenols in cancer cells is reversed by copper-specific sequestering agent neocuproine to a significant extent whereas iron and zinc chelators are relatively ineffective, thus confirming the role of endogenous copper in the cytotoxic action of polyphenols against cancer cells. Therefore, this mechanism of mobilization of endogenous copper." > Ions could be one of the important mechanisms for the cytotoxic action of plant polyphenols against cancer cells and is possibly a common mechanism for all plant polyphenols. In fact, similar results obtained with four different polyphenolic compounds in this study, namely apigenin, luteolin, EGCG, and resveratrol, strengthen this idea. Interestingly, the normal breast epithelial MCF10A cells have earlier been shown to possess no detectable copper as opposed to breast cancer cells [24], which may explain their resistance to polyphenols apigenin- and luteolin-induced growth inhibition as observed here (Fig. 1). We have earlier proposed [25] that this preferential cytotoxicity of plant polyphenols toward cancer cells is explained by the observation made several years earlier, which showed that copper levels in cancer cells are significantly elevated in various malignancies. Thus, because of higher intracellular copper levels in cancer cells, it may be predicted that the cytotoxic concentrations of polyphenols required would be lower in these cells as compared to normal cells." Majority of ROS are produced as a by-product of oxidative phosphorylation, high levels of ROS are detected in almost all cancers. -It is well established that during ER stress, cytosolic calcium released from the ER is taken up by the mitochondrion to stimulate ROS overgeneration and the release of cytochrome c, both of which lead to apoptosis. Note: Products that may raise ROS can be found using this database, by: Filtering on the target of ROS, and selecting the Effect Direction of ↑ Targets to raise ROS (to kill cancer cells): • NADPH oxidases (NOX): NOX enzymes are involved in the production of ROS. -Targeting NOX enzymes can increase ROS levels and induce cancer cell death. -eNOX2 inhibition leads to a high NADH/NAD⁺ ratio which can lead to increased ROS • Mitochondrial complex I: Inhibiting can increase ROS production • P53: Activating p53 can increase ROS levels(by inducing the expression of pro-oxidant genes) • Nrf2 inhibition: regulates the expression of antioxidant genes. Inhibiting Nrf2 can increase ROS levels • Glutathione (GSH): an antioxidant. Depleting GSH can increase ROS levels • Catalase: Catalase converts H2O2 into H2O+O. Inhibiting catalase can increase ROS levels • SOD1: converts superoxide into hydrogen peroxide. Inhibiting SOD1 can increase ROS levels • PI3K/AKT pathway: regulates cell survival and metabolism. Inhibiting can increase ROS levels • HIF-1α inhibition: regulates genes involved in metabolism and angiogenesis. Inhibiting HIF-1α can increase ROS • Glycolysis: Inhibiting glycolysis can increase ROS levels • Fatty acid oxidation: Cancer cells often rely on fatty acid oxidation for energy production. -Inhibiting fatty acid oxidation can increase ROS levels • ER stress: Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress can increase ROS levels • Autophagy: process by which cells recycle damaged organelles and proteins. -Inhibiting autophagy can increase ROS levels and induce cancer cell death. • KEAP1/Nrf2 pathway: regulates the expression of antioxidant genes. -Inhibiting KEAP1 or activating Nrf2 can increase ROS levels and induce cancer cell death. • DJ-1: regulates the expression of antioxidant genes. Inhibiting DJ-1 can increase ROS levels • PARK2: regulates the expression of antioxidant genes. Inhibiting PARK2 can increase ROS levels • SIRT1 inhibition:regulates the expression of antioxidant genes. Inhibiting SIRT1 can increase ROS levels • AMPK activation: regulates energy metabolism and can increase ROS levels when activated. • mTOR inhibition: regulates cell growth and metabolism. Inhibiting mTOR can increase ROS levels • HSP90 inhibition: regulates protein folding and can increase ROS levels when inhibited. • Proteasome: degrades damaged proteins. Inhibiting the proteasome can increase ROS levels • Lipid peroxidation: a process by which lipids are oxidized, leading to the production of ROS. -Increasing lipid peroxidation can increase ROS levels • Ferroptosis: form of cell death that is regulated by iron and lipid peroxidation. -Increasing ferroptosis can increase ROS levels • Mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP): regulates mitochondrial permeability. -Opening the mPTP can increase ROS levels • BCL-2 family proteins: regulate apoptosis and can increase ROS levels when inhibited. • Caspase-independent cell death: a form of cell death that is regulated by ROS. -Increasing caspase-independent cell death can increase ROS levels • DNA damage response: regulates the repair of DNA damage. Increasing DNA damage can increase ROS • Epigenetic regulation: process by which gene expression is regulated. -Increasing epigenetic regulation can increase ROS levels -PKM2, but not PKM1, can be inhibited by direct oxidation of cysteine 358 as an adaptive response to increased intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) ProOxidant Strategy:(inhibit the Mevalonate Pathway (likely will also inhibit GPx) -HydroxyCitrate (HCA) found as supplement online and typically used in a dose of about 1.5g/day or more -Atorvastatin typically 40-80mg/day, -Dipyridamole typically 200mg 2x/day Combined effect research -Lycopene typically 100mg/day range (note debatable as it mainly lowers NRF2) Dual Role of Reactive Oxygen Species and their Application in Cancer Therapy ROS-Inducing Interventions in Cancer — Canonical + Mechanistic Reference -generated from AI and Cancer database ROS rating: +++ strong | ++ moderate | + weak | ± mixed | 0 none NRF2: ↓ suppressed | ↑ activated | ± mixed | 0 none Conditions: [D] dose [Fe] metal [M] metabolic [O₂] oxygen [L] light [F] formulation [T] tumor-type [C] combination
|
| 5462- | AF, | Repurposing Auranofin for Oncology and Beyond: A Brief Overview of Clinical Trials as Mono- and Combination Therapy |
| - | Review, | Var, | NA |
| 5472- | AF, | Auranofin induces apoptosis and necrosis in HeLa cells via oxidative stress and glutathione depletion |
| - | in-vitro, | Cerv, | HeLa |
| 5471- | AF, | Anti-Tumoral Treatment with Thioredoxin Reductase 1 Inhibitor Auranofin Fosters Regulatory T Cell and B16F10 Expansion in Mice |
| - | vitro+vivo, | Melanoma, | B16-F10 |
| 5470- | AF, | Exploring a Therapeutic Gold Mine: The Antifungal Potential of the Gold-Based Antirheumatic Drug Auranofin |
| - | Review, | Var, | NA |
| 5468- | AF, | The gold complex auranofin: new perspectives for cancer therapy |
| - | Review, | Var, | NA |
| 5466- | AF, | Auranofin Inhibition of Thioredoxin Reductase in a Preclinical Model of Small Cell Lung Cancer |
| - | in-vivo, | Lung, | NA |
| 5465- | AF, | The Thioredoxin Reductase Inhibitor Auranofin Suppresses Pulmonary Metastasis of Osteosarcoma, But Not Local Progression |
| - | in-vitro, | OS, | NA |
| 5464- | AF, | Inhibition of Thioredoxin-Reductase by Auranofin as a Pro-Oxidant Anticancer Strategy for Glioblastoma: In Vitro and In Vivo Studies |
| - | vitro+vivo, | GBM, | NA |
| 5463- | AF, | Will Auranofin Become a Golden New Treatment Against COVID-19? |
| - | Review, | Covid, | NA |
| 5461- | AF, | Dual inhibition of thioredoxin reductase and proteasome is required for auranofin-induced paraptosis in breast cancer cells |
| - | in-vitro, | BC, | MDA-MB-231 | - | in-vitro, | Nor, | MCF10 |
| 5460- | AF, | Auranofin radiosensitizes tumor cells through targeting thioredoxin reductase and resulting overproduction of reactive oxygen species |
| - | vitro+vivo, | Var, | 4T1 |
| 5459- | AF, | Auranofin Induces Lethality Driven by Reactive Oxygen Species in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Cells |
| - | in-vitro, | Ovarian, | NA |
| 1900- | AF, | Potential Anticancer Activity of Auranofin |
| - | Review, | Var, | NA |
| 1459- | SFN, | AF, | Auranofin Enhances Sulforaphane-Mediated Apoptosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Hep3B Cells through Inactivation of the PI3K/Akt Signaling Pathway |
| - | in-vitro, | Liver, | Hep3B | - | in-vitro, | Liver, | HepG2 |
Query results interpretion may depend on "conditions" listed in the research papers. Such Conditions may include : -low or high Dose -format for product, such as nano of lipid formations -different cell line effects -synergies with other products -if effect was for normal or cancerous cells
Filter Conditions: Pro/AntiFlg:% IllCat:% CanType:% Cells:% prod#:273 Target#:275 State#:% Dir#:%
wNotes=0 sortOrder:rid,rpid