Astragalus / ROS Cancer Research Results

AG, Astragalus: Click to Expand ⟱
Features:

Astragalus — Astragalus (AG; typically Astragalus membranaceus root, “Huangqi”) is a traditional botanical immunomodulator composed of multiple bioactive fractions, notably astragaloside IV (AS-IV; triterpenoid saponin), Astragalus polysaccharides (APS; high–molecular-weight glycans), and flavonoids. It is best classified as a multi-constituent herbal drug (botanical) whose dominant functional identity is immune regulation with secondary inflammation- and stress-response tuning. Common abbreviations include AG, AS-IV, and APS. In oncology contexts it is most often positioned as adjunct/supportive care rather than a validated standalone anticancer agent.

Primary mechanisms (ranked):

  1. Immune modulation with enhanced innate/adaptive effector function (macrophage, NK, T-cell activity; context-dependent antitumor immunity)
  2. Checkpoint and tumor–immune interface modulation (e.g., PD-L1 downregulation reported for APS in some models)
  3. Inflammation pathway tuning (NF-κB and cytokine networks; bidirectional depending on immune context)
  4. Growth/survival signaling modulation (PI3K/Akt/mTOR and MAPK; model- and constituent-dependent)
  5. EMT/migration programs (Wnt/β-catenin axis suppression reported in some tumor models)
  6. Redox/stress-response effects (ROS buffering and NRF2 activation are commonly reported; may be protective rather than directly cytotoxic)

Bioavailability / PK relevance: Constituent-dependent. AS-IV has low oral bioavailability and limited systemic exposure in typical oral-use scenarios; APS are poorly absorbed and are more plausibly active via gut–immune signaling and downstream immunomodulation rather than direct tumor exposure. Extract variability (species, processing, standardization) is a major translational confounder.

In-vitro vs systemic exposure relevance: Many mechanistic cancer studies use purified AS-IV or APS at concentrations unlikely to reflect achievable human plasma levels from typical oral extracts; immune-mediated and gut–immune mechanisms are often more plausible clinically than direct concentration-driven tumor cell cytotoxicity.

Clinical evidence status: Human evidence is strongest for adjunctive use alongside standard therapy (quality-of-life, fatigue, immune parameters, and some meta-analyses reporting improved response/toxicity profiles in specific settings). Robust evidence for standalone anticancer efficacy is not established.

Astragalus is an herb that has been used in traditional Chinese medicine for centuries.It has many purported health benefits, including immune-boosting, anti-aging and anti-inflammatory effects.
Astragalus (AG; commonly referring to Astragalus membranaceus root; major constituents: astragaloside IV [AS-IV], polysaccharides [APS], flavonoids) is a traditional botanical immunomodulator. Its dominant biology is immune modulation and stress-adaptive signaling, ranking conceptually as:
(1) immune activation/regulation (macrophage, NK, T-cell modulation),
(2) NF-κB and inflammatory pathway tuning,
(3) PI3K/Akt/mTOR and MAPK context-dependent signaling, and
(4) NRF2-mediated cytoprotection/antioxidant effects.
Bioavailability is variable and constituent-dependent; AS-IV has relatively low oral bioavailability, APS are high-molecular-weight and act largely via gut–immune interaction. Many in-vitro cancer studies use purified compounds at concentrations exceeding typical plasma levels. Clinical evidence exists primarily as adjunctive oncology support (quality-of-life, immune parameters); robust standalone anticancer efficacy is not established. Immune stimulation may enhance antitumor surveillance but effects are tumor- and context-dependent.

Astragalus (AG) — Cancer-Relevant Pathway Effects

Rank Pathway / Axis Cancer Cells Normal Cells TSF Primary Effect Notes / Interpretation
1 Immune Activation ↑ immune-mediated cytotoxicity (context-dependent) ↑ immune competence G Immunomodulation APS frequently show macrophage/NK/T-cell modulation in preclinical systems; clinical positioning is commonly adjunctive/supportive.
2 PD-1 / PD-L1 Axis ↓ PD-L1 (model-dependent); ↑ antitumor immunity ↔ R–G Immune checkpoint interface APS has been reported to reduce PD-L1–mediated immunosuppression in some tumor models; translation to clinical checkpoint therapy remains uncertain.
3 NF-κB Signaling ↓ NF-κB (tumor-promoting inflammation; context-dependent) ↔ / balanced activation R–G Inflammatory pathway tuning Commonly described as anti-inflammatory in many models, but immune-activation contexts can require transient inflammatory signaling.
4 PI3K/Akt/mTOR ↓ Akt/mTOR signaling (model-dependent) ↔ / survival support (context-dependent) R–G Anti-proliferative signaling Often demonstrated with purified constituents and/or higher in-vitro concentrations; may contribute to growth suppression in select models.
5 MAPK Axis ↓ ERK; ↑ JNK/p38 (stress/apoptosis; model-dependent) ↔ adaptive stress response R Stress-response reshaping Directionality varies by fraction (AS-IV vs APS vs flavonoids), tumor type, and dose.
6 Wnt / β-catenin and EMT ↓ Wnt/β-catenin; ↓ EMT; ↓ migration/invasion (model-dependent) ↔ G Anti-metastatic phenotype shift Reported in several preclinical models; relevance depends on whether adequate exposure and target engagement occur in vivo.
7 Glycolysis and HIF-1α ↓ glycolysis / ↓ lactate (model-dependent) ↔ R–G Metabolic downshift Metabolic effects are described in some models, but may be secondary to upstream signaling and inflammatory-state changes.
8 Angiogenesis ↓ pro-angiogenic signaling (model-dependent) ↔ G Anti-angiogenic tendency Evidence is preclinical and heterogeneous; may be indirect via NF-κB/cytokine modulation.
9 ROS Modulation ↓ ROS (dose-dependent) ↓ ROS (protective) P–R Redox buffering Can be supportive for normal-tissue protection; may be counterproductive if combined with therapies relying on oxidative cytotoxicity (context-dependent).
10 NRF2 Axis ↑ NRF2 (context-dependent) ↑ NRF2 (cytoprotection) R–G Antioxidant gene induction NRF2 activation can protect normal tissues but may also support tumor stress tolerance in some contexts; mechanistic centrality varies by fraction.
11 Chemosensitization ↑ chemo-sensitization reported (model-dependent) ↑ tolerance to toxicity (context-dependent) G Adjunct compatibility Clinical literature is mixed and highly formulation-specific; some meta-analyses suggest improved tolerance and response when combined with standard regimens in selected settings.
12 Clinical Translation Constraint Constituent variability; low AS-IV oral exposure; APS primarily gut–immune; in-vitro dosing often non-physiologic; interaction risk with immunosuppressants/anticoagulants — Heterogeneity / PK Most credible clinical role is adjunct/supportive care with careful attention to product standardization and drug–herb interaction risk.
TSF Legend: P: 0–30 min   R: 30 min–3 hr   G: >3 hr


Astragalus — In Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and broader neurodegeneration models, Astragalus fractions (notably AS-IV and flavonoids; sometimes APS indirectly) are most often described as cytoprotective via anti-inflammatory and antioxidant programs, with secondary support of pro-survival signaling and mitochondrial stability. Evidence is primarily preclinical; high-quality AD RCT efficacy remains unestablished.

Primary mechanisms (ranked):

  1. Oxidative stress reduction and cellular stress buffering (context-dependent)
  2. Neuroinflammation suppression (microglial and NF-κB-linked cytokine modulation)
  3. Pro-survival signaling support (e.g., PI3K/Akt in injury/neurodegeneration models; context-dependent)
  4. Mitochondrial stabilization and metabolic support (model-dependent)

Bioavailability / PK relevance: AS-IV systemic exposure is limited with typical oral dosing; CNS relevance depends on formulation and model. Many findings use purified compounds and dosing not directly comparable to common supplement use.

In-vitro vs systemic exposure relevance: Numerous neuronal studies employ concentrations/doses that may exceed achievable CNS exposure; interpretation should emphasize direction-of-effect rather than assuming clinical target engagement.

Clinical evidence status: Predominantly preclinical; insufficient robust AD-specific RCT evidence for disease-modifying benefit.

Astragalus (AG) — Alzheimer’s Disease (AD)-Relevant Effects

Rank Pathway / Axis AD Context TSF Primary Effect Notes
1 Oxidative Stress ↓ neuronal ROS (context-dependent) P–R Neuroprotection Often attributed to flavonoids/AS-IV in model systems; translation depends on exposure and disease stage.
2 Neuroinflammation ↓ microglial activation; ↓ inflammatory cytokines (model-dependent) R–G Anti-inflammatory Commonly framed through NF-κB-linked pathways in preclinical literature.
3 PI3K/Akt Survival Pathway ↑ neuronal survival signaling (context-dependent) G Pro-survival support Often studied in ischemia/toxicity paradigms rather than human AD pathology directly.
4 Mitochondrial Function ↑ mitochondrial stability (model-dependent) R–G Energy support Reported improvements in mitochondrial dynamics/oxidative injury markers in some models.
5 Clinical Translation Constraint No robust AD RCT efficacy data — Evidence gap Current evidence is insufficient to claim disease-modifying clinical benefit in AD.
TSF Legend: P: 0–30 min   R: 30 min–3 hr   G: >3 hr
ROS, Reactive Oxygen Species: Click to Expand ⟱
Source: HalifaxProj (inhibit)
Type:
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are highly reactive molecules that contain oxygen and can lead to oxidative stress in cells. They play a dual role in cancer biology, acting as both promoters and suppressors of cancer.
ROS can cause oxidative damage to DNA, leading to mutations that may contribute to cancer initiation and progression. So normally you want to inhibit ROS to prevent cell mutations.
However excessive ROS can induce apoptosis (programmed cell death) in cancer cells, potentially limiting tumor growth. Chemotherapy typically raises ROS.
-mitochondria is the main source of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (and the ETC is heavily related)

"Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are two electron reduction products of oxygen, including superoxide anion, hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl radical, lipid peroxides, protein peroxides and peroxides formed in nucleic acids 1. They are maintained in a dynamic balance by a series of reduction-oxidation (redox) reactions in biological systems and act as signaling molecules to drive cellular regulatory pathways."
"During different stages of cancer formation, abnormal ROS levels play paradoxical roles in cell growth and death 8. A physiological concentration of ROS that maintained in equilibrium is necessary for normal cell survival. Ectopic ROS accumulation promotes cell proliferation and consequently induces malignant transformation of normal cells by initiating pathological conversion of physiological signaling networks. Excessive ROS levels lead to cell death by damaging cellular components, including proteins, lipid bilayers, and chromosomes. Therefore, both scavenging abnormally elevated ROS to prevent early neoplasia and facilitating ROS production to specifically kill cancer cells are promising anticancer therapeutic strategies, in spite of their contradictoriness and complexity."
"ROS are the collection of derivatives of molecular oxygen that occur in biology, which can be categorized into two types, free radicals and non-radical species. The non-radical species are hydrogen peroxide (H 2O 2 ), organic hydroperoxides (ROOH), singlet molecular oxygen ( 1 O 2 ), electronically excited carbonyl, ozone (O3 ), hypochlorous acid (HOCl, and hypobromous acid HOBr). Free radical species are super-oxide anion radical (O 2•−), hydroxyl radical (•OH), peroxyl radical (ROO•) and alkoxyl radical (RO•) [130]. Any imbalance of ROS can lead to adverse effects. H2 O 2 and O 2 •− are the main redox signalling agents. The cellular concentration of H2 O 2 is about 10−8 M, which is almost a thousand times more than that of O2 •−".
"Radicals are molecules with an odd number of electrons in the outer shell [393,394]. A pair of radicals can be formed by breaking a chemical bond or electron transfer between two molecules."

Recent investigations have documented that polyphenols with good antioxidant activity may exhibit pro-oxidant activity in the presence of copper ions, which can induce apoptosis in various cancer cell lines but not in normal cells. "We have shown that such cell growth inhibition by polyphenols in cancer cells is reversed by copper-specific sequestering agent neocuproine to a significant extent whereas iron and zinc chelators are relatively ineffective, thus confirming the role of endogenous copper in the cytotoxic action of polyphenols against cancer cells. Therefore, this mechanism of mobilization of endogenous copper." > Ions could be one of the important mechanisms for the cytotoxic action of plant polyphenols against cancer cells and is possibly a common mechanism for all plant polyphenols. In fact, similar results obtained with four different polyphenolic compounds in this study, namely apigenin, luteolin, EGCG, and resveratrol, strengthen this idea.
Interestingly, the normal breast epithelial MCF10A cells have earlier been shown to possess no detectable copper as opposed to breast cancer cells [24], which may explain their resistance to polyphenols apigenin- and luteolin-induced growth inhibition as observed here (Fig. 1). We have earlier proposed [25] that this preferential cytotoxicity of plant polyphenols toward cancer cells is explained by the observation made several years earlier, which showed that copper levels in cancer cells are significantly elevated in various malignancies. Thus, because of higher intracellular copper levels in cancer cells, it may be predicted that the cytotoxic concentrations of polyphenols required would be lower in these cells as compared to normal cells."

Majority of ROS are produced as a by-product of oxidative phosphorylation, high levels of ROS are detected in almost all cancers.
-It is well established that during ER stress, cytosolic calcium released from the ER is taken up by the mitochondrion to stimulate ROS overgeneration and the release of cytochrome c, both of which lead to apoptosis.

Note: Products that may raise ROS can be found using this database, by:
Filtering on the target of ROS, and selecting the Effect Direction of ↑

Targets to raise ROS (to kill cancer cells):
• NADPH oxidases (NOX): NOX enzymes are involved in the production of ROS.
    -Targeting NOX enzymes can increase ROS levels and induce cancer cell death.
    -eNOX2 inhibition leads to a high NADH/NAD⁺ ratio which can lead to increased ROS
• Mitochondrial complex I: Inhibiting can increase ROS production
• P53: Activating p53 can increase ROS levels(by inducing the expression of pro-oxidant genes)
• Nrf2 inhibition: regulates the expression of antioxidant genes. Inhibiting Nrf2 can increase ROS levels
• Glutathione (GSH): an antioxidant. Depleting GSH can increase ROS levels
• Catalase: Catalase converts H2O2 into H2O+O. Inhibiting catalase can increase ROS levels
• SOD1: converts superoxide into hydrogen peroxide. Inhibiting SOD1 can increase ROS levels
• PI3K/AKT pathway: regulates cell survival and metabolism. Inhibiting can increase ROS levels
• HIF-1α inhibition: regulates genes involved in metabolism and angiogenesis. Inhibiting HIF-1α can increase ROS
• Glycolysis: Inhibiting glycolysis can increase ROS levels • Fatty acid oxidation: Cancer cells often rely on fatty acid oxidation for energy production.
-Inhibiting fatty acid oxidation can increase ROS levels
• ER stress: Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress can increase ROS levels
• Autophagy: process by which cells recycle damaged organelles and proteins.
-Inhibiting autophagy can increase ROS levels and induce cancer cell death.
• KEAP1/Nrf2 pathway: regulates the expression of antioxidant genes.
    -Inhibiting KEAP1 or activating Nrf2 can increase ROS levels and induce cancer cell death.
• DJ-1: regulates the expression of antioxidant genes. Inhibiting DJ-1 can increase ROS levels
• PARK2: regulates the expression of antioxidant genes. Inhibiting PARK2 can increase ROS levels
• SIRT1 inhibition:regulates the expression of antioxidant genes. Inhibiting SIRT1 can increase ROS levels
• AMPK activation: regulates energy metabolism and can increase ROS levels when activated.
• mTOR inhibition: regulates cell growth and metabolism. Inhibiting mTOR can increase ROS levels
• HSP90 inhibition: regulates protein folding and can increase ROS levels when inhibited.
• Proteasome: degrades damaged proteins. Inhibiting the proteasome can increase ROS levels
• Lipid peroxidation: a process by which lipids are oxidized, leading to the production of ROS.
    -Increasing lipid peroxidation can increase ROS levels
• Ferroptosis: form of cell death that is regulated by iron and lipid peroxidation.
    -Increasing ferroptosis can increase ROS levels
• Mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP): regulates mitochondrial permeability.
    -Opening the mPTP can increase ROS levels
• BCL-2 family proteins: regulate apoptosis and can increase ROS levels when inhibited.
• Caspase-independent cell death: a form of cell death that is regulated by ROS.
    -Increasing caspase-independent cell death can increase ROS levels
• DNA damage response: regulates the repair of DNA damage. Increasing DNA damage can increase ROS
• Epigenetic regulation: process by which gene expression is regulated.
    -Increasing epigenetic regulation can increase ROS levels

-PKM2, but not PKM1, can be inhibited by direct oxidation of cysteine 358 as an adaptive response to increased intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS)

ProOxidant Strategy:(inhibit the Mevalonate Pathway (likely will also inhibit GPx)
-HydroxyCitrate (HCA) found as supplement online and typically used in a dose of about 1.5g/day or more
-Atorvastatin typically 40-80mg/day, -Dipyridamole typically 200mg 2x/day Combined effect research
-Lycopene typically 100mg/day range (note debatable as it mainly lowers NRF2)

Dual Role of Reactive Oxygen Species and their Application in Cancer Therapy 
ROS-Inducing Interventions in Cancer — Canonical + Mechanistic Reference
-generated from AI and Cancer database
ROS rating:  +++ strong | ++ moderate | + weak | ± mixed | 0 none
NRF2:        ↓ suppressed | ↑ activated | ± mixed | 0 none
Conditions:  [D] dose  [Fe] metal  [M] metabolic  [O₂] oxygen
             [L] light [F] formulation [T] tumor-type [C] combination




Item ROS↑ NRF2 Condition Mechanism Class Remarks 



ROS">Piperlongumine
+++ ↓ [D][T] ROS-dominant






ROS">Shikonin
+++↓/±[D][T]ROS-dominant






ROS">Vitamin K3 (menadione)
+++↓[D]ROS-dominant






ROS">Copper (ionic / nano)
+++↓[Fe][F]ROS-dominant






ROS">Sodium Selenite
+++↓[D]ROS-dominant






ROS">Juglone
+++↓[D]ROS-dominant






ROS">Auranofin
+++↓[D]ROS-dominant






ROS">Photodynamic Therapy (PDT)
+++0[L][O₂]ROS-dominant






ROS">Radiotherapy / Radiation
+++0[O₂]ROS-dominant






ROS">Doxorubicin
+++↓[D]ROS-dominant






ROS">Cisplatin
++↓[D][T]ROS-dominant






ROS">Salinomycin
++↓[D][T]ROS-dominant






ROS">Artemisinin / DHA
++↓[Fe][T]ROS-dominant






ROS">Sulfasalazine
++↓[C][T]ROS-dominant






ROS">FMD / fasting
++↓[M][C][O₂]ROS-dominant






ROS">Vitamin C (pharmacologic)
++↓[Fe][D]ROS-dominant






ROS">Silver nanoparticles
++±[F][D]ROS-dominant






ROS">Gambogic acid
++↓[D][T]ROS-dominant






ROS">Parthenolide
++↓[D][T]ROS-dominant






ROS">Plumbagin
++↓[D]ROS-dominant






ROS">Allicin
++↓[D]ROS-dominant






ROS">Ashwagandha (Withaferin A)
++↓[D][T]ROS-dominant






ROS">Berberine
++↓[D][M]ROS-dominant






ROS">PEITC
++↓[D][C]ROS-dominant






ROS">Methionine restriction
+↓[M][C][T]ROS-secondary






ROS">DCA
+±[M][T]ROS-secondary






ROS">Capsaicin
+±[D][T]ROS-secondary






ROS">Galloflavin
+0[D]ROS-secondary






ROS">Piperine
+±[D][F]ROS-secondary






ROS">Propyl gallate
+↓[D]ROS-secondary






ROS">Scoulerine
+?[D][T]ROS-secondary






ROS">Thymoquinone
±±[D][T]Dual redox






ROS">Emodin
±±[D][T]Dual redox






ROS">Alpha-lipoic acid (ALA)
±↑[D][M]NRF2-dominant






ROS">Curcumin
±↑/↓[D][F]NRF2-dominant






ROS">EGCG
±↑/↓[D][O₂]NRF2-dominant






ROS">Quercetin
±↑/↓[D][Fe]NRF2-dominant






ROS">Resveratrol
±↑[D][M]NRF2-dominant






ROS">Sulforaphane
±↑↑[D]NRF2-dominant






ROS">Lycopene
0↑—Antioxidant






ROS">Rosmarinic acid
0↑—Antioxidant






ROS">Citrate
00—Neutral


Scientific Papers found: Click to Expand⟱
5434- AG,    Recent Advances in the Mechanisms and Applications of Astragalus Polysaccharides in Liver Cancer Treatment: An Overview
- Review, Liver, NA
AntiCan↑, Apoptosis↑, TumCP↓, EMT↓, Imm↑, ChemoSen↑, BioAv↓, TumCG↓, IL2↑, IL12↑, TNF-α↑, P-gp↓, MDR1↓, QoL↑, Casp↑, DNAdam↑, Bcl-2↓, BAX↑, MMP↓, Cyt‑c↑, NOTCH1↓, GSK‐3β↓, TumCCA↑, GSH↓, ROS↑, lipid-P↑, c-Iron↑, GPx4↓, ACSL4↑, Ferroptosis↑, Wnt↓, β-catenin/ZEB1↓, cycD1/CCND1↓, Akt↓, PI3K↓, mTOR↓, CXCR4↓, Vim↓, PD-L1↓, eff↑, eff↑, ChemoSen↑, ChemoSen↑, chemoP↑,
5430- AG,    Review of the pharmacological effects of astragaloside IV and its autophagic mechanism in association with inflammation
- Review, Stroke, NA
*cardioP↑, *MitoP↑, *ROS↓, *mtDam↓, *neuroP↓, TumAuto↓, *AntiDiabetic↑,

Showing Research Papers: 1 to 2 of 2

* indicates research on normal cells as opposed to diseased cells
Total Research Paper Matches: 2

Pathway results for Effect on Cancer / Diseased Cells:


Redox & Oxidative Stress ⓘ

Ferroptosis↑, 1,   GPx4↓, 1,   GSH↓, 1,   c-Iron↑, 1,   lipid-P↑, 1,   ROS↑, 1,  

Mitochondria & Bioenergetics ⓘ

MMP↓, 1,  

Core Metabolism/Glycolysis ⓘ

ACSL4↑, 1,  

Cell Death ⓘ

Akt↓, 1,   Apoptosis↑, 1,   BAX↑, 1,   Bcl-2↓, 1,   Casp↑, 1,   Cyt‑c↑, 1,   Ferroptosis↑, 1,  

Autophagy & Lysosomes ⓘ

TumAuto↓, 1,  

DNA Damage & Repair ⓘ

DNAdam↑, 1,  

Cell Cycle & Senescence ⓘ

cycD1/CCND1↓, 1,   TumCCA↑, 1,  

Proliferation, Differentiation & Cell State ⓘ

EMT↓, 1,   GSK‐3β↓, 1,   mTOR↓, 1,   NOTCH1↓, 1,   PI3K↓, 1,   TumCG↓, 1,   Wnt↓, 1,  

Migration ⓘ

TumCP↓, 1,   Vim↓, 1,   β-catenin/ZEB1↓, 1,  

Barriers & Transport ⓘ

P-gp↓, 1,  

Immune & Inflammatory Signaling ⓘ

CXCR4↓, 1,   IL12↑, 1,   IL2↑, 1,   Imm↑, 1,   PD-L1↓, 1,   TNF-α↑, 1,  

Drug Metabolism & Resistance ⓘ

BioAv↓, 1,   ChemoSen↑, 3,   eff↑, 2,   MDR1↓, 1,  

Clinical Biomarkers ⓘ

PD-L1↓, 1,  

Functional Outcomes ⓘ

AntiCan↑, 1,   chemoP↑, 1,   QoL↑, 1,  
Total Targets: 44

Pathway results for Effect on Normal Cells:


Redox & Oxidative Stress ⓘ

ROS↓, 1,  

Mitochondria & Bioenergetics ⓘ

mtDam↓, 1,  

Autophagy & Lysosomes ⓘ

MitoP↑, 1,  

Functional Outcomes ⓘ

AntiDiabetic↑, 1,   cardioP↑, 1,   neuroP↓, 1,  
Total Targets: 6

Scientific Paper Hit Count for: ROS, Reactive Oxygen Species
Query results interpretion may depend on "conditions" listed in the research papers.
Such Conditions may include : 
  -low or high Dose
  -format for product, such as nano of lipid formations
  -different cell line effects
  -synergies with other products 
  -if effect was for normal or cancerous cells

Filter Conditions: Pro/AntiFlg:%  IllCat:%  CanType:%  Cells:%  prod#:37  Target#:275  State#:%  Dir#:%
  wNotes=0  sortOrder:rid,rpid

 

Home Page