| Features: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selenium NanoParticles| Category | Role in cancer | | -------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | Sodium Selenium (selenite) | Direct cytotoxic redox poison | | Selenium (organic / nutritional) | **Redox buffer & immune modulator** (generally *anti-therapy* when oxidative stress is desired) | | SeNPs | Tunable redox-signaling anticancer platform |The introduction of borneol led to a significant reduction in the size of selenium nanoparticles (SeNPs), as documented in the study (Prabhakaret et al., 2013). In the chemical synthesis of selenium nanoparticles, a precursor such as sodium selenite (Na₂SeO₃) is dissolved in water to form a homogenous solution. A reducing agent, like ascorbic acid or sodium borohydride (NaBH₄), is then added to the solution. The reducing agent donates electrons to the selenium ions (SeO32−SeO32), reducing them to elemental selenium (Se0Se^0). This reduction process leads to the nucleation of selenium atoms, which subsequently grow into nanoparticles through controlled aggregation. Se NPs might be hepatoprotective. (chemoprotective) (radioprotective) (radiosensitizer)
Selenium nanoparticles (SeNPs) are a biocompatible, less-toxic,
and more controllable form of selenium compared to inorganic salts (like sodium selenite).
Major SeNPs hepatoprotective mechanisms
Mechanism Description Key markers affected
1. Antioxidant activity SeNPs boost antioxidant enzyme ↓ ROS, ↓ MDA, ↑ GSH, ↑ GPx
systems (GPx, SOD, CAT) and scavenge
ROS directly.
2. Anti-inflammatory effect Downregulate NF-κB, TNF-α, ↓ TNF-α, ↓ IL-1β, ↓ IL-6
IL-6, and COX-2 pathways.
3. Anti-apoptotic action Balance between Bcl-2/Bax and reduce ↑ Bcl-2, ↓ Bax, ↓ Caspase-3
caspase-3 activation in hepatocytes.
4. Metal/toxin chelation SeNPs can bind or transform toxic ↓ liver metal accumulation
metals (Cd²⁺, Hg²⁺, As³⁺)
into less harmful complexes.
5. Mitochondrial protection Maintain membrane potential, Preserved ΔΨm, ↑ ATP
prevent mitochondrial ROS burst,
and ATP loss.
6. Regeneration support Stimulate hepatocyte proliferation ↑ PCNA, improved histology
and repair via redox signaling
and selenoproteins.
Comparison: SeNPs vs. Sodium Selenite
Property SeNPs Sodium Selenite
Toxicity Low Moderate–high
Bioavailability Controlled, often slow- Rapid, less controllable
release
ROS balance Adaptive, mild antioxidant Can flip to pro-oxidant easily
Safety margin Wide Narrow
Hepatoprotection Strong, sustained Protective at low dose,
toxic at high dose
Form of SeNPs matter:1. Core composition / capping agent: SeNPs can be stabilized with polysaccharides, proteins, or small molecules. Some stabilizers may interact with cellular redox systems differently—e.g., a protein-capped SeNP may have slower release and less ROS generation, whereas a bare SeNP might induce stronger ROS in cancer cells. 2. Particle size: Smaller SeNPs (<50 nm) tend to generate more ROS and may enhance anticancer activity, but could theoretically interfere with ROS-dependent chemo if administered simultaneously. Larger SeNPs are slower-acting and may be safer alongside chemo. 3. Surface charge / coating: Positively charged or functionalized SeNPs can preferentially enter tumor cells, whereas neutral or negatively charged forms may distribute more evenly. This affects both selective cytotoxicity and interaction with normal cells. "30 mg of Na2SeO3.5H2O was added to 90 mL of Milli-Q water. Ascorbic acid (10 mL, 56.7 mM) was added dropwise to sodium selenite solution with vigorous stirring. 10 µL of polysorbate were added after each 2 ml of ascorbic acid. Selenium nanoparticles were formed after the addition of ascorbic acid. This can be visualized by a color change of the reactant solution from clear white to clear red. All solutions were made in a sterile environment by using a sterile cabinet and double distilled water." SeNPs Cancer relevant pathways
Selenium Nanoparticles (SeNPs) and Alzheimer’s Disease (AD)Overview: Selenium nanoparticles (SeNPs) are being investigated in Alzheimer’s disease primarily as a multifunctional neuroprotective nanoplatform rather than as a conventional nutrient supplement. In AD-oriented studies, SeNPs are used for one or more of the following: (1) direct inhibition of amyloid-β (Aβ) aggregation, (2) reduction of oxidative stress, (3) lowering of neuroinflammation, (4) improved blood-brain barrier (BBB) transport via targeting ligands, and/or (5) delivery or stabilization of partner compounds with poor brain availability. Current support is mainly from cell studies and rodent AD models, so the evidence is still experimental/preclinical, not established clinical therapy.
Mechanistic Summary
Overall Modulation Direction in AD
Evidence LevelPreclinical. The AD literature for SeNPs is mainly cell culture and rodent-model work. Formulation-specific effects are important; benefits shown for one coated or ligand-targeted SeNP system should not automatically be generalized to all selenium nanoparticles or to ordinary selenium supplementation. Notes / Interpretation
SeNP-Associated Products / Components Used in AD-Oriented Nanoformulations
Bottom LineFor AD, selenium nanoparticles appear most relevant as a multi-target anti-amyloid / antioxidant nanocarrier platform. Their strongest support is for reducing Aβ aggregation and oxidative-neuroinflammatory injury while improving delivery of partner neuroprotective compounds. At present, this is a research-stage strategy, not a validated clinical AD treatment. |
| Source: |
| Type: |
| In all eukaryotic cells, intracellular Ca2+ levels are maintained at low resting concentrations (approximately 100 nM) by the activity of the major Ca2+ extrusion system, the plasma membrane Ca2+-ATPase (PMCA), which exchanges extracellular protons (H+) for cytosolic Ca2+. Indeed, sustained elevation of [Ca2+]C in the form of overload, saturating all Ca2+-dependent effectors, prolonged decrease in [Ca2+]ER, causing ER stress response, and high [Ca2+]M, inducing mitochondrial permeability transition (MPT), are considered to be pro-death factors. In cancer the Ca2+-handling toolkit undergoes profound remodelling (figure 1) to favour activation of Ca2+-dependent transcription factors, such as the nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT), c-Myc, c-Jun, c-Fos that promote hypertrophic growth via induction of the expression of the G1 and G1/S phase transition cyclins (D and E) and associated cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK4 and CDK2). Thus, cancer cells may evade apoptosis through decreasing calcium influx into the cytoplasm. This can be achieved by either downregulation of the expression of plasma membrane Ca2+-permeable ion channels or by reducing the effectiveness of the signalling pathways that activate these channels. Such protective measures would largely diminish the possibility of Ca2+ overload in response to pro-apoptotic stimuli, thereby impairing the effectiveness of mitochondrial and cytoplasmic apoptotic pathways. Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels (VGCCs): Overexpression of VGCCs has been associated with increased tumor growth and metastasis in various cancers, including breast and prostate cancer. Store-Operated Calcium Entry (SOCE): SOCE mechanisms, such as STIM1 and ORAI1, are often upregulated in cancer cells, contributing to enhanced cell survival and proliferation. High intracellular calcium levels are associated with increased cell proliferation and migration, leading to a poorer prognosis. Calcium signaling can also influence hormone receptor status, affecting treatment responses. Increased Ca²⁺ signaling is associated with advanced disease and metastasis. Patients with higher CaSR expression may have a worse prognosis due to enhanced tumor growth and resistance to apoptosis. -Ca2+ is an important regulator of the electric charge distribution of bio-membranes. |
| 4501- | SeNPs, | Mechanisms of the Cytotoxic Effect of Selenium Nanoparticles in Different Human Cancer Cell Lines |
| - | in-vitro, | GBM, | A172 | - | in-vitro, | Colon, | Caco-2 | - | in-vitro, | Pca, | DU145 | - | in-vitro, | BC, | MCF-7 | - | in-vitro, | Nor, | L929 |
Query results interpretion may depend on "conditions" listed in the research papers. Such Conditions may include : -low or high Dose -format for product, such as nano of lipid formations -different cell line effects -synergies with other products -if effect was for normal or cancerous cells
Filter Conditions: Pro/AntiFlg:% IllCat:% CanType:% Cells:% prod#:391 Target#:38 State#:% Dir#:%
wNotes=0 sortOrder:rid,rpid