Hyperoside / LDH Cancer Research Results

HYP, Hyperoside: Click to Expand ⟱
Features:
Hyperoside is a chemical compound and a quercetin galactoside. It is found in various plants and has antibacterial, antifungal and UV blocking properties.
Hyperoside is an active ingredient in plants, such as Hypericum monogynum in Hypericaceae, Crataegus pinnatifida in Rosaceae and Polygonum aviculare in Polygonaceae.
Hyperoside is a natural flavonol glycoside in various plants, such as Crataegus pinnatifida Bge, Forsythia suspensa, and Cuscuta chinensis Lam.
**-Note NRF2 up in normal cells and down in cancer cells**
-not currently available as supplement, but it is in Hawthorn Extract. (Natural factors lists it as hyperoside equilvalents 6.6mg/300mg)

Hyperoside — also known as hyperin and quercetin-3-O-β-D-galactoside, is a naturally occurring flavonol glycoside consisting of quercetin conjugated at the 3-position to β-D-galactose. It is found in numerous medicinal and dietary plants including species of Hypericum, Crataegus, Polygonum, and Rhododendron. It is classified as a plant-derived flavonoid/polyphenolic small molecule. Hyperoside has antioxidant and cytoprotective activity in many normal-cell models but can produce cancer-selective stress responses, apoptosis, autophagy, and ferroptosis depending on tumor type and concentration. Its aglycone is quercetin.

Primary mechanisms (ranked):

  1. Apoptosis induction through mitochondrial dysfunction, Bax/Bcl-2 modulation, cytochrome-c release, and caspase-9/caspase-3 activation.
  2. PI3K/AKT/mTOR suppression with autophagy induction; ATG13-mediated autophagy has recently been identified as an important mechanism in NSCLC.
  3. NF-κB pathway inhibition, reducing prosurvival and inflammatory signaling and promoting apoptotic susceptibility.
  4. Redox modulation with strong context dependence: hyperoside can suppress excessive ROS in breast-cancer and normal-cell models, while in other tumor contexts oxidative stress contributes to cytotoxicity.
  5. NRF2/SLC7A11/GPX4 suppression and ferroptosis induction in chronic myeloid leukemia; this contrasts with NRF2 activation and antioxidant cytoprotection in many normal-cell models.
  6. MAPK modulation including p38/JNK-mediated mitochondrial apoptosis and context-dependent ERK regulation.
  7. Cell-cycle arrest through p53/p21 and related regulatory pathways.
  8. Suppression of tumor-cell migration, invasion, EMT, and inflammatory signaling.
  9. Radiosensitization through suppression of STAT3/AKT/ERK signaling demonstrated preclinically in esophageal carcinoma.

Bioavailability / PK relevance: Oral bioavailability of intact hyperoside appears poor. Rat studies found very low systemic exposure after intragastric administration, with substantially greater exposure after parenteral administration. Hyperoside is relatively resistant to gastrointestinal hydrolysis compared with isoquercitrin, which may limit absorption of its quercetin aglycone. Distribution studies indicate preferential accumulation in kidney relative to several other organs. Nanoparticle and liposomal formulations have therefore been investigated to improve delivery and tumor or mitochondrial accumulation. Long-term high-dose exposure warrants caution because renal toxicity has been reported preclinically.

In-vitro vs systemic exposure relevance: Many anticancer experiments use approximately 10–100 µM hyperoside, while some autophagy studies have used 0.5–2 mM. These concentrations, particularly the millimolar experiments, are unlikely to represent achievable concentrations of unchanged hyperoside following conventional oral administration. Consequently, direct translation of many in-vitro anticancer effects to oral supplementation is weak without an exposure-enhancing formulation.

Clinical evidence status: Preclinical. Anticancer activity has been demonstrated in multiple cancer-cell systems and several mouse xenograft or chemically induced tumor models, including lung, breast, pancreatic, skin, liver, colorectal, esophageal, and hematologic malignancy models. There is currently no established human anticancer efficacy, approved oncology indication, or convincing interventional clinical evidence for purified hyperoside. FDA substance registration identifies hyperoside chemically but does not constitute drug approval.

Hyperoside Cancer-Relevant Mechanisms

Rank Pathway / Axis Cancer Cells Normal Cells Primary Effect Notes / Interpretation
1 Mitochondrial apoptosis ↑ Bax/Bcl-2; ↑ cytochrome c; ↑ caspase-9; ↑ caspase-3; ↓ mitochondrial membrane potential Often ↔ or cytoprotective at lower concentrations Apoptotic cell death Observed across lung, pancreatic and colorectal models; one of the most reproducible anticancer effects.
2 PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling ↓ PI3K; ↓ AKT; ↓ mTOR; ↓ p70S6K; ↓ 4E-BP1 Context-dependent ↓ survival signaling; ↑ autophagy and apoptosis Strongly demonstrated in NSCLC and skin-cancer models.
3 Autophagy and ATG13 ↑ ATG13; ↑ LC3-II; ↑ autophagosomes ↔ in some comparative epithelial-cell experiments Autophagy-associated tumor suppression Recent NSCLC data support ATG13-mediated autophagy as an upstream contributor to apoptosis.
4 NF-κB inflammatory and survival signaling ↓ NF-κB activation; ↓ inflammatory cytokines; ↓ prosurvival signaling ↓ excessive inflammatory activation (context-dependent) ↑ apoptosis; ↓ inflammation and tumor progression Repeatedly reported in lung, pancreatic and breast models.
5 NRF2/SLC7A11/GPX4 ferroptosis axis ↓ NRF2; ↓ SLC7A11; ↓ GPX4; ↑ lipid oxidative stress ↑ NRF2/HO-1 in oxidative-stress models ↑ ferroptosis Important context-dependent differential effect. Direct NRF2 targeting has been reported in chronic myeloid leukemia, whereas normal cells commonly show NRF2 activation.
6 Redox regulation ↑ or ↓ ROS (context-dependent) ↓ excessive ROS; ↑ antioxidant defenses Context-dependent oxidative stress or antioxidant protection ROS direction is not uniform across cancer types. Breast-cancer studies report ↓ ROS, whereas some colorectal and ferroptotic models depend on increased oxidative stress.
7 p38/JNK mitochondrial stress signaling ↑ p38; ↑ JNK (model-dependent) Context-dependent ↑ mitochondrial apoptosis Particularly demonstrated in A549 NSCLC cells.
8 p53/p21 cell-cycle control ↑ p53; ↑ p21; ↑ G1 or G2/M arrest (model-dependent) Context-dependent ↓ proliferation Reported in colorectal and lung models; exact arrest point varies with model.
9 EGFR/ERK/FOXO1 signaling ↓ EGFR/ERK signaling; ↑ FOXO1 Unclear ↓ proliferation; ↑ apoptosis Recent NSCLC work identifies this axis as a potential therapeutic mechanism; T790M-positive NSCLC also shows FOXO1 upregulation.
10 Migration invasion and EMT ↓ migration; ↓ invasion; ↓ mesenchymal phenotype; ↑ E-cadherin Unclear ↓ metastatic phenotype Observed across several solid-tumor models including lung and esophageal carcinoma.
11 Radiosensitization ↑ radiation sensitivity; ↓ STAT3/AKT/ERK Insufficient evidence ↑ radiation-induced tumor control Demonstrated preclinically in esophageal carcinoma cells and mouse tumors; not clinically validated.
12 Clinical Translation Constraint Low oral exposure Potential renal accumulation with prolonged high-dose exposure Limits systemic translation Poor oral bioavailability and frequent use of high micromolar to millimolar experimental concentrations are major limitations. Targeted nanoparticles and liposomes may improve exposure.


Hyperoside and Alzheimer's disease: Hyperoside has significant preclinical neuroprotective evidence in Alzheimer's disease models. Long-term administration in APP/PS1 transgenic mice improved spatial learning and memory and reduced amyloid plaque deposition, tau phosphorylation, activated microglia and astrocytes, neuroinflammation, and oxidative stress. Mechanistic evidence implicates suppression of BACE1 and GSK-3β, protection of the blood-brain barrier, inhibition of mitochondrial and caspase-dependent apoptosis, and broader antioxidant/anti-inflammatory effects. Evidence remains preclinical; clinical efficacy in human Alzheimer's disease has not been established.

Hyperoside Alzheimer's-Relevant Mechanisms

Rank Pathway / Axis Modulation Primary Effect Notes / Interpretation
1 Amyloid and BACE1 ↓ BACE1; ↓ Aβ deposition ↓ amyloid pathology Demonstrated in APP/PS1 mice following chronic treatment.
2 GSK-3β and tau ↓ GSK-3β activity/signaling; ↓ tau phosphorylation ↓ tau pathology Provides a mechanistic connection between hyperoside treatment and reduced pathological tau phosphorylation.
3 Neuroinflammation ↓ activated microglia; ↓ activated astrocytes; ↓ inflammatory signaling ↓ neuroinflammation Observed in chronic APP/PS1 treatment studies.
4 Oxidative stress and NRF2 ↓ ROS; ↑ NRF2/HO-1 antioxidant defenses (context-dependent) Neuronal protection NRF2 activation is well established in non-cancer oxidative-stress models and is mechanistically consistent with hyperoside's neuroprotective phenotype.
5 Blood-brain barrier integrity ↑ ZO-1; ↑ claudin-5; ↑ occludin; ↓ MMP-2; ↓ MMP-9 ↓ Aβ-induced BBB disruption Demonstrated primarily in Aβ-exposed brain endothelial-cell models.
6 Mitochondrial apoptosis ↓ Bax/Bcl-2; ↓ cytochrome c release; ↓ caspase activation ↓ neuronal and endothelial apoptosis Opposite therapeutic direction to its pro-apoptotic action in cancer cells.
7 Clinical Translation Constraint Low oral bioavailability; uncertain human CNS exposure Limits clinical inference No established human AD efficacy; brain exposure and therapeutically relevant human dosing remain poorly defined.


LDH, Lactate Dehydrogenase: Click to Expand ⟱
Source:
Type:
LDH is a general term that refers to the enzyme that catalyzes the interconversion of lactate and pyruvate. LDH is a tetrameric enzyme, meaning it is composed of four subunits.
LDH refers to the enzyme as a whole, while LDHA specifically refers to the M subunit. Elevated LDHA levels are often associated with poor prognosis and aggressive tumor behavior, similar to elevated LDH levels.
leakage of LDH is a well-known indicator of cell membrane integrity and cell viability [35]. LDH leakage results from the breakdown of the plasma membrane and alterations in membrane permeability, and is widely used as a cytotoxicity endpoint.

However, it's worth noting that some studies have shown that LDHA is a more specific and sensitive biomarker for cancer than total LDH, as it is more closely associated with the Warburg effect and cancer metabolism.

Dysregulated LDH activity contributes significantly to cancer development, promoting the Warburg effect (Chen et al., 2007), which involves increased glucose uptake and lactate production, even in the presence of oxygen, to meet the energy demands of rapidly proliferating cancer cells (Warburg and Minami, 1923; Dai et al., 2016b). LDHA overexpression favors pyruvate to lactate conversion, leading to tumor microenvironment acidification and aiding cancer progression and metastasis.

Inhibitors:
Flavonoids, a group of polyphenols abundant in fruit, vegetables, and medicinal plants, function as LDH inhibitors.
LDH is used as a clinical biomarker for Synthetic liver function, nutrition

Tier A — Direct LDH Enzyme Inhibitors (Validated Catalytic Inhibition)

Rank Compound Type LDH Target Potency Level Primary Effect Notes
1 NCI-006 Research drug LDHA / LDHB High (in vivo active) Potent glycolysis suppression Modern benchmark LDH inhibitor used in metabolic oncology models.
2 (R)-GNE-140 Research drug LDHA (±LDHB) High (nM range reported) Lactate production ↓ Widely used experimental LDH inhibitor.
3 FX11 Research drug LDHA High (μM range) Metabolic crisis in LDHA-dependent tumors Classic LDHA inhibitor; often increases ROS secondary to metabolic stress.
4 Oxamate Tool compound LDH (pyruvate-competitive) Moderate (mM cellular use) Reduces lactate flux Classical LDH inhibitor; requires high concentrations in cells.
5 Gossypol Natural product derivative LDHA Moderate–High Glycolysis inhibition Also has other targets; safety considerations apply.
6 Galloflavin Natural compound LDH isoforms Moderate Lactate production ↓ One of the better-supported “natural-like” LDH inhibitors.

Tier B — Indirect LDH-Axis Modulators (Glycolysis / Lactate Reduction Without Confirmed Direct Catalytic Inhibition)

Rank Compound Mechanism Type LDH Claim Type Primary Axis Notes / Caution
1 Lonidamine MCT/MPC modulation Lactate axis inhibition Metabolic transport blockade Better classified as lactate/pyruvate transport modulator.
2 Stiripentol Repurposed drug LDH pathway modulation Metabolic axis modulation Emerging oncology interest; primarily neurological drug.
3 Quercetin Flavonoid Reported LDH inhibition (mixed evidence) NF-κB / PI3K modulation Often LDH-release confusion; direct enzymatic proof limited.
4 Ursolic acid Triterpenoid Reported LDH interaction Warburg modulation More credible as metabolic signaling modulator.
5 Fisetin Flavonoid Docking / indirect reports Apoptosis / survival signaling Enzyme inhibition not well validated.
6 Resveratrol Polyphenol Indirect glycolysis suppression AMPK / HIF-1α modulation Reduces lactate via upstream signaling.
7 Curcumin Polyphenol Indirect LDH expression modulation Inflammation + metabolic signaling Bioavailability limits translational strength.
8 Berberine Alkaloid Indirect metabolic modulation AMPK activation Closer to metformin-like metabolic pressure.
9 Honokiol Lignan Indirect glycolysis effects Survival pathway suppression Not validated as catalytic LDH inhibitor.
10 Silibinin Flavonolignan Mixed / indirect reports Inflammation + metabolic axis Often misclassified as LDH inhibitor.
11 Kaempferol Flavonoid Often LDH-release marker confusion Glucose transport / signaling Do not list as direct LDH inhibitor without enzyme data.
12 Oleanolic acid / Limonin / Allicin / Taurine Natural compounds Weak / indirect evidence General metabolic modulation Should not be categorized as true LDH inhibitors.

Tier A = Direct catalytic LDH inhibition (enzyme-level validation).
Tier B = Indirect lactate reduction or glycolytic modulation without strong catalytic inhibition evidence.
Important: LDH release assays (cell damage marker) are not proof of LDH enzymatic inhibition.



Scientific Papers found: Click to Expand⟱
7546- HYP,    Hyperoside attenuates hydrogen peroxide-induced L02 cell damage via MAPK-dependent Keap₁-Nrf₂-ARE signaling pathway
- in-vitro, Nor, L02
*TAC↑, *GPx↑, *Catalase↑, *ROS↓, *MMP↓, *LDH↑, *HO-1↑, *NRF2↑,

Showing Research Papers: 1 to 1 of 1

* indicates research on normal cells as opposed to diseased cells
Total Research Paper Matches: 1

Pathway results for Effect on Cancer / Diseased Cells:


Total Targets: 0

Pathway results for Effect on Normal Cells:


Redox & Oxidative Stress(tgid=1) ⓘ

Catalase↑, 1,   GPx↑, 1,   HO-1↑, 1,   NRF2↑, 1,   ROS↓, 1,   TAC↑, 1,  

Mitochondria & Bioenergetics(tgid=3) ⓘ

MMP↓, 1,  

Core Metabolism/Glycolysis(tgid=4) ⓘ

LDH↑, 1,  

Clinical Biomarkers(tgid=22) ⓘ

LDH↑, 1,  
Total Targets: 9

Scientific Paper Hit Count for: LDH, Lactate Dehydrogenase
Query results interpretion may depend on "conditions" listed in the research papers.
Such Conditions may include : 
  -low or high Dose
  -format for product, such as nano of lipid formations
  -different cell line effects
  -synergies with other products 
  -if effect was for normal or cancerous cells

Filter Conditions: Pro/AntiFlg:%  IllCat:%  CanType:%  Cells:%  prod#:97  Target#:906  State#:%  Dir#:%
  wNotes=0  sortOrder:rid,rpid

 

Home Page