Database Query Results : Magnetic Field Rotating, , selectivity

MFrot, Magnetic Field Rotating: Click to Expand ⟱

Features:

Rotary Magnetic field can be generated by a spinning magnet or magnets. Or it can be implemented with 2 or more coils, power with a phase shift between them (90 deg for 2 coil implementation) (60deg for 3 coil implementation)
Targets affected are mostly the same as for Magnet fields
Main differences
- may enhance the EPR effect allowing targeting of drugs to cancer cells
- acts as wireless stirrer, especially on magnetic particles(inducing eddy currents in water media)
- research for use in nano surgery, and mechanical destruction of cancer cells
- continue to highlight ability to raise ROS in cancer cell and lower ROS in normal cells
- RMF may be responsible for Ca2+ distribution to pass across the plasma membrane(differental affected for cancer and normal cells)

Pathways:
- induce ROS production in cancer cells, while decreasing ROS in normal cells. Ca2+ is critical and the Ca2+ balance is increased in cancer cells while decreased in normal cells (example for wound healing)
- ROS↑ related: MMP↓(ΔΨm), Ca+2↑, Cyt‑c↑, Caspases↑, DNA damage↑, cl-PARP↑, HSP↓, Prx,
- Raises AntiOxidant defense in Normal Cells: ROS↓, NRF2↑, SOD↑, GSH↑, Catalase↑,
- lowers Inflammation : NF-kB↓, COX2↓, p38↓, Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines : TNF-α↓, IL-6↓,
- inhibit Growth/Metastases : TumMeta↓, TumCG↓, MMPs↓, MMP2↓, MMP9↓, IGF-1↓, RhoA↓, NF-κB↓, TGF-β↓, ERK↓
- cause Cell cycle arrest : TumCCA↑,
- inhibits Migration/Invasion : TumCMig↓, TumCI↓, TNF-α↓, ERK↓,
- Others: PI3K↓, AKT↓, Wnt↓, AMPK, ERK↓, JNK,
- Synergies: < Others(review target notes), Neuroprotective, Cognitive,

- Selectivity: Cancer Cells vs Normal Cells

Rotating Magnetic Fields

Rank	Pathway / Axis	Cancer Cells	Normal Cells	TSF	Primary Effect	Notes / Interpretation
1	ROS (tumor-selective oxidative stress)	↑ ROS (P→R); sustained to cytotoxicity (G)	↔ minimal change or transient ↑ without injury (P→R)	P, R, G	Primary stress amplifier	Oncomagnetic reports emphasize selective tumor ROS increase with normal-cell sparing in comparable exposure conditions
2	Mitochondrial ETC inhibition (Complex I/NADH:ubiquinone)	↓ Complex I / respiration (P→R)	↔ limited effect (P→R)	P, R	Bioenergetic collapse trigger	Rotating/spinning fields are proposed to disrupt mitochondrial electron flow, driving ROS elevation upstream of ΔΨm loss
3	Ca²⁺ signaling (ER–mitochondria Ca²⁺ transfer / mitochondrial Ca²⁺ load)	↑ Ca²⁺ dysregulation (P→R) contributing to mitochondrial failure (G)	↔ buffered Ca²⁺ homeostasis (P→R)	P, R, G	Amplifies ETC/ROS-driven toxicity	RMF-driven mitochondrial stress can propagate via Ca²⁺ transfer to accelerate ΔΨm loss and pro-death ER stress in tumor cells while sparing normal cells
4	Mitochondrial permeability transition pore (MPTP)	↑ sustained MPTP opening (R→G)	↔ resistant to opening	P, R, G	Mitochondrial point-of-no-return	RMF-enhanced ROS and Ca²⁺ loading promote persistent MPTP opening in tumor mitochondria, driving energetic collapse and apoptosis while normal cells remain below the opening threshold
5	ΔΨm / mitochondrial membrane integrity	↓ ΔΨm (R); progresses (G)	↔ preserved	R, G	Mitochondrial failure threshold	Matches the “energy factory” targeting concept described in Oncomagnetic mechanism narratives
6	GSH depletion	↓ GSH (R→G)	↔ maintained	R, G	Loss of redox buffering	Cancer-selective inability to restore GSH is a key discriminator vs normal cells
7	NRF2 response (selectivity gate)	↔ delayed/insufficient NRF2 (R→G)	↑ NRF2 (R→G)	R, G	Adaptive protection	Normal-cell sparing is consistent with competent NRF2-driven antioxidant defense
8	ER stress / UPR (CHOP commitment)	↑ ER stress (R); CHOP/apoptotic UPR (G)	↑ adaptive UPR (R); resolves (G)	R, G	Proteostasis failure	ETC/ROS stress propagates to ER; commitment vs resolution diverges by cell robustness
9	DNA damage (oxidative; checkpoint markers)	↑ DNA damage (R→G)	↔ or repaired (G)	R, G	Checkpoint stress	Interpreted as ROS-mediated consequence; reported as increased damage markers in some translational datasets
10	LDH / glycolytic vulnerability	↓ LDH performance / ↓ glycolytic flux (R→G)	↔ metabolic flexibility	R, G	Metabolic choke	Cancer glycolysis becomes unstable when NADH/NAD+ and redox buffering are stressed
11	TrxR / thioredoxin system overload	↓ reserve (R→G)	↔ preserved	R, G	Parallel antioxidant collapse	Useful when GSH data are mixed; TrxR can be the limiting system under sustained ROS

Time-Scale Flag: TSF = P / R / G
  P: 0–30 min (physical / electron / radical effects)
  R: 30 min–3 hr (redox signaling & stress response)
  G: >3 hr (gene-regulatory adaptation)

MPTP: opening represents a mitochondrial commitment event integrating ROS and Ca²⁺ stress; sustained opening indicates irreversible bioenergetic failure.

selectivity, selectivity: Click to Expand ⟱

Source:

Type:

The selectivity of cancer products (such as chemotherapeutic agents, targeted therapies, immunotherapies, and novel cancer drugs) refers to their ability to affect cancer cells preferentially over normal, healthy cells. High selectivity is important because it can lead to better patient outcomes by reducing side effects and minimizing damage to normal tissues.

Achieving high selectivity in cancer treatment is crucial for improving patient outcomes. It relies on pinpointing molecular differences between cancerous and normal cells, designing drugs or delivery systems that exploit these differences, and overcoming intrinsic challenges like tumor heterogeneity and resistance

Factors that affect selectivity:
1. Ability of Cancer cells to preferentially absorb a product/drug
-EPR-enhanced permeability and retention of cancer cells
-nanoparticle formations/carriers may target cancer cells over normal cells
-Liposomal formations. Also negatively/positively charged affects absorbtion

2. Product/drug effect may be different for normal vs cancer cells
- hypoxia
- transition metal content levels (iron/copper) change probability of fenton reaction.
- pH levels
- antiOxidant levels and defense levels

3. Bio-availability

Scientific Papers found: Click to Expand⟱

2259-

MFrot,

MF,

Method and apparatus for oncomagnetic treatment

in-vitro,

GBM,

Oncomagnetic patent

MMP↓, Oncomagnetic patent Fig 2
Bcl-2↓,
BAX↑,
Bak↑,
Cyt‑c↑,
Casp3↑, caspase staining rises progressively until after 30 min most of the cells fluoresce positive for caspase, revealing activation of this enzyme
Casp9↑,
DNAdam↑,
ROS↑, applying the oscillating magnetic field to the tissue increases the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS )
lactateProd↑,
Apoptosis↑,
MPT↑, opening of the mitochondrial membrane permeability transition pore
*selectivity↑, repetitive magnetic stimulation has shown decreased apoptosis in non -cancerous cells .
eff↑, oncomagnetic therapy may be performed in conjunction with other forms of therapy such as with chemotherapy, other forms of radiative therapy, with drugs and prescriptions, etc
MMP↓, OMF which in turn produces rapidly fluctuating or sustained depolarizations of the mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) in the tissue .
selectivity↑, Because normal cells have a larger amount of mitochondria, have lower demand for ATP, and are not under stress, disruption of electron flow and small amount of ROS formation and MMP depolarization does not trigger apoptosis
TCA?, decrease in Krebs cycle metabolites
H2O2↑, increase in peroxide levels in GBM cells following stimulation by the system 100 using a rotating magnet
eff↑, combine the administration of BHB , or acetoacetate , or free fatty acid, or branched chain amino acid, or cryptochrome agonist , or MGMT inhibitor, or DNA alkylating agent, or DNA methylating agent, and OMF as a more effective treatment of cancer
*antiOx↑, upregulation of antioxidant mechanisms due to the application of OMFs further protects non -cancerous cells from any ROS -mediated apoptosis
H2O2↑, The experiments showed rapid increases in the levels of superoxide and H2O2 in GBM cells
eff↓, To test whether cell death is caused by the OMF - induced increase in ROS , a potent antioxidant Trolox was used to counteract it, while measuring the decrease in GBM cell count due to 4 h exposure to OMF.
GSH/GSSG↓, GSH/GSSG ratio almost exactly half that seen in control cells
*toxicity∅, No Cytotoxic Effect in Normal Cells
OS↑, OMF -Induced Prolongation of Survival in a Mouse Xenograft Model of GBM

2258-

MFrot,

MF,

EXTH-68. ONCOMAGNETIC TREATMENT SELECTIVELY KILLS GLIOMA CANCER CELLS BY INDUCING OXIDATIVE STRESS AND DNA DAMAGE

in-vitro,

GBM,

GBM

in-vitro,

Nor,

SVGp12

TumVol↓, GBM patient reversed the progression of his recurrent tumor causing >30% reduction in its contrast-enhanced volume within 4 weeks of treatment
OS↑, Mice with implanted mouse glioma cells in their brains also showed marked reduction in tumor size, increased survival (p< 0.05, n = 10)
γH2AX↑, higher DNA damage (g-H2AX foci) after sOMF treatment with a whole-body stimulation method developed by us
DNAdam↑,
selectivity↑, Normal mice exposed to sOMF for 4 months had no adverse effects on the brain and other organs
ROS↑, sOMF markedly increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels in cancer cells leading to the selective death of these cells, while sparing normal neurons and astrocytes
TumCD↑,
eff↑, sOMF exposure for just 2 h resulted in >40% loss of surviving GBM and DIPG cell colonies detected by clonogenic cell survival assay, similar to that produced by 2 Gy radiation dose.
eff↓, This loss was rescued by the antioxidant Trolox

4566-

MFrot,

On the mitochondrial aspect of reactive oxygen species action in external magnetic fields

Study,

Var,

ROS↑, formation of reactive oxygen species requires electron leakage from the normal route in the respiratory chain.
ETC↓, leakage
selectivity↑, For all those reasons, it can be expected that coapplication of a low external magnetic field and mitochondrial inducers of reactive oxygen species should damage cancer cells without any detriment to the normal cells.

186-

MFrot,

MF,

Selective induction of rapid cytotoxic effect in glioblastoma cells by oscillating magnetic fields

in-vitro,

GBM,

GBM

 new device that generates oscillating magnetic fields (OMF) by rapid rotation of strong permanent magnets in specially designed patterns of frequency and timing

in-vitro,

Lung,

mt-ROS↑, Cytotoxic effects of OMF may be caused by an increase in ROS
Casp3↑, Cell death is associated with activation of caspase 3
selectivity↑, OMF induces highly selective cell death of patient derived GBM cells associated with activation of caspase 3, while leaving normal tissue cells undamaged
TumCD↑, Exposure to OMF causes cancer cell death
ETC↓, The underlying mechanism is a marked increase in ROS in the mitochondria, possibly in part through perturbation of the electron flow in the respiratory chain.
H2O2↑, Figure 6A shows rapid increases in the levels of superoxide and H 2 O 2 in GBM cells,
eff↓, we used the potent antioxidant Trolox to counteract it,
GSH↑, We tested whether GSH synthesis was upregulated as a feedback protective effect in response to OMF-induced increase in ROS. An examination of GSH levels showed that there was a 20% elevation in treated cells
MMP↓, underlying mechanism involves a marked increase in ROS, mitochondrial membrane depolarization, fragmentation of mitochondrial network and activation of caspase 3.

187-

MFrot,

MF,

Method for noninvasive whole-body stimulation with spinning oscillating magnetic fields and its safety in mice

in-vivo,

GBM,

healthy mice

selectivity↑, Our in vitro experiments demonstrated selective cancer cell death while sparing normal cells by sOMF-induced increase in intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels due to magnetic perturbation of mitochondrial electron transport.
ROS↑,
*ROS∅,
*toxicity∅, no significant adverse effects of chronic or acute sOMF stimulation on the health, behavior, electrocardiographic and electroencephalographic activities, hematologic profile, and brain and other tissue and organ morphology of treated mice
ETC↓, We have evidence that its mechanism of action involves alteration of electron transport in the mitochondrial respiratory chain leading to the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS)(
TumVol↓, In a case report published recently we reported that 36-day treatment with this device caused a > 30% shrinkage of the contrast-enhanced tumor volume of a left frontal GBM in a 53-year-old male patient
Dose↝, rrangement of oncoscillators generates a magnetic field strength of >1 mT (range 1 – ~100 mT) in each cage

198-

MFrot,

MF,

Biological effects of rotating magnetic field: A review from 1969 to 2021

Review,

Var,

AntiCan↑, RMF can inhibit the growth of various types of cancer cells in vitro and in vivo and improve clinical symptoms of patients with advanced cancer.
breath↑, 0.4T, 7Hz RMF was applied to treat 13 advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients (2 h/day, 5 days per week, for 6–10 weeks)
Pain↓, Decreased pleural effusion (2 patients, 15.4%), remission of shortness of breath (5 patients, 38.5%), relief of cancer pain (5 patients, 38.5%), increased appetite (6 patients, 46.2%), improved physical strength (9 patients, 69.2%), regular bowel mov
Appetite↑,
Strength↑,
BowelM↑,
TumMeta↓, The same RMF (2 h/day, for 43 days) can also suppress the growth and metastasis of B16-F10 cells in vivo
TumCCA↑, The up-regulated transcription of miR-34a induced cell proliferation inhibition, cell cycle arrest, and cell senescence by targeting E2F1/E2F3, two members of E2F family which are major regulators of the cell cycle,
ETC↓, 2h exposure) effectively inhibited the growth of two types of cultured brain cancer cells, glioblastoma cells and diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma cells. They found that the mitochondrial electron transport chain was significantly disturbed by RMF,
MMP↓, which caused loss of mitochondrial integrity, decreased mitochondrial carbon flux in cancer cells, and eventual cancer cell death (Sharpe et al., 2021).
TumCD↑,
selectivity↑, same group further reported that the same RMF can also selectively kill cultured human glioblastoma and non-small cell lung cancer cells, and leave normal cells unharmed
ROS↑, Mechanistic studies revealed that RMF can increase the mitochondrial ROS level, which further activated the caspase-3 and disturbed the electron fflow in the respiratory chain pathway in cancer cells. (Helekar et al., 2021).
Casp3↑,
TumCG↓, 0.4T, 7.5Hz RMF (2 h/day, for 5 days) inhibited the growth of mouse melanoma cell line B16–F10 in vitro,
TumCCA↑, and its mechanism involved cell cycle arrest and decomposition of chromatins.
ChrMod↑,
TumMeta↓, (2 h/day, for 43 days) can also suppress the growth and metastasis of B16–F10 cells in vivo,
Imm↑, benefiting from improved immune function, including decreased regulatory T cells, increased T cells, and dendritic cells
DCells↑,
Akt↓, inhibiting the activation of the AKT pathway (Tang et al., 2016). T
OS⇅, 51 women with advanced breast cancer underwent RMF treatment. The results showed that 27 patients among them achieved signicant therapeutic effects, and there were no side-effects
toxicity↓,
QoL↑, 13 advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients the quality of life was improved in different degrees. Median survival and 1-year survival rate was 50% and 100% longer
hepatoP↑, In addition, it seems that the RMF can also attenuate liver damage in mice bearing MCF7 and GIST-T1 cells (Zha et al., 2018)
Pain↓, The results showed that the RMF treatment reduced abdominal pain by 42.9% (9/21), nausea/vomiting by 19.0% (4/21), weight loss by 52.4% (11/21), ongoing blood loss by 9.5% (2/21), improved physical strength by 23.8% (5/21) and sleep quality by 19.0%
Weight↑,
Strength↑,
Sleep↑,
IL6↓, Furthermore, decreased levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6), granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and keratinocyte-derived chemokine (KC) were observed
CD4+↑, it was discovered that macrophages and dendritic cells were activated, CD4+ T and CD8+ T lymphocytes increased, and the ratio of Th17/Treg was balanced.
CD8+↑,
Ca+2↑, effects of RMF were strongly associated with increased calcium tunnel activity and intracellular Ca2+ level in CNS
radioP↑, These results suggest that RMF may be helpful to alleviate the damage of hematopoietic function caused by radiotherapy and chemotherapy
chemoP↑,
*BMD↑, 0.4T, 8Hz RMF treatment (30min/day, for 30 days) along with calcium supplement, synergistically improved bone density
*AntiAge↑, In 2019, Xu et al. reported that a 4h exposure to a 0.2T, 4Hz RMF delayed the aging of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC)
*AMPK↑, Mechanistic research revealed that RMF treatment increased the expression of AMPK while reducing the expression of p21, p53 and mTOR.
*P21↓,
*P53↓,
*mTOR↓,
*OS↑, They also discovered that the RMF (2 h/day, for 6, 10 or 14days) can prolong the health status lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans.
*β-Endo↑, 0.1–0.8T, 0.33Hz RMF treatment signicantly increased the β-endorphin level in the blood of rabbits and humans (23 times higher than before). Moreover, it decreased serotonin (5-HT) in brains, small intestine tissue and serum of mice.
*5HT↓,

184-

MFrot,

MF,

Rotating Magnetic Fields Inhibit Mitochondrial Respiration, Promote Oxidative Stress and Produce Loss of Mitochondrial Integrity in Cancer Cells

in-vitro,

GBM,

GBM

 80mT pulsed

ROS↑, sOMF
mitResp↓, Inhibit Mitochondrial Respiration
mtDam↑, Produce Loss of Mitochondrial Integrity
Dose↝, Repeated intermittent sOMF was applied for 2 hours at a specific frequency, in the 200-300 Hz frequency range, with on-off epochs of 250 or 500 ms duration.
MMP?, ROS generation has been shown to be driven, in part, by elevated mitochondrial membrane chemiosmotic potential (ΔΨ) and ubiquinol (QH2)
OCR↓, Immediately after cessation of field rotation we observe a loss of mitochondrial integrity (labeled LMI), with a very rapid increase in O2 consumption
mt-H2O2↑, We have previously demonstrated that sOMF treatment of cells generates superoxide/hydrogen peroxide in the mitochondrial matrix
eff↓, we repeated the same experiment in the presence of Trolox, which protects thiols from ROS oxidation (47). sOMF treatment of RLM in State 3u pre-treated with Trolox (15 μM), show minimal inhibition,
SDH↓, SDH Inhibition by sOMF in State 3u RLM Is Caused by ROS Generation
Thiols↓, suggest that thiol oxidation in SDH may result from sOMF.
GSH↓, Glutathione in the mitochondrial matrix can provide some protection from ROS, but after solubilizing the mitochondria, this protection is lost and the SDH becomes more sensitive to sOMF.
TumCD↑, sOMF is highly effective at killing non-dividing GBM cell cultures,
Casp3↑, caspase-3 activation 1 h after sOMF
Casp7↑, rapid activation of caspase-3/7
MPT↑, OMF-treated cell that causes near simultaneous MPT, release of cytochrome c and other apoptosis-inducing factors, resulting in caspase-3/7 activation in these GBM cells.
Cyt‑c↑,
selectivity↑, differential sensitivity to sOMF of cancer cells over ‘normal’ cells becomes apparent. rapid increase in the reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the mitochondria to cytotoxic levels only in cancer cells, and not in normal human cortical neurons
GSH/GSSG↓, increasing GSSG/GSH ratio
ETC↓, completely arrest electron transport in isolated, respiring, rat liver mitochondria and patient derived glioblastoma (GBM)

205-

MFrot,

MF,

Intermittent F-actin Perturbations by Magnetic Fields Inhibit Breast Cancer Metastasis

vitro+vivo,

BC,

MDA-MB-231

 0.1-T and 0.4-T (~4.2 Hz)

 mouse

OS↑, 31-46% prolonged survival
F-actin↓, decrease F-actin formation in vitro and in vivo
TumCI↓,
TumCMig↓, >4.5hrs
Rho↓,
selectivity↑, F-actin in noncancerous breast cells is much less sensitive than that in breast cancer cells, which indicate that the normal cells in our human bodies are less likely to be agitated by these magnetic fields.
TumMeta↓, Using an intermittent treatment modality, low-frequency rotating magnetic fields could significantly reduce mouse breast cancer metastasis, prolong mouse survival by 31.5 to 46.0% (P < 0.0001), and improve their overall physical condition.

* indicates research on normal cells as opposed to diseased cells
Total Research Paper Matches: 8

Pathway results for Effect on Cancer / Diseased Cells:

Infection & Microbiome ⓘ

CD8+↑, 1,
Total Targets: 65

Pathway results for Effect on Normal Cells:

Redox & Oxidative Stress ⓘ

antiOx↑, 1, ROS∅, 1,

Core Metabolism/Glycolysis ⓘ

AMPK↑, 1,

DNA Damage & Repair ⓘ

P53↓, 1,

Cell Cycle & Senescence ⓘ

P21↓, 1,

Proliferation, Differentiation & Cell State ⓘ

mTOR↓, 1,

Migration ⓘ

β-Endo↑, 1,

Synaptic & Neurotransmission ⓘ

5HT↓, 1,

Drug Metabolism & Resistance ⓘ

selectivity↑, 1,

Clinical Biomarkers ⓘ

BMD↑, 1,

Functional Outcomes ⓘ

AntiAge↑, 1, OS↑, 1, toxicity∅, 2,
Total Targets: 13

Scientific Paper Hit Count for: selectivity, selectivity

8 Magnetic Field Rotating
7 Magnetic Fields

Query results interpretion may depend on "conditions" listed in the research papers.
Such Conditions may include : 
  -low or high Dose
  -format for product, such as nano of lipid formations
  -different cell line effects
  -synergies with other products 
  -if effect was for normal or cancerous cells

Filter Conditions: Pro/AntiFlg:%  IllCat:%  CanType:%  Cells:%  prod#:192  Target#:1110  State#:%  Dir#:%
  wNotes=on  sortOrder:rid,rpid

Database Query Results : Magnetic Field Rotating, , selectivity

Pathway results for Effect on Cancer / Diseased Cells:

Redox & Oxidative Stress ⓘ

Mitochondria & Bioenergetics ⓘ

Core Metabolism/Glycolysis ⓘ

Cell Death ⓘ

Transcription & Epigenetics ⓘ

DNA Damage & Repair ⓘ

Cell Cycle & Senescence ⓘ

Proliferation, Differentiation & Cell State ⓘ

Migration ⓘ

Immune & Inflammatory Signaling ⓘ

Drug Metabolism & Resistance ⓘ

Clinical Biomarkers ⓘ

Functional Outcomes ⓘ

Infection & Microbiome ⓘ

Pathway results for Effect on Normal Cells:

Redox & Oxidative Stress ⓘ

Core Metabolism/Glycolysis ⓘ

DNA Damage & Repair ⓘ

Cell Cycle & Senescence ⓘ

Proliferation, Differentiation & Cell State ⓘ

Migration ⓘ

Synaptic & Neurotransmission ⓘ

Drug Metabolism & Resistance ⓘ

Clinical Biomarkers ⓘ

Functional Outcomes ⓘ

Home Page