Database Query Results : Magnetic Field Rotating, , TGF-β

MFrot, Magnetic Field Rotating: Click to Expand ⟱
Features:
Rotary Magnetic field can be generated by a spinning magnet or magnets. Or it can be implemented with 2 or more coils, power with a phase shift between them (90 deg for 2 coil implementation) (60deg for 3 coil implementation)
Targets affected are mostly the same as for Magnet fields
Main differences
- may enhance the EPR effect allowing targeting of drugs to cancer cells
- acts as wireless stirrer, especially on magnetic particles(inducing eddy currents in water media)
- research for use in nano surgery, and mechanical destruction of cancer cells
- continue to highlight ability to raise ROS in cancer cell and lower ROS in normal cells
- RMF may be responsible for Ca2+ distribution to pass across the plasma membrane(differental affected for cancer and normal cells)

Pathways:
- induce ROS production in cancer cells, while decreasing ROS in normal cells. Ca2+ is critical and the Ca2+ balance is increased in cancer cells while decreased in normal cells (example for wound healing)
- ROS↑ related: MMP↓(ΔΨm), Ca+2↑, Cyt‑c↑, Caspases↑, DNA damage↑, cl-PARP↑, HSP↓, Prx,
- Raises AntiOxidant defense in Normal Cells: ROS↓, NRF2↑, SOD↑, GSH↑, Catalase↑,
- lowers Inflammation : NF-kB↓, COX2↓, p38↓, Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines : TNF-α↓, IL-6↓,
- inhibit Growth/Metastases : TumMeta↓, TumCG↓, MMPs↓, MMP2↓, MMP9↓, IGF-1↓, RhoA↓, NF-κB↓, TGF-β↓, ERK↓
- cause Cell cycle arrest : TumCCA↑,
- inhibits Migration/Invasion : TumCMig↓, TumCI↓, TNF-α↓, ERK↓,
- Others: PI3K↓, AKT↓, Wnt↓, AMPK, ERK↓, JNK,
- Synergies: < Others(review target notes), Neuroprotective, Cognitive,

- Selectivity: Cancer Cells vs Normal Cells

Rotating Magnetic Fields
Rank Pathway / Axis Cancer Cells Normal Cells TSF Primary Effect Notes / Interpretation
1 ROS (tumor-selective oxidative stress) ↑ ROS (P→R); sustained to cytotoxicity (G) ↔ minimal change or transient ↑ without injury (P→R) P, R, G Primary stress amplifier Oncomagnetic reports emphasize selective tumor ROS increase with normal-cell sparing in comparable exposure conditions
2 Mitochondrial ETC inhibition (Complex I/NADH:ubiquinone) ↓ Complex I / respiration (P→R) ↔ limited effect (P→R) P, R Bioenergetic collapse trigger Rotating/spinning fields are proposed to disrupt mitochondrial electron flow, driving ROS elevation upstream of ΔΨm loss
3 Ca²⁺ signaling (ER–mitochondria Ca²⁺ transfer / mitochondrial Ca²⁺ load) ↑ Ca²⁺ dysregulation (P→R) contributing to mitochondrial failure (G) ↔ buffered Ca²⁺ homeostasis (P→R) P, R, G Amplifies ETC/ROS-driven toxicity RMF-driven mitochondrial stress can propagate via Ca²⁺ transfer to accelerate ΔΨm loss and pro-death ER stress in tumor cells while sparing normal cells
4 Mitochondrial permeability transition pore (MPTP) ↑ sustained MPTP opening (R→G) ↔ resistant to opening P, R, G Mitochondrial point-of-no-return RMF-enhanced ROS and Ca²⁺ loading promote persistent MPTP opening in tumor mitochondria, driving energetic collapse and apoptosis while normal cells remain below the opening threshold
5 ΔΨm / mitochondrial membrane integrity ↓ ΔΨm (R); progresses (G) ↔ preserved R, G Mitochondrial failure threshold Matches the “energy factory” targeting concept described in Oncomagnetic mechanism narratives
6 GSH depletion ↓ GSH (R→G) ↔ maintained R, G Loss of redox buffering Cancer-selective inability to restore GSH is a key discriminator vs normal cells
7 NRF2 response (selectivity gate) ↔ delayed/insufficient NRF2 (R→G) ↑ NRF2 (R→G) R, G Adaptive protection Normal-cell sparing is consistent with competent NRF2-driven antioxidant defense
8 ER stress / UPR (CHOP commitment) ↑ ER stress (R); CHOP/apoptotic UPR (G) ↑ adaptive UPR (R); resolves (G) R, G Proteostasis failure ETC/ROS stress propagates to ER; commitment vs resolution diverges by cell robustness
9 DNA damage (oxidative; checkpoint markers) ↑ DNA damage (R→G) ↔ or repaired (G) R, G Checkpoint stress Interpreted as ROS-mediated consequence; reported as increased damage markers in some translational datasets
10 LDH / glycolytic vulnerability ↓ LDH performance / ↓ glycolytic flux (R→G) ↔ metabolic flexibility R, G Metabolic choke Cancer glycolysis becomes unstable when NADH/NAD+ and redox buffering are stressed
11 TrxR / thioredoxin system overload ↓ reserve (R→G) ↔ preserved R, G Parallel antioxidant collapse Useful when GSH data are mixed; TrxR can be the limiting system under sustained ROS 
Time-Scale Flag: TSF = P / R / G
  P: 0–30 min (physical / electron / radical effects)
  R: 30 min–3 hr (redox signaling & stress response)
  G: >3 hr (gene-regulatory adaptation)
MPTP: opening represents a mitochondrial commitment event integrating ROS and Ca²⁺ stress; sustained opening indicates irreversible bioenergetic failure.
TGF-β, transforming growth factor-beta: Click to Expand ⟱
Source: HalifaxProj(inhibit) CGL-CS TCGA
Type:
Human malignancies frequently exhibit mutations in the TGF-β pathway, and overactivation of this system is linked to tumor growth by promoting angiogenesis and inhibiting the innate and adaptive antitumor immune responses.
Anti-inflammatory cytokine.
In normal tissues, TGF-β plays an essential role in cell cycle regulation, immune function, and tissue remodeling.
- In early carcinogenesis, TGF-β typically acts as a tumor suppressor by inhibiting cell proliferation and inducing apoptosis.

In advanced cancers, cells frequently become resistant to the growth-inhibitory effects of TGF-β.
- TGF-β then switches roles and promotes tumor progression by stimulating epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), cell invasion, metastasis, and immune evasion.

Non-canonical (Smad-independent) pathways, such as MAPK, PI3K/Akt, and Rho signaling, also contribute to TGF-β-mediated responses.

Elevated levels of TGF-β have been detected in many advanced-stage cancers, including breast, lung, colorectal, pancreatic, and prostate cancers.
 - The switch from a tumor-suppressive to a tumor-promoting role is often associated with increased TGF-β production and activation in the tumor microenvironment.

High TGF-β expression or signaling activity is frequently correlated with aggressive disease features, resistance to therapy, increased metastasis, and poorer overall survival in many cancer types.
Scientific Papers found: Click to Expand⟱
3497- MFrot,  MF,    The Effect of a Rotating Magnetic Field on the Regenerative Potential of Platelets
- Human, Nor, NA
*PDGFR-BB↑, The highest concentration of PDGF-BB was observed in the samples placed in RMF for 1 h at 25 Hz
*TGF-β↑, For TGF-β1, the highest concentrations were obtained in the samples exposed to RMF for 3 h at 25 Hz and 1 h at 50 Hz.
*IGF-1↑, highest concentrations of IGF-1 and FGF-1 were shown in plasma placed in RMF for 3 h at 25 Hz.
*FGF↑,
*angioG↑, Magnetic fields have been shown to have a beneficial effect on vasodilation, angiogenesis, accelerating repair, regeneration, and healing of soft tissues, nervous tissues and bones, analgesic aspects, anti-swelling, reducing inflammation and pain, an
*Inflam↓,
*ROS↓, RMF exposure can increase resistance to heat stress, reduce levels of ROS, affect intracellular calcium ion concentrations, and contribute to cell aging deceleration

201- MFrot,  MF,    Gradient Rotating Magnetic Fields Impairing F-Actin-Related Gene CCDC150 to Inhibit Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Metastasis by Inactivating TGF-β1/SMAD3 Signaling Pathway
- in-vitro, BC, MDA-MB-231 - in-vitro, BC, BT549 - in-vitro, BC, MDA-MB-468
CCDC150↓, magnetic field response gene
TGF-β↓,
SMAD3↓,


* indicates research on normal cells as opposed to diseased cells
Total Research Paper Matches: 2

Pathway results for Effect on Cancer / Diseased Cells:


Migration ⓘ

CCDC150↓, 1,   SMAD3↓, 1,   TGF-β↓, 1,  
Total Targets: 3

Pathway results for Effect on Normal Cells:


Redox & Oxidative Stress ⓘ

ROS↓, 1,  

Proliferation, Differentiation & Cell State ⓘ

FGF↑, 1,   IGF-1↑, 1,  

Migration ⓘ

TGF-β↑, 1,  

Angiogenesis & Vasculature ⓘ

angioG↑, 1,   PDGFR-BB↑, 1,  

Immune & Inflammatory Signaling ⓘ

Inflam↓, 1,  
Total Targets: 7

Scientific Paper Hit Count for: TGF-β, transforming growth factor-beta
Query results interpretion may depend on "conditions" listed in the research papers.
Such Conditions may include : 
  -low or high Dose
  -format for product, such as nano of lipid formations
  -different cell line effects
  -synergies with other products 
  -if effect was for normal or cancerous cells

Filter Conditions: Pro/AntiFlg:%  IllCat:%  CanType:%  Cells:%  prod#:192  Target#:304  State#:%  Dir#:%
  wNotes=on  sortOrder:rid,rpid

 

Home Page