Database Query Results : Magnetic Field Rotating, , Cyt‑c

MFrot, Magnetic Field Rotating: Click to Expand ⟱
Features:
Rotary Magnetic field can be generated by a spinning magnet or magnets. Or it can be implemented with 2 or more coils, power with a phase shift between them (90 deg for 2 coil implementation) (60deg for 3 coil implementation)
Targets affected are mostly the same as for Magnet fields
Main differences
- may enhance the EPR effect allowing targeting of drugs to cancer cells
- acts as wireless stirrer, especially on magnetic particles(inducing eddy currents in water media)
- research for use in nano surgery, and mechanical destruction of cancer cells
- continue to highlight ability to raise ROS in cancer cell and lower ROS in normal cells
- RMF may be responsible for Ca2+ distribution to pass across the plasma membrane(differental affected for cancer and normal cells)

Pathways:
- induce ROS production in cancer cells, while decreasing ROS in normal cells. Ca2+ is critical and the Ca2+ balance is increased in cancer cells while decreased in normal cells (example for wound healing)
- ROS↑ related: MMP↓(ΔΨm), Ca+2↑, Cyt‑c, Caspases↑, DNA damage↑, cl-PARP↑, HSP↓, Prx,
- Raises AntiOxidant defense in Normal Cells: ROS↓, NRF2↑, SOD↑, GSH↑, Catalase↑,
- lowers Inflammation : NF-kB↓, COX2↓, p38↓, Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines : TNF-α↓, IL-6↓,
- inhibit Growth/Metastases : TumMeta↓, TumCG↓, MMPs↓, MMP2↓, MMP9↓, IGF-1↓, RhoA↓, NF-κB↓, TGF-β↓, ERK↓
- cause Cell cycle arrest : TumCCA↑,
- inhibits Migration/Invasion : TumCMig↓, TumCI↓, TNF-α↓, ERK↓,
- Others: PI3K↓, AKT↓, Wnt↓, AMPK, ERK↓, JNK,
- Synergies: < Others(review target notes), Neuroprotective, Cognitive,

- Selectivity: Cancer Cells vs Normal Cells

Rotating Magnetic Fields
Rank Pathway / Axis Cancer Cells Normal Cells TSF Primary Effect Notes / Interpretation
1 ROS (tumor-selective oxidative stress) ↑ ROS (P→R); sustained to cytotoxicity (G) ↔ minimal change or transient ↑ without injury (P→R) P, R, G Primary stress amplifier Oncomagnetic reports emphasize selective tumor ROS increase with normal-cell sparing in comparable exposure conditions
2 Mitochondrial ETC inhibition (Complex I/NADH:ubiquinone) ↓ Complex I / respiration (P→R) ↔ limited effect (P→R) P, R Bioenergetic collapse trigger Rotating/spinning fields are proposed to disrupt mitochondrial electron flow, driving ROS elevation upstream of ΔΨm loss
3 Ca²⁺ signaling (ER–mitochondria Ca²⁺ transfer / mitochondrial Ca²⁺ load) ↑ Ca²⁺ dysregulation (P→R) contributing to mitochondrial failure (G) ↔ buffered Ca²⁺ homeostasis (P→R) P, R, G Amplifies ETC/ROS-driven toxicity RMF-driven mitochondrial stress can propagate via Ca²⁺ transfer to accelerate ΔΨm loss and pro-death ER stress in tumor cells while sparing normal cells
4 Mitochondrial permeability transition pore (MPTP) ↑ sustained MPTP opening (R→G) ↔ resistant to opening P, R, G Mitochondrial point-of-no-return RMF-enhanced ROS and Ca²⁺ loading promote persistent MPTP opening in tumor mitochondria, driving energetic collapse and apoptosis while normal cells remain below the opening threshold
5 ΔΨm / mitochondrial membrane integrity ↓ ΔΨm (R); progresses (G) ↔ preserved R, G Mitochondrial failure threshold Matches the “energy factory” targeting concept described in Oncomagnetic mechanism narratives
6 GSH depletion ↓ GSH (R→G) ↔ maintained R, G Loss of redox buffering Cancer-selective inability to restore GSH is a key discriminator vs normal cells
7 NRF2 response (selectivity gate) ↔ delayed/insufficient NRF2 (R→G) ↑ NRF2 (R→G) R, G Adaptive protection Normal-cell sparing is consistent with competent NRF2-driven antioxidant defense
8 ER stress / UPR (CHOP commitment) ↑ ER stress (R); CHOP/apoptotic UPR (G) ↑ adaptive UPR (R); resolves (G) R, G Proteostasis failure ETC/ROS stress propagates to ER; commitment vs resolution diverges by cell robustness
9 DNA damage (oxidative; checkpoint markers) ↑ DNA damage (R→G) ↔ or repaired (G) R, G Checkpoint stress Interpreted as ROS-mediated consequence; reported as increased damage markers in some translational datasets
10 LDH / glycolytic vulnerability ↓ LDH performance / ↓ glycolytic flux (R→G) ↔ metabolic flexibility R, G Metabolic choke Cancer glycolysis becomes unstable when NADH/NAD+ and redox buffering are stressed
11 TrxR / thioredoxin system overload ↓ reserve (R→G) ↔ preserved R, G Parallel antioxidant collapse Useful when GSH data are mixed; TrxR can be the limiting system under sustained ROS
Time-Scale Flag: TSF = P / R / G
  P: 0–30 min (physical / electron / radical effects)
  R: 30 min–3 hr (redox signaling & stress response)
  G: >3 hr (gene-regulatory adaptation)
MPTP: opening represents a mitochondrial commitment event integrating ROS and Ca²⁺ stress; sustained opening indicates irreversible bioenergetic failure.


Cyt‑c, cyt-c Release into Cytosol: Click to Expand ⟱
Source:
Type:
Cytochrome c
** The term "release of cytochrome c" ** an increase in level for the cytosol.
Small hemeprotein found loosely associated with the inner membrane of the mitochondrion where it plays a critical role in cellular respiration. Cytochrome c is highly water-soluble, unlike other cytochromes. It is capable of undergoing oxidation and reduction as its iron atom converts between the ferrous and ferric forms, but does not bind oxygen. It also plays a major role in cell apoptosis.

The term "release of cytochrome c" refers to a critical step in the process of programmed cell death, also known as apoptosis.
In its new location—the cytosol—cytochrome c participates in the apoptotic signaling pathway by helping to form the apoptosome, which activates caspases that execute cell death.
Cytochrome c is a small protein normally located in the mitochondrial intermembrane space. Its primary role in healthy cells is to participate in the electron transport chain, a process that helps produce energy (ATP) through oxidative phosphorylation.
Mitochondrial outer membrane permeability leads to the release of cytochrome c from the mitochondria into the cytosol.
The release of cytochrome c is a pivotal event in apoptosis where cytochrome c moves from the mitochondria to the cytosol, initiating a chain reaction that leads to programmed cell death.

On the one hand, cytochrome c can promote cancer cell survival and proliferation by regulating the activity of various signaling pathways, such as the PI3K/AKT pathway. This can lead to increased cell growth and resistance to apoptosis, which are hallmarks of cancer.
On the other hand, cytochrome c can also induce apoptosis in cancer cells by interacting with other proteins, such as Apaf-1 and caspase-9. This can lead to the activation of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway, which can result in the death of cancer cells.
Overexpressed in Breast, Lung, Colon, and Prostrate.
Underexpressed in Ovarian, and Pancreatic.


Scientific Papers found: Click to Expand⟱
2259- MFrot,  MF,    Method and apparatus for oncomagnetic treatment
- in-vitro, GBM, NA
MMP↓, Oncomagnetic patent Fig 2
Bcl-2↓,
BAX↑,
Bak↑,
Cyt‑c↑,
Casp3↑, caspase staining rises progressively until after 30 min most of the cells fluoresce positive for caspase, revealing activation of this enzyme
Casp9↑,
DNAdam↑,
ROS↑, applying the oscillating magnetic field to the tissue increases the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS )
lactateProd↑,
Apoptosis↑,
MPT↑, opening of the mitochondrial membrane permeability transition pore
*selectivity↑, repetitive magnetic stimulation has shown decreased apoptosis in non -cancerous cells .
eff↑, oncomagnetic therapy may be performed in conjunction with other forms of therapy such as with chemotherapy, other forms of radiative therapy, with drugs and prescriptions, etc
MMP↓, OMF which in turn produces rapidly fluctuating or sustained depolarizations of the mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) in the tissue .
selectivity↑, Because normal cells have a larger amount of mitochondria, have lower demand for ATP, and are not under stress, disruption of electron flow and small amount of ROS formation and MMP depolarization does not trigger apoptosis
TCA?, decrease in Krebs cycle metabolites
H2O2↑, increase in peroxide levels in GBM cells following stimulation by the system 100 using a rotating magnet
eff↑, combine the administration of BHB , or acetoacetate , or free fatty acid, or branched chain amino acid, or cryptochrome agonist , or MGMT inhibitor, or DNA alkylating agent, or DNA methylating agent, and OMF as a more effective treatment of cancer
*antiOx↑, upregulation of antioxidant mechanisms due to the application of OMFs further protects non -cancerous cells from any ROS -mediated apoptosis
H2O2↑, The experiments showed rapid increases in the levels of superoxide and H2O2 in GBM cells
eff↓, To test whether cell death is caused by the OMF - induced increase in ROS , a potent antioxidant Trolox was used to counteract it, while measuring the decrease in GBM cell count due to 4 h exposure to OMF.
GSH/GSSG↓, GSH/GSSG ratio almost exactly half that seen in control cells
*toxicity∅, No Cytotoxic Effect in Normal Cells
OS↑, OMF -Induced Prolongation of Survival in a Mouse Xenograft Model of GBM

3493- MFrot,  MF,    Mechanical nanosurgery of chemoresistant glioblastoma using magnetically controlled carbon nanotubes
- in-vivo, GBM, NA
TumCD↑, We show that GBM cells internalize mCNTs, the mobilization of which by rotating magnetic field results in cell death.
MMP↓, We detected the dissipation of mitochondria membrane potential of GBM cells upon mCNT + magnetic treatment
Cyt‑c↑, When mitochondria integrity is compromised, mitochondrial cytochrome C is released into the cytosol to initiate caspases-dependent apoptosis
Apoptosis↑,
OS↑, Consistent with tumor burden reduction, mCNT + magnetic field treatment significantly extended the survival of GBM-bearing mice (median survival: 22.2 ± 4.0 versus 26.8 ± 6.0 days, P = 0.0072; Fig. 3F).
DNAdam↑, Tumor cells in the treatment group also exhibited increased DNA damage

184- MFrot,  MF,    Rotating Magnetic Fields Inhibit Mitochondrial Respiration, Promote Oxidative Stress and Produce Loss of Mitochondrial Integrity in Cancer Cells
- in-vitro, GBM, GBM
ROS↑, sOMF
mitResp↓, Inhibit Mitochondrial Respiration
mtDam↑, Produce Loss of Mitochondrial Integrity
Dose↝, Repeated intermittent sOMF was applied for 2 hours at a specific frequency, in the 200-300 Hz frequency range, with on-off epochs of 250 or 500 ms duration.
MMP?, ROS generation has been shown to be driven, in part, by elevated mitochondrial membrane chemiosmotic potential (ΔΨ) and ubiquinol (QH2)
OCR↓, Immediately after cessation of field rotation we observe a loss of mitochondrial integrity (labeled LMI), with a very rapid increase in O2 consumption
mt-H2O2↑, We have previously demonstrated that sOMF treatment of cells generates superoxide/hydrogen peroxide in the mitochondrial matrix
eff↓, we repeated the same experiment in the presence of Trolox, which protects thiols from ROS oxidation (47). sOMF treatment of RLM in State 3u pre-treated with Trolox (15 μM), show minimal inhibition,
SDH↓, SDH Inhibition by sOMF in State 3u RLM Is Caused by ROS Generation
Thiols↓, suggest that thiol oxidation in SDH may result from sOMF.
GSH↓, Glutathione in the mitochondrial matrix can provide some protection from ROS, but after solubilizing the mitochondria, this protection is lost and the SDH becomes more sensitive to sOMF.
TumCD↑, sOMF is highly effective at killing non-dividing GBM cell cultures,
Casp3↑, caspase-3 activation 1 h after sOMF
Casp7↑, rapid activation of caspase-3/7
MPT↑, OMF-treated cell that causes near simultaneous MPT, release of cytochrome c and other apoptosis-inducing factors, resulting in caspase-3/7 activation in these GBM cells.
Cyt‑c↑,
selectivity↑, differential sensitivity to sOMF of cancer cells over ‘normal’ cells becomes apparent. rapid increase in the reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the mitochondria to cytotoxic levels only in cancer cells, and not in normal human cortical neurons
GSH/GSSG↓, increasing GSSG/GSH ratio
ETC↓, completely arrest electron transport in isolated, respiring, rat liver mitochondria and patient derived glioblastoma (GBM)


* indicates research on normal cells as opposed to diseased cells
Total Research Paper Matches: 3

Pathway results for Effect on Cancer / Diseased Cells:


Redox & Oxidative Stress

GSH↓, 1,   GSH/GSSG↓, 2,   H2O2↑, 2,   mt-H2O2↑, 1,   ROS↑, 2,   Thiols↓, 1,  

Mitochondria & Bioenergetics

ETC↓, 1,   mitResp↓, 1,   MMP?, 1,   MMP↓, 3,   MPT↑, 2,   mtDam↑, 1,   OCR↓, 1,   SDH↓, 1,  

Core Metabolism/Glycolysis

lactateProd↑, 1,   TCA?, 1,  

Cell Death

Apoptosis↑, 2,   Bak↑, 1,   BAX↑, 1,   Bcl-2↓, 1,   Casp3↑, 2,   Casp7↑, 1,   Casp9↑, 1,   Cyt‑c↑, 3,   TumCD↑, 2,  

DNA Damage & Repair

DNAdam↑, 2,  

Drug Metabolism & Resistance

Dose↝, 1,   eff↓, 2,   eff↑, 2,   selectivity↑, 2,  

Functional Outcomes

OS↑, 2,  
Total Targets: 31

Pathway results for Effect on Normal Cells:


Redox & Oxidative Stress

antiOx↑, 1,  

Drug Metabolism & Resistance

selectivity↑, 1,  

Functional Outcomes

toxicity∅, 1,  
Total Targets: 3

Scientific Paper Hit Count for: Cyt‑c, cyt-c Release into Cytosol
3 Magnetic Field Rotating
3 Magnetic Fields
Query results interpretion may depend on "conditions" listed in the research papers.
Such Conditions may include : 
  -low or high Dose
  -format for product, such as nano of lipid formations
  -different cell line effects
  -synergies with other products 
  -if effect was for normal or cancerous cells
Filter Conditions: Pro/AntiFlg:%  IllCat:%  CanType:%  Cells:%  prod#:192  Target#:77  State#:%  Dir#:%
wNotes=on sortOrder:rid,rpid

 

Home Page