Database Query Results : Magnetic Field Rotating, , MMP9

MFrot, Magnetic Field Rotating: Click to Expand ⟱
Features:
Rotary Magnetic field can be generated by a spinning magnet or magnets. Or it can be implemented with 2 or more coils, power with a phase shift between them (90 deg for 2 coil implementation) (60deg for 3 coil implementation)
Targets affected are mostly the same as for Magnet fields
Main differences
- may enhance the EPR effect allowing targeting of drugs to cancer cells
- acts as wireless stirrer, especially on magnetic particles(inducing eddy currents in water media)
- research for use in nano surgery, and mechanical destruction of cancer cells
- continue to highlight ability to raise ROS in cancer cell and lower ROS in normal cells
- RMF may be responsible for Ca2+ distribution to pass across the plasma membrane(differental affected for cancer and normal cells)

Pathways:
- induce ROS production in cancer cells, while decreasing ROS in normal cells. Ca2+ is critical and the Ca2+ balance is increased in cancer cells while decreased in normal cells (example for wound healing)
- ROS↑ related: MMP↓(ΔΨm), Ca+2↑, Cyt‑c↑, Caspases↑, DNA damage↑, cl-PARP↑, HSP↓, Prx,
- Raises AntiOxidant defense in Normal Cells: ROS↓, NRF2↑, SOD↑, GSH↑, Catalase↑,
- lowers Inflammation : NF-kB↓, COX2↓, p38↓, Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines : TNF-α↓, IL-6↓,
- inhibit Growth/Metastases : TumMeta↓, TumCG↓, MMPs↓, MMP2↓, MMP9↓, IGF-1↓, RhoA↓, NF-κB↓, TGF-β↓, ERK↓
- cause Cell cycle arrest : TumCCA↑,
- inhibits Migration/Invasion : TumCMig↓, TumCI↓, TNF-α↓, ERK↓,
- Others: PI3K↓, AKT↓, Wnt↓, AMPK, ERK↓, JNK,
- Synergies: < Others(review target notes), Neuroprotective, Cognitive,

- Selectivity: Cancer Cells vs Normal Cells

Rotating Magnetic Fields
Rank Pathway / Axis Cancer Cells Normal Cells TSF Primary Effect Notes / Interpretation
1 ROS (tumor-selective oxidative stress) ↑ ROS (P→R); sustained to cytotoxicity (G) ↔ minimal change or transient ↑ without injury (P→R) P, R, G Primary stress amplifier Oncomagnetic reports emphasize selective tumor ROS increase with normal-cell sparing in comparable exposure conditions
2 Mitochondrial ETC inhibition (Complex I/NADH:ubiquinone) ↓ Complex I / respiration (P→R) ↔ limited effect (P→R) P, R Bioenergetic collapse trigger Rotating/spinning fields are proposed to disrupt mitochondrial electron flow, driving ROS elevation upstream of ΔΨm loss
3 Ca²⁺ signaling (ER–mitochondria Ca²⁺ transfer / mitochondrial Ca²⁺ load) ↑ Ca²⁺ dysregulation (P→R) contributing to mitochondrial failure (G) ↔ buffered Ca²⁺ homeostasis (P→R) P, R, G Amplifies ETC/ROS-driven toxicity RMF-driven mitochondrial stress can propagate via Ca²⁺ transfer to accelerate ΔΨm loss and pro-death ER stress in tumor cells while sparing normal cells
4 Mitochondrial permeability transition pore (MPTP) ↑ sustained MPTP opening (R→G) ↔ resistant to opening P, R, G Mitochondrial point-of-no-return RMF-enhanced ROS and Ca²⁺ loading promote persistent MPTP opening in tumor mitochondria, driving energetic collapse and apoptosis while normal cells remain below the opening threshold
5 ΔΨm / mitochondrial membrane integrity ↓ ΔΨm (R); progresses (G) ↔ preserved R, G Mitochondrial failure threshold Matches the “energy factory” targeting concept described in Oncomagnetic mechanism narratives
6 GSH depletion ↓ GSH (R→G) ↔ maintained R, G Loss of redox buffering Cancer-selective inability to restore GSH is a key discriminator vs normal cells
7 NRF2 response (selectivity gate) ↔ delayed/insufficient NRF2 (R→G) ↑ NRF2 (R→G) R, G Adaptive protection Normal-cell sparing is consistent with competent NRF2-driven antioxidant defense
8 ER stress / UPR (CHOP commitment) ↑ ER stress (R); CHOP/apoptotic UPR (G) ↑ adaptive UPR (R); resolves (G) R, G Proteostasis failure ETC/ROS stress propagates to ER; commitment vs resolution diverges by cell robustness
9 DNA damage (oxidative; checkpoint markers) ↑ DNA damage (R→G) ↔ or repaired (G) R, G Checkpoint stress Interpreted as ROS-mediated consequence; reported as increased damage markers in some translational datasets
10 LDH / glycolytic vulnerability ↓ LDH performance / ↓ glycolytic flux (R→G) ↔ metabolic flexibility R, G Metabolic choke Cancer glycolysis becomes unstable when NADH/NAD+ and redox buffering are stressed
11 TrxR / thioredoxin system overload ↓ reserve (R→G) ↔ preserved R, G Parallel antioxidant collapse Useful when GSH data are mixed; TrxR can be the limiting system under sustained ROS 
Time-Scale Flag: TSF = P / R / G
  P: 0–30 min (physical / electron / radical effects)
  R: 30 min–3 hr (redox signaling & stress response)
  G: >3 hr (gene-regulatory adaptation)
MPTP: opening represents a mitochondrial commitment event integrating ROS and Ca²⁺ stress; sustained opening indicates irreversible bioenergetic failure.
MMP9, MMP9: Click to Expand ⟱
Source: HalifaxProj(suppress)
Type:
Matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) is an enzyme that plays a significant role in the degradation of extracellular matrix components.
MMP-9 facilitates the breakdown of the extracellular matrix, which can enable cancer cells to invade surrounding tissues and spread to distant sites (metastasis).
Elevated levels of MMP-9 have been associated with poor prognosis in several cancers, including breast, lung, and colorectal cancers.
MMP2 and MMP9: two enzymes are critical to tumor invasion.
Scientific Papers found: Click to Expand⟱
2311- MFrot,  MF,    Magnetic fields as a potential therapy for diabetic wounds based on animal experiments and clinical trials
- in-vivo, Nor, HaCaT
*COX2↓, ELF‐EMF exposure enhances the proliferation of keratinocyte HaCaT cells and improves early NOS activity, while decreases cyclooxygenase 2 (COX‐2) which indicates its role in accelerating the transition from inflammation phase to remodelling phase.
*Inflam↓,
*MMP9↑, Exposure to ELF‐EMF with frequency of 50 Hz and intensity of 1 mT increases cytokine release and activates the expression of MMP‐9 in human immortalized keratinocytes
*GPx↑, On the contrary, ELF‐EMF activates glutathione peroxidase with decrease in malondialdehyde in the live tissue of rats during wound healing process
*Diff↑, ELF‐EMF promotes the proliferation and differentiation of transplanted epidermal stem cells in the full‐thickness defect nude mice

225- MFrot,  MF,    Extremely low frequency magnetic fields regulate differentiation of regulatory T cells: Potential role for ROS-mediated inhibition on AKT
- vitro+vivo, Lung, NA
MMP2↓,
MMP9↓,
FOXP3↓,
ROS↑,
p‑Akt↓,

3745- MFrot,  MF,    The neurobiological foundation of effective repetitive transcranial magnetic brain stimulation in Alzheimer's disease
- Review, AD, NA
*neuroP↑, neuroprotective actions aimed at mitigatingoxidative stress and inflammation, and intense stimulation of neu-rotrophic factors
*ROS↓,
*Inflam↓,
*5HT↑, increase in serotoninand its metabolites and a change in the properties of serotonergicreceptors.
*cFos↑, in rats, a single session of bothLF- (1 Hz) and HF-rTMS (10 Hz) enhanced c-Fos expression in all exam-ined cortical areas
*Aβ↓, rTMS enhances neuronal viability and counteracts oxidative stressors, such as Aβ and glutamate toxicity, in vitro
*memory↑, downregulation results in memory impairments
*BDNF↑, long-term change in synaptic proteinexpression due to BDNF-TrkB pathway activation following rTMSprotocols
*Ach↑, rTMSincreases ACh levels by modulating AChE activity.
*AChE↓,
*cognitive↑, HF-rTMS (20 Hz) and LF-rTMS (1 Hz)—in termsof neurotransmitter circuits and neurogenic signaling. 142 While bothprotocols improved cognition-related behaviors
*BDNF↑, Notably, rTMS could enhance BDNF and NGF expression irrespec-tive of frequency,
*NGF↑,
*β-catenin/ZEB1↑, both LF-rTMS (1 Hz) and HF-rTMS (10 Hz)protocols enhanced cognitive performance through the activation of β-catenin via the regulation of glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β) andTau
*p‑Akt↓, 3 weeks, iTBS reducedinflammation and increased anti-inflammatory molecules, specificallylinked to reversing the downregulation of phosphorylated forms ofAkt and the mammalian target of rapamycin.
*mTOR↓,
*MMP1↓, 6 months, patients showed significant reductions in plasma levels of MMP1, MMP9, and MMP10, along with increases in TIMP1 and TIMP2
*MMP9↓,
*MMP-10↓,
*TIMP1↑,
*TIMP2↑,


* indicates research on normal cells as opposed to diseased cells
Total Research Paper Matches: 3

Pathway results for Effect on Cancer / Diseased Cells:


Redox & Oxidative Stress ⓘ

ROS↑, 1,  

Cell Death ⓘ

p‑Akt↓, 1,  

Migration ⓘ

MMP2↓, 1,   MMP9↓, 1,  

Immune & Inflammatory Signaling ⓘ

FOXP3↓, 1,  
Total Targets: 5

Pathway results for Effect on Normal Cells:


Redox & Oxidative Stress ⓘ

GPx↑, 1,   ROS↓, 1,  

Cell Death ⓘ

p‑Akt↓, 1,  

Transcription & Epigenetics ⓘ

Ach↑, 1,  

Proliferation, Differentiation & Cell State ⓘ

cFos↑, 1,   Diff↑, 1,   mTOR↓, 1,  

Migration ⓘ

MMP-10↓, 1,   MMP1↓, 1,   MMP9↓, 1,   MMP9↑, 1,   TIMP1↑, 1,   TIMP2↑, 1,   β-catenin/ZEB1↑, 1,  

Immune & Inflammatory Signaling ⓘ

COX2↓, 1,   Inflam↓, 2,  

Synaptic & Neurotransmission ⓘ

5HT↑, 1,   AChE↓, 1,   BDNF↑, 2,   NGF↑, 1,  

Protein Aggregation ⓘ

Aβ↓, 1,  

Functional Outcomes ⓘ

cognitive↑, 1,   memory↑, 1,   neuroP↑, 1,  
Total Targets: 24

Scientific Paper Hit Count for: MMP9, MMP9
3 Magnetic Field Rotating
3 Magnetic Fields
Query results interpretion may depend on "conditions" listed in the research papers.
Such Conditions may include : 
  -low or high Dose
  -format for product, such as nano of lipid formations
  -different cell line effects
  -synergies with other products 
  -if effect was for normal or cancerous cells

Filter Conditions: Pro/AntiFlg:%  IllCat:%  CanType:%  Cells:%  prod#:192  Target#:203  State#:%  Dir#:%
  wNotes=on  sortOrder:rid,rpid

 

Home Page